Effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of docetaxel and ramucirumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13070-3
Yoshitaka Saito, Yoh Takekuma, Jun Sakakibara-Konishi, Yasushi Shimizu, Ichiro Kinoshita, Mitsuru Sugawara
{"title":"Effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of docetaxel and ramucirumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.","authors":"Yoshitaka Saito, Yoh Takekuma, Jun Sakakibara-Konishi, Yasushi Shimizu, Ichiro Kinoshita, Mitsuru Sugawara","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13070-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Docetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM) is one of the most effective regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. In our previous study, baseline anemia was identified as a preventive factor against the development of severe adverse effects during the first treatment cycle. It was hypothesized that anemia directly promotes tumor angiogenesis, leading to the elevation of RAM efficacy with increased DOC delivery to tumors, while reducing DOC delivery to other organs, potentially mitigating severe adverse effects. If this hypothesis is correct, patients with baseline anemia may have better clinical outcomes than those with normal hemoglobin levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of DOC + RAM in treating advanced NSCLC in a real-word setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced NSCLC receiving DOC + RAM (n = 72) were retrospectively assessed. They were categorized into a control group with normal baseline hemoglobin levels and an anemia group with baseline anemia. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the anemia group had a significantly shorter PFS than that of patients in the control group (median PFS: 3.2 and 6.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4.8 and 4.3-9.9 months, respectively;P = 0.008). In addition, the disease control rate in the anemia group was 65.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (93.6%; P = 0.007). Overall survival tended to be shorter in patients with anemia than in controls, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that baseline anemia was a singular risk factor for poor PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13; P = 0.02). The incidence of severe adverse effects did not differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the PFS of patients with anemia treated with DOC + RAM for advanced NSCLC is shorter than that of those without the symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13070-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Docetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM) is one of the most effective regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. In our previous study, baseline anemia was identified as a preventive factor against the development of severe adverse effects during the first treatment cycle. It was hypothesized that anemia directly promotes tumor angiogenesis, leading to the elevation of RAM efficacy with increased DOC delivery to tumors, while reducing DOC delivery to other organs, potentially mitigating severe adverse effects. If this hypothesis is correct, patients with baseline anemia may have better clinical outcomes than those with normal hemoglobin levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of DOC + RAM in treating advanced NSCLC in a real-word setting.

Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC receiving DOC + RAM (n = 72) were retrospectively assessed. They were categorized into a control group with normal baseline hemoglobin levels and an anemia group with baseline anemia. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation.

Results: Patients in the anemia group had a significantly shorter PFS than that of patients in the control group (median PFS: 3.2 and 6.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4.8 and 4.3-9.9 months, respectively;P = 0.008). In addition, the disease control rate in the anemia group was 65.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (93.6%; P = 0.007). Overall survival tended to be shorter in patients with anemia than in controls, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that baseline anemia was a singular risk factor for poor PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13; P = 0.02). The incidence of severe adverse effects did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the PFS of patients with anemia treated with DOC + RAM for advanced NSCLC is shorter than that of those without the symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基线贫血对多西他赛和雷莫芦单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效的影响
背景:多西他赛(DOC)联合雷莫芦单抗(RAM)是治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)最有效的方案之一。在我们之前的研究中,基线贫血被认为是第一个治疗周期中出现严重不良反应的一个预防因素。我们假设贫血会直接促进肿瘤血管生成,从而提高 RAM 的疗效,增加 DOC 向肿瘤的输送,同时减少 DOC 向其他器官的输送,从而减轻严重不良反应。如果这一假设是正确的,那么基线贫血患者的临床疗效可能比血红蛋白水平正常的患者更好。在本研究中,我们旨在调查基线贫血对 DOC + RAM 治疗晚期 NSCLC 疗效的影响:我们对接受 DOC + RAM 治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者(n = 72)进行了回顾性评估。他们被分为基线血红蛋白水平正常的对照组和基线贫血的贫血组。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)评估:贫血组患者的无进展生存期明显短于对照组(中位无进展生存期:分别为3.2个月和6.2个月;95%置信区间[CI]:分别为2.2-4.8个月和4.3-9.9个月;P = 0.008)。此外,贫血组的疾病控制率为65.8%,明显低于对照组(93.6%;P = 0.007)。贫血患者的总生存期往往短于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.07)。多变量 Cox 危险分析表明,基线贫血是 PFS 较差的单一危险因素(调整后危险比 1.84,95% CI 1.08-3.13;P = 0.02)。两组患者的严重不良反应发生率没有差异:本研究表明,晚期NSCLC贫血患者接受DOC+RAM治疗的PFS短于无贫血症状的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of cervical cancer education in two high schools in Ghana. Early-life antibiotic exposure aggravate the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes carrying miR-486-5p inhibit glycolysis and cell stemness in colorectal cancer by targeting NEK2. Investigating the role of non-synonymous variant D67N of ADGRE2 in chronic myeloid leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1