Understanding hospital rehabilitation using electronic health records in patients with and without COVID-19.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11665-x
Konstantin Georgiev, Dimitrios Doudesis, Joanne McPeake, Nicholas L Mills, Jacques Fleuriot, Susan D Shenkin, Atul Anand
{"title":"Understanding hospital rehabilitation using electronic health records in patients with and without COVID-19.","authors":"Konstantin Georgiev, Dimitrios Doudesis, Joanne McPeake, Nicholas L Mills, Jacques Fleuriot, Susan D Shenkin, Atul Anand","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11665-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many hospitalised patients require rehabilitation during recovery from acute illness. We use routine data from Electronic Health Records (EHR) to report the quantity and intensity of rehabilitation required to achieve hospital discharge, comparing patients with and without COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults in whom COVID-19 testing was undertaken between March 2020 and August 2021 across three acute hospitals in Scotland. We defined rehabilitation contacts (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics and speech and language therapy) from timestamped EHR data and determined contact time from a linked workforce planning dataset. Our aim was to clarify rehabilitation required to achieve hospital discharge and so we excluded patients who died during their admission, and those who did not require rehabilitation (fewer than two specialist contacts). The primary outcome was total rehabilitation time. Secondary outcomes included the number of contacts, admission to first contact, and rehabilitation minutes per day. A multivariate regression analysis for identifying patient characteristics associated with rehabilitation time included age, sex, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 11,591 consecutive unique patient admissions (76 [63,85] years old, 56% female), of which 651 (6%) were with COVID-19, and 10,940 (94%) were admissions with negative testing. There were 128,646 rehabilitation contacts. Patients with COVID-19 received more than double the rehabilitation time compared to those without (365 [165, 772] vs 170 [95, 350] mins, p<0.001), and this was delivered over more specialist contacts (12 [6, 25] vs 6 [3, 11], p<0.001). Admission to first rehabilitation contact was later in patients with COVID-19 (3 [1, 5] vs 2 [1, 4] days from admission). Overall, patients with COVID-19 received fewer minutes of rehabilitation per day of admission (14.1 [9.8, 18.7] vs 15.6 [10.6, 21.3], p<0.001). In our regression analyses, older age and COVID-19 were associated with increased rehabilitation time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with COVID received more rehabilitation contact time than those without COVID, but this was delivered less intensively and was commenced later in an admission. Rehabilitation data derived from the EHR represents a novel measure of delivered hospital care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11665-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many hospitalised patients require rehabilitation during recovery from acute illness. We use routine data from Electronic Health Records (EHR) to report the quantity and intensity of rehabilitation required to achieve hospital discharge, comparing patients with and without COVID-19.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults in whom COVID-19 testing was undertaken between March 2020 and August 2021 across three acute hospitals in Scotland. We defined rehabilitation contacts (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics and speech and language therapy) from timestamped EHR data and determined contact time from a linked workforce planning dataset. Our aim was to clarify rehabilitation required to achieve hospital discharge and so we excluded patients who died during their admission, and those who did not require rehabilitation (fewer than two specialist contacts). The primary outcome was total rehabilitation time. Secondary outcomes included the number of contacts, admission to first contact, and rehabilitation minutes per day. A multivariate regression analysis for identifying patient characteristics associated with rehabilitation time included age, sex, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status.

Results: We included 11,591 consecutive unique patient admissions (76 [63,85] years old, 56% female), of which 651 (6%) were with COVID-19, and 10,940 (94%) were admissions with negative testing. There were 128,646 rehabilitation contacts. Patients with COVID-19 received more than double the rehabilitation time compared to those without (365 [165, 772] vs 170 [95, 350] mins, p<0.001), and this was delivered over more specialist contacts (12 [6, 25] vs 6 [3, 11], p<0.001). Admission to first rehabilitation contact was later in patients with COVID-19 (3 [1, 5] vs 2 [1, 4] days from admission). Overall, patients with COVID-19 received fewer minutes of rehabilitation per day of admission (14.1 [9.8, 18.7] vs 15.6 [10.6, 21.3], p<0.001). In our regression analyses, older age and COVID-19 were associated with increased rehabilitation time.

Conclusions: Patients with COVID received more rehabilitation contact time than those without COVID, but this was delivered less intensively and was commenced later in an admission. Rehabilitation data derived from the EHR represents a novel measure of delivered hospital care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子健康记录了解 COVID-19 患者和无 COVID-19 患者的医院康复情况。
背景:许多住院病人在急性病恢复期间需要康复治疗。我们利用电子健康记录(EHR)中的常规数据报告了出院所需的康复数量和强度,并对接受和未接受 COVID-19 检测的患者进行了比较:我们对苏格兰三家急症医院在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 8 月间进行 COVID-19 检测的连续成人进行了回顾性队列研究。我们根据有时间戳的电子病历数据定义了康复接触(物理治疗、职业治疗、营养学、言语和语言治疗),并根据关联的劳动力规划数据集确定了接触时间。我们的目的是明确出院所需的康复治疗,因此排除了入院期间死亡的患者和不需要康复治疗的患者(少于两次专家接触)。主要结果是总康复时间。次要结果包括接触次数、从入院到首次接触的时间以及每天的康复时间。通过多变量回归分析,确定了与康复时间相关的患者特征,包括年龄、性别、合并症和社会经济状况:我们共纳入了 11,591 名连续入院的唯一患者(76 [63,85] 岁,56% 为女性),其中 651 人(6%)患有 COVID-19,10,940 人(94%)检测结果为阴性。共有 128,646 次康复接触。COVID-19患者接受康复治疗的时间是未接受康复治疗患者的两倍多(365 [165, 772] vs 170 [95, 350] mins, p结论:与无 COVID 患者相比,有 COVID 的患者接受康复治疗的时间更长,但康复治疗的强度较低,而且入院时间较晚。从电子病历中提取的康复数据是衡量医院护理服务的一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Coadaptation and implementation of intrapartum clinical guidelines to save lives during childbirth: Protocol for an adapted PartoMa intervention in Eastern Ethiopia. Cervical cancer screen-and-treat services at HIV treatment sites in Nigeria: findings from the ICON-3 Practice Based Research Network. Service readiness of Public and private health facilities for roll-out of hepatitis C screening and management: a cross-sectional study. Missed nursing care from the perspectives of nurses and patients: a cross-sectional study. Navigating new pathways - healthcare personnel's experiences transitioning from traditional nursing homes to the dementia village care model in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1