Mothers' and caregivers' experiences of COVID-19 restrictions during postpartum hospitalisation: a cross-sectional survey in France.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06854-9
Sarah Louis, Anne Rousseau, Louise Mercier, Mireille Chamly, Laurent Gaucher
{"title":"Mothers' and caregivers' experiences of COVID-19 restrictions during postpartum hospitalisation: a cross-sectional survey in France.","authors":"Sarah Louis, Anne Rousseau, Louise Mercier, Mireille Chamly, Laurent Gaucher","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06854-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 highlighting the importance of social distancing guidelines. Following a series of lockdowns and the widespread vaccination of the European population, many countries began to lift these restrictions. During this period, while some parents yearned for emotional support and family presence, others found that the solitude facilitated by the restrictions was beneficial for bonding and breastfeeding. In France, postnatal stays are generally longer than in other countries, and the limited availability of home-based follow-up care, combined with pandemic isolation measures, further complicated perspectives on visitation restrictions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of mothers and caregivers regarding these visit restrictions in French maternity settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two multicentre descriptives surveys across five French maternity wards (three in Paris and two in Lyon) from June 1st to July 15th, 2021. Participants included mothers, selected based on criteria such as French-speaking, at-term birth (≥ 37 weeks), and hospitalisation with their newborn, as well as caregivers working in the postpartum units. Satisfaction with visitation restrictions was assessed using a four-point Likert scale, which was then dichotomised into \"mostly satisfied\" versus \"mostly dissatisfied\" for the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed complete responses from 430 of the 2,142 mothers (20.1%) and 221 of the 385 caregivers (57.4%) who participated during the study period. The majority of mothers (68.8%, n = 296/430) and caregivers (90.5%, n = 200/221) declare themselves satisfied with the policy of restricting visits to maternity wards. The main source of mother's satisfaction came from a quieter stay, but they regretted the absence of their other children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maternity visit restriction policies were largely supported by mothers and caregivers, especially when partners and siblings were allowed. Revisiting these policies, along with the postpartum stay length, may improve care, though further evaluation in non-pandemic settings is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06854-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 highlighting the importance of social distancing guidelines. Following a series of lockdowns and the widespread vaccination of the European population, many countries began to lift these restrictions. During this period, while some parents yearned for emotional support and family presence, others found that the solitude facilitated by the restrictions was beneficial for bonding and breastfeeding. In France, postnatal stays are generally longer than in other countries, and the limited availability of home-based follow-up care, combined with pandemic isolation measures, further complicated perspectives on visitation restrictions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of mothers and caregivers regarding these visit restrictions in French maternity settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We conducted two multicentre descriptives surveys across five French maternity wards (three in Paris and two in Lyon) from June 1st to July 15th, 2021. Participants included mothers, selected based on criteria such as French-speaking, at-term birth (≥ 37 weeks), and hospitalisation with their newborn, as well as caregivers working in the postpartum units. Satisfaction with visitation restrictions was assessed using a four-point Likert scale, which was then dichotomised into "mostly satisfied" versus "mostly dissatisfied" for the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with satisfaction.

Results: We analysed complete responses from 430 of the 2,142 mothers (20.1%) and 221 of the 385 caregivers (57.4%) who participated during the study period. The majority of mothers (68.8%, n = 296/430) and caregivers (90.5%, n = 200/221) declare themselves satisfied with the policy of restricting visits to maternity wards. The main source of mother's satisfaction came from a quieter stay, but they regretted the absence of their other children.

Conclusions: Maternity visit restriction policies were largely supported by mothers and caregivers, especially when partners and siblings were allowed. Revisiting these policies, along with the postpartum stay length, may improve care, though further evaluation in non-pandemic settings is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后住院期间母亲和护理人员对 COVID-19 限制的体验:法国横断面调查。
背景:SARS-CoV-2 的传播凸显了社会隔离准则的重要性。在一系列封锁和欧洲人口广泛接种疫苗之后,许多国家开始取消这些限制。在此期间,一些父母渴望得到情感支持和家人的陪伴,而另一些父母则发现,限制所带来的孤独感有利于亲子关系的建立和母乳喂养。在法国,产后住院时间通常比其他国家要长,而且家庭后续护理服务有限,再加上大流行病的隔离措施,使得人们对探视限制的看法更加复杂。因此,本研究的目的是评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间,母亲和护理人员对法国产科医院探视限制的满意度:我们于 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 7 月 15 日在法国的五个产科病房(三个在巴黎,两个在里昂)进行了两次多中心描述性调查。参与者包括根据讲法语、足月分娩(≥ 37 周)、新生儿住院等标准选出的母亲,以及在产后病房工作的护理人员。对探视限制的满意度采用李克特四点量表进行评估,然后将其分为 "基本满意 "和 "基本不满意 "进行分析。多变量逻辑回归模型用于确定与满意度相关的因素:我们分析了参与研究的 2,142 位母亲中的 430 位(20.1%)和 385 位照顾者中的 221 位(57.4%)的完整回答。大多数母亲(68.8%,n = 296/430)和护理人员(90.5%,n = 200/221)对限制探访产科病房的政策表示满意。母亲满意的主要原因是住得更安静了,但她们对其他孩子不在身边感到遗憾:产妇探视限制政策在很大程度上得到了母亲和护理人员的支持,尤其是在允许伴侣和兄弟姐妹探视的情况下。重新审视这些政策以及产后住院时间可能会改善护理工作,但还需要在非流行病环境中进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of retroplacental hematoma at the Maradi mother and child health center, Niger: a case‒control study. Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review. The impact of scaling and root planning combined with mouthwash during pregnancy on preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of peripartum cardiomyopathy in North Africa: insights from a single-center observational study in Tunisia. Perspectives of midwives on respectful maternity care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1