A new way to conceptualize intolerance of uncertainty among adolescents: Embracing the network perspective

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12736
Haoxian Ye, Xinyu Shi, Yunyi Li, Yike Huang, Ruiyan You, Xiangting Zhang, Zhijun Yu, Huolian Li, Fang Fan
{"title":"A new way to conceptualize intolerance of uncertainty among adolescents: Embracing the network perspective","authors":"Haoxian Ye,&nbsp;Xinyu Shi,&nbsp;Yunyi Li,&nbsp;Yike Huang,&nbsp;Ruiyan You,&nbsp;Xiangting Zhang,&nbsp;Zhijun Yu,&nbsp;Huolian Li,&nbsp;Fang Fan","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), a pivotal transdiagnostic risk factor in psychopathology, is defined as a dispositional incapacity to withstand uncertainty distress, driving maladaptive cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to uncertainty. However, the intricate interplay among these components, particularly in adolescents, remains underexplored; yet understanding this interplay is crucial for supporting mental health. To address this gap, we employed a network approach to conceptualize IU in 5672 non-clinical Chinese adolescents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.13 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 1.96 years, range = 10–19 years, 46.6% boys), combining graphical Gaussian models (GGM) and directed acyclic graphs (DAG). Our analyses revealed a tripartite network comprising cognitive, behavioural and emotional components. Notably, ‘frustration’ and ‘work with hindrance’ emerged as key drivers, while ‘catastrophizing belief’ served as a critical bridge linking different components. These findings underscore the importance of alleviating uncertainty-induced frustration and enhancing coping skills for behavioural impediments to mitigate adolescent IU. Additionally, therapeutic interventions should prioritize modifying and re-evaluating catastrophizing beliefs related to uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"116 1","pages":"89-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), a pivotal transdiagnostic risk factor in psychopathology, is defined as a dispositional incapacity to withstand uncertainty distress, driving maladaptive cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to uncertainty. However, the intricate interplay among these components, particularly in adolescents, remains underexplored; yet understanding this interplay is crucial for supporting mental health. To address this gap, we employed a network approach to conceptualize IU in 5672 non-clinical Chinese adolescents (Mage = 14.13 years, SDage = 1.96 years, range = 10–19 years, 46.6% boys), combining graphical Gaussian models (GGM) and directed acyclic graphs (DAG). Our analyses revealed a tripartite network comprising cognitive, behavioural and emotional components. Notably, ‘frustration’ and ‘work with hindrance’ emerged as key drivers, while ‘catastrophizing belief’ served as a critical bridge linking different components. These findings underscore the importance of alleviating uncertainty-induced frustration and enhancing coping skills for behavioural impediments to mitigate adolescent IU. Additionally, therapeutic interventions should prioritize modifying and re-evaluating catastrophizing beliefs related to uncertainty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年不容忍不确定性的新概念:采用网络视角。
对不确定性的不容忍(IU)是精神病理学中一个关键的跨诊断风险因素,被定义为一种无法承受不确定性困扰的倾向性能力,促使人们对不确定性做出不适应的认知、情感和行为反应。然而,这些因素之间错综复杂的相互作用,尤其是在青少年中,仍未得到充分探索;然而,了解这种相互作用对于支持心理健康至关重要。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了一种网络方法,结合图形高斯模型(GGM)和有向无环图(DAG),对5672名非临床中国青少年(年龄最大=14.13岁,最小=1.96岁,年龄范围=10-19岁,46.6%为男孩)的不确定性因素进行概念化。我们的分析揭示了一个由认知、行为和情绪三部分组成的三方网络。值得注意的是,"挫折感 "和 "工作障碍 "是关键的驱动因素,而 "灾难化信念 "则是连接不同因素的重要桥梁。这些发现强调了减轻不确定性引起的挫折感和提高应对行为障碍的技能对减轻青少年 IU 的重要性。此外,治疗干预措施应优先考虑修改和重新评估与不确定性有关的灾难化信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Habitus of doubt? The role of social class narcissism in shaping psychological help conspiracy beliefs. Relations among daily symptoms of depression. Issue Information Unveiling the factors of aesthetic preferences with explainable AI Explanation strategies in humans versus current explainable artificial intelligence: Insights from image classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1