Continuation of same programmed death-1 inhibitor regime beyond progression is a novel option for advanced gastric cancer.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13063-2
Jiasong Li, Fang Ding, Shasha Zhang, Yuanyuan Jia, Tianhang Zhang, Siqi Wang, Qingyi Liu, Zhanjun Guo
{"title":"Continuation of same programmed death-1 inhibitor regime beyond progression is a novel option for advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Jiasong Li, Fang Ding, Shasha Zhang, Yuanyuan Jia, Tianhang Zhang, Siqi Wang, Qingyi Liu, Zhanjun Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13063-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer is a significant global malignancy with poor prognosis. Although the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolonged the duration of survival, resistance and progression are inevitable. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We divided the advanced gastric cancer patients who received two lines immunotherapy into same regimen group (with same PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP) and different regimen group (with different PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP). Statistical analysis conducted to compare patient characteristics and evaluate survival differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The clinical outcome analysis showed that the same PD-1 inhibitor regime seemed to exhibit a higher disease control rate (DCR) (51.8% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.062), significantly prolonged progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) (162 vs. 75 days, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (312 vs. 166 days, P = 0.022) when compared with those of cross line. In the multivariate analysis, when using different regimen group as reference, the same regimen group was found to be independently associated with improved PFS2 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.267-0.816, P = 0.008] and OS (HR = 0.508, 95%CI: 0.278-0.927, P = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuation of the same type of PD-1 inhibitor regime in IBP shows clinical benefits and represents a promising therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13063-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is a significant global malignancy with poor prognosis. Although the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolonged the duration of survival, resistance and progression are inevitable. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP).

Method: We divided the advanced gastric cancer patients who received two lines immunotherapy into same regimen group (with same PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP) and different regimen group (with different PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP). Statistical analysis conducted to compare patient characteristics and evaluate survival differences between groups.

Result: The clinical outcome analysis showed that the same PD-1 inhibitor regime seemed to exhibit a higher disease control rate (DCR) (51.8% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.062), significantly prolonged progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) (162 vs. 75 days, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (312 vs. 166 days, P = 0.022) when compared with those of cross line. In the multivariate analysis, when using different regimen group as reference, the same regimen group was found to be independently associated with improved PFS2 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.267-0.816, P = 0.008] and OS (HR = 0.508, 95%CI: 0.278-0.927, P = 0.027).

Conclusion: Continuation of the same type of PD-1 inhibitor regime in IBP shows clinical benefits and represents a promising therapeutic approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在进展期后继续使用相同的程序性死亡-1抑制剂是治疗晚期胃癌的一种新选择。
背景:胃癌是一种严重的全球性恶性肿瘤,预后较差。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现延长了患者的生存期,但耐药和进展是不可避免的。我们旨在评估程序性死亡-1(PD-1)抑制剂在进展期后免疫治疗(IBP)中的有效性:方法:我们将接受两线免疫治疗的晚期胃癌患者分为相同方案组(IBP后使用相同的PD-1抑制剂方案)和不同方案组(IBP后使用不同的PD-1抑制剂方案)。统计分析比较了患者特征,并评估了组间生存率差异:临床结果分析表明,与交叉方案相比,相同的PD-1抑制剂方案似乎表现出更高的疾病控制率(DCR)(51.8% vs. 29.2%,P = 0.062),显著延长无进展生存期2(PFS2)(162天 vs. 75天,P = 0.001)和总生存期(OS)(312天 vs. 166天,P = 0.022)。在多变量分析中,以不同方案组为参照,发现相同方案组与PFS2[危险比(HR)=0.467,95%置信区间(CI):0.267-0.816,P=0.008]和OS(HR=0.508,95%CI:0.278-0.927,P=0.027)的改善独立相关:结论:IBP患者继续使用同一种PD-1抑制剂可获得临床疗效,是一种很有前景的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of cervical cancer education in two high schools in Ghana. Early-life antibiotic exposure aggravate the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes carrying miR-486-5p inhibit glycolysis and cell stemness in colorectal cancer by targeting NEK2. Investigating the role of non-synonymous variant D67N of ADGRE2 in chronic myeloid leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1