{"title":"Continuation of same programmed death-1 inhibitor regime beyond progression is a novel option for advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Jiasong Li, Fang Ding, Shasha Zhang, Yuanyuan Jia, Tianhang Zhang, Siqi Wang, Qingyi Liu, Zhanjun Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13063-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer is a significant global malignancy with poor prognosis. Although the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolonged the duration of survival, resistance and progression are inevitable. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We divided the advanced gastric cancer patients who received two lines immunotherapy into same regimen group (with same PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP) and different regimen group (with different PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP). Statistical analysis conducted to compare patient characteristics and evaluate survival differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The clinical outcome analysis showed that the same PD-1 inhibitor regime seemed to exhibit a higher disease control rate (DCR) (51.8% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.062), significantly prolonged progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) (162 vs. 75 days, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (312 vs. 166 days, P = 0.022) when compared with those of cross line. In the multivariate analysis, when using different regimen group as reference, the same regimen group was found to be independently associated with improved PFS2 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.267-0.816, P = 0.008] and OS (HR = 0.508, 95%CI: 0.278-0.927, P = 0.027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuation of the same type of PD-1 inhibitor regime in IBP shows clinical benefits and represents a promising therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13063-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer is a significant global malignancy with poor prognosis. Although the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prolonged the duration of survival, resistance and progression are inevitable. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP).
Method: We divided the advanced gastric cancer patients who received two lines immunotherapy into same regimen group (with same PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP) and different regimen group (with different PD-1 inhibitor regime after IBP). Statistical analysis conducted to compare patient characteristics and evaluate survival differences between groups.
Result: The clinical outcome analysis showed that the same PD-1 inhibitor regime seemed to exhibit a higher disease control rate (DCR) (51.8% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.062), significantly prolonged progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) (162 vs. 75 days, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (312 vs. 166 days, P = 0.022) when compared with those of cross line. In the multivariate analysis, when using different regimen group as reference, the same regimen group was found to be independently associated with improved PFS2 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.267-0.816, P = 0.008] and OS (HR = 0.508, 95%CI: 0.278-0.927, P = 0.027).
Conclusion: Continuation of the same type of PD-1 inhibitor regime in IBP shows clinical benefits and represents a promising therapeutic approach.
背景:胃癌是一种严重的全球性恶性肿瘤,预后较差。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现延长了患者的生存期,但耐药和进展是不可避免的。我们旨在评估程序性死亡-1(PD-1)抑制剂在进展期后免疫治疗(IBP)中的有效性:方法:我们将接受两线免疫治疗的晚期胃癌患者分为相同方案组(IBP后使用相同的PD-1抑制剂方案)和不同方案组(IBP后使用不同的PD-1抑制剂方案)。统计分析比较了患者特征,并评估了组间生存率差异:临床结果分析表明,与交叉方案相比,相同的PD-1抑制剂方案似乎表现出更高的疾病控制率(DCR)(51.8% vs. 29.2%,P = 0.062),显著延长无进展生存期2(PFS2)(162天 vs. 75天,P = 0.001)和总生存期(OS)(312天 vs. 166天,P = 0.022)。在多变量分析中,以不同方案组为参照,发现相同方案组与PFS2[危险比(HR)=0.467,95%置信区间(CI):0.267-0.816,P=0.008]和OS(HR=0.508,95%CI:0.278-0.927,P=0.027)的改善独立相关:结论:IBP患者继续使用同一种PD-1抑制剂可获得临床疗效,是一种很有前景的治疗方法。
期刊介绍:
BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.