Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: a multicenter diagnostic study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae197
Yang Gu, Jiawei Tian, Haitao Ran, Weidong Ren, Cai Chang, Jianjun Yuan, Chunsong Kang, Youbin Deng, Hui Wang, Baoming Luo, Shenglan Guo, Qi Zhou, Ensheng Xue, Weiwei Zhan, Qing Zhou, Jie Li, Ping Zhou, Chunquan Zhang, Man Chen, Ying Gu, Jinfeng Xu, Wu Chen, Yuhong Zhang, Jianchu Li, Hongyan Wang, Yuxin Jiang
{"title":"Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: a multicenter diagnostic study.","authors":"Yang Gu, Jiawei Tian, Haitao Ran, Weidong Ren, Cai Chang, Jianjun Yuan, Chunsong Kang, Youbin Deng, Hui Wang, Baoming Luo, Shenglan Guo, Qi Zhou, Ensheng Xue, Weiwei Zhan, Qing Zhou, Jie Li, Ping Zhou, Chunquan Zhang, Man Chen, Ying Gu, Jinfeng Xu, Wu Chen, Yuhong Zhang, Jianchu Li, Hongyan Wang, Yuxin Jiang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the added value of strain elastography (SE) by recategorizing ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4371 patients underwent US and SE with BI-RADS 2-5 categories solid breast lesions were included from thirty-two hospitals. We evaluated the elastographic images according to elasticity scores (ES) and strain ratios (SR). Three combined methods (BI-RADS+ES, BI-RADS+SR, BI-RADS+ES+SR) and two reclassified methods were used (method one: upgrading BI-RADS 3 and downgrading BI-RADS 4a, method two: downgrading BI-RADS 4a alone). The diagnostic performance and the potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combining BI-RADS with SE had a higher area under the curve (AUC) than BI-RADS alone (0.822-0.898 vs. 0.794, P<0.01). For reclassified method one, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 99.36%, 66.70%, 78.36% for BI-RADS+ES and 98.01%, 66.45%, 77.72% for BI-RADS+SR, and 99.42%, 66.70%, 78.38% for BI-RADS+ES+SR, respectively. For reclassified method two, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 99.17%, 70.72%, 80.87% for BI-RADS+ES and 97.76%, 81.75%, 87.46% for BI-RADS+SR, and 99.23%, 69.83%, 80.32% for BI-RADS+ES+SR, respectively. Downgrading BI-RADS 4a alone had higher AUC, specificity, and accuracy (P<0.01) and similar sensitivity (P>0.05) to upgrading BI-RADS 3 and downgrading BI-RADS 4a. Combining SE with BI-RADS could help reduce unnecessary biopsies by 17.64%-55.20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining BI-RADS with SE improved the diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions and could decrease false-positive breast biopsy rates. Downgrading BI-RADS 4a lesions alone might be sufficient for achieving good diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Downgrading BI-RADS category 4a lesions alone had higher AUC, specificity, and accuracy, and similar sensitivity to upgrading or downgrading BI-RADS category 3 and 4a lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the added value of strain elastography (SE) by recategorizing ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a lesions.

Methods: A total of 4371 patients underwent US and SE with BI-RADS 2-5 categories solid breast lesions were included from thirty-two hospitals. We evaluated the elastographic images according to elasticity scores (ES) and strain ratios (SR). Three combined methods (BI-RADS+ES, BI-RADS+SR, BI-RADS+ES+SR) and two reclassified methods were used (method one: upgrading BI-RADS 3 and downgrading BI-RADS 4a, method two: downgrading BI-RADS 4a alone). The diagnostic performance and the potential reduction of unnecessary biopsies were evaluated.

Results: Combining BI-RADS with SE had a higher area under the curve (AUC) than BI-RADS alone (0.822-0.898 vs. 0.794, P<0.01). For reclassified method one, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 99.36%, 66.70%, 78.36% for BI-RADS+ES and 98.01%, 66.45%, 77.72% for BI-RADS+SR, and 99.42%, 66.70%, 78.38% for BI-RADS+ES+SR, respectively. For reclassified method two, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 99.17%, 70.72%, 80.87% for BI-RADS+ES and 97.76%, 81.75%, 87.46% for BI-RADS+SR, and 99.23%, 69.83%, 80.32% for BI-RADS+ES+SR, respectively. Downgrading BI-RADS 4a alone had higher AUC, specificity, and accuracy (P<0.01) and similar sensitivity (P>0.05) to upgrading BI-RADS 3 and downgrading BI-RADS 4a. Combining SE with BI-RADS could help reduce unnecessary biopsies by 17.64%-55.20%.

Conclusions: Combining BI-RADS with SE improved the diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions and could decrease false-positive breast biopsy rates. Downgrading BI-RADS 4a lesions alone might be sufficient for achieving good diagnostic performance.

Advances in knowledge: Downgrading BI-RADS category 4a lesions alone had higher AUC, specificity, and accuracy, and similar sensitivity to upgrading or downgrading BI-RADS category 3 and 4a lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过对 BI-RADS 3 和 4a 病变进行重新分类,利用超声应变弹性成像提高乳腺病变的诊断性能:一项多中心诊断研究。
目的通过对超声(US)乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3和4a病变进行重新分类,研究应变弹性成像(SE)的附加值:32家医院的4371名患者接受了超声和SE检查,其中包括BI-RADS 2-5类乳腺实性病变。我们根据弹性评分(ES)和应变比(SR)对弹性图像进行了评估。我们采用了三种组合方法(BI-RADS+ES、BI-RADS+SR、BI-RADS+ES+SR)和两种重新分类方法(方法一:将 BI-RADS 3 升级并将 BI-RADS 4a 降级;方法二:仅将 BI-RADS 4a 降级)。对诊断效果和减少不必要活检的可能性进行了评估:与单独使用 BI-RADS 相比,将 BI-RADS 与 SE 结合使用的曲线下面积(AUC)更高(0.822-0.898 vs. 0.794,P0.05),可提升 BI-RADS 3 和降低 BI-RADS 4a。将 SE 与 BI-RADS 结合使用可帮助减少 17.64%-55.20% 的不必要活检:将 BI-RADS 与 SE 结合可提高良性与恶性病变的诊断性能,并可降低乳腺活检的假阳性率。仅将 BI-RADS 4a 病变降级可能就足以达到良好的诊断效果:单独降低 BI-RADS 4a 类病变的 AUC、特异性和准确性更高,敏感性与提升或降低 BI-RADS 3 类和 4a 类病变相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Children's bone age development is delayed with increasing altitude: a multicentre study. Striving for excellence: multicentre quality improvement project to optimize CT KUB technique in renal colic patients. Assessment of interstitial lung disease in a systemic sclerosis patient cohort using photon-counting detector CT with ultra-high resolution and a 1024-pixel image matrix. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib/camrelizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic arterioportal shunts. Sister partnership to overcome the global burden of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1