Supplementing provider counseling with an educational video prior to scheduled induction of labor.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06842-z
Kelsey J Pape, Sierra A Froehlich, David M Haas
{"title":"Supplementing provider counseling with an educational video prior to scheduled induction of labor.","authors":"Kelsey J Pape, Sierra A Froehlich, David M Haas","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06842-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Induction of labor (IOL) is common with one in four labors being induced in the United States (US). IOL has been associated with lower birth satisfaction. Video education can address gaps in education and promote anticipatory guidance. Prior studies in obstetrics have focused on randomized designs in English-speaking patients, leaving opportunities to explore how these tools perform in a pragmatic fashion with diverse patient populations. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a video education tool on patient satisfaction and knowledge of IOL experience in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled for IOL at a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single site pragmatic implementation of a quality improvement measure at an academic hospital. A bilingual survey was developed to evaluate the impact of an educational video on birth satisfaction and knowledge of IOL procedures. The video is freely available in English and Spanish. Baseline postpartum surveys were collected from June to July 2021. The video was subsequently recommended by providers when scheduling IOLs. Post-intervention surveys were collected from September to November 2021 after an implementation period. Groups were compared using t-tests for satisfaction scores and chi-square analyses for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two participants completed the baseline survey and 72 completed the post-implementation survey with response rates of 88.9% and 91.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes between mean total satisfaction scores (26.9 vs 28.0 out of 40.0, p = 0.290). 61 participants were English speaking (58%) and 43 Spanish (42%). Thirty (42%) patients reported watching the video. Correct identification of amniotomy use improved in the post-intervention group (p = 0.002). No changes were seen in anticipated duration of labor nor in whether patients would choose to be induced again.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendation of video education before scheduled IOL was associated with little improvement in knowledge about IOL, but no significant improvement in patient satisfaction. While video education has improved these measures in randomized trials, our study demonstrated that real-world implementation and patient uptake may be initially difficult. This study may help providers emphasize direct education and counseling and promote optimal implementation of innovative educational media.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06842-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Induction of labor (IOL) is common with one in four labors being induced in the United States (US). IOL has been associated with lower birth satisfaction. Video education can address gaps in education and promote anticipatory guidance. Prior studies in obstetrics have focused on randomized designs in English-speaking patients, leaving opportunities to explore how these tools perform in a pragmatic fashion with diverse patient populations. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a video education tool on patient satisfaction and knowledge of IOL experience in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled for IOL at a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: This was a single site pragmatic implementation of a quality improvement measure at an academic hospital. A bilingual survey was developed to evaluate the impact of an educational video on birth satisfaction and knowledge of IOL procedures. The video is freely available in English and Spanish. Baseline postpartum surveys were collected from June to July 2021. The video was subsequently recommended by providers when scheduling IOLs. Post-intervention surveys were collected from September to November 2021 after an implementation period. Groups were compared using t-tests for satisfaction scores and chi-square analyses for categorical variables.

Results: Thirty-two participants completed the baseline survey and 72 completed the post-implementation survey with response rates of 88.9% and 91.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes between mean total satisfaction scores (26.9 vs 28.0 out of 40.0, p = 0.290). 61 participants were English speaking (58%) and 43 Spanish (42%). Thirty (42%) patients reported watching the video. Correct identification of amniotomy use improved in the post-intervention group (p = 0.002). No changes were seen in anticipated duration of labor nor in whether patients would choose to be induced again.

Conclusions: Recommendation of video education before scheduled IOL was associated with little improvement in knowledge about IOL, but no significant improvement in patient satisfaction. While video education has improved these measures in randomized trials, our study demonstrated that real-world implementation and patient uptake may be initially difficult. This study may help providers emphasize direct education and counseling and promote optimal implementation of innovative educational media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在计划引产前,通过教育视频对提供者的咨询进行补充。
背景:引产(IOL)在美国很常见,每四次分娩中就有一次是引产。引产与分娩满意度较低有关。视频教育可以弥补教育方面的不足,促进预期指导。之前的产科研究主要针对讲英语的患者进行随机设计,因此没有机会探索这些工具在不同患者群体中的实用性。我们的目标是评估视频教育工具对英语和西班牙语患者的满意度和对在一家三级医院计划接受人工晶体植入术的知识的影响:这是在一家学术医院实施的一项质量改进措施。我们制定了一项双语调查,以评估教育视频对新生儿满意度和人工晶体植入术知识的影响。该视频有英语和西班牙语两种版本。产后基线调查于 2021 年 6 月至 7 月进行。随后,医疗机构在安排人工晶体植入手术时推荐使用该视频。干预后调查于实施期结束后的 2021 年 9 月至 11 月收集。采用 t 检验对满意度得分进行比较,采用卡方分析对分类变量进行比较:32 名参与者完成了基线调查,72 名参与者完成了实施后调查,回复率分别为 88.9% 和 91.1%。平均满意度总分(26.9 vs 28.0,满分 40.0,P = 0.290)之间没有明显的统计学变化。61 名参与者讲英语(58%),43 名讲西班牙语(42%)。30名(42%)患者表示观看了视频。干预后组对羊膜切开术的正确识别率有所提高(p = 0.002)。预期产程和患者是否选择再次引产的情况均无变化:结论:在安排人工晶体植入术前推荐视频教育与人工晶体植入术相关知识的改善不大,但患者满意度没有显著改善。虽然视频教育在随机试验中改善了这些指标,但我们的研究表明,在现实世界中实施视频教育和患者接受视频教育最初可能会很困难。这项研究可帮助医疗服务提供者重视直接教育和咨询,促进创新教育媒体的最佳实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Detecting sleep and physical activity changes across the perinatal period using wearable technology. Bladder involvement in placenta accreta spectrum disorders: 2D US combined with the 3D crystal Vue and MRI comparative analysis. Determinants of adequate antenatal care visits among pregnant women in low-resource setting: evidence from Tanzania national survey. Psychometric properties of the Maternal Postnatal Attachment Scale and the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire in three German samples. Clinical features and genetic analysis of 471 cases of fetal congenital heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1