Michel Al Achkar MD, Georges Khattar MD, Samer Asmar MD, Michel El Khoury MD, Fares Saliba MD, MBA, Laurence Aoun MD, Ibrahim Al Saidi MD, Ghada Araji MD, Salman Khan MD, Elie Bou Sanayeh MD, MBA, Mitchell Weinberg MD, MBA, Alexander Bershadskiy MD
{"title":"Clots and bleeds: the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in hemophilia patients with acute coronary syndrome","authors":"Michel Al Achkar MD, Georges Khattar MD, Samer Asmar MD, Michel El Khoury MD, Fares Saliba MD, MBA, Laurence Aoun MD, Ibrahim Al Saidi MD, Ghada Araji MD, Salman Khan MD, Elie Bou Sanayeh MD, MBA, Mitchell Weinberg MD, MBA, Alexander Bershadskiy MD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hemophilia is a disease characterized by a high risk of bleeding. With advances in treatment, life expectancy and aging-associated diseases such as coronary artery disease have increased. Our primary objective is to assess for major adverse outcomes, mortality, and length of hospital stay in individuals with hemophilia presenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) for 2018 to investigate the outcomes of ACS management with PCI in adults with and without hemophilia. We used ICD-10 codes to exclude patients with significant comorbidities and identify those with ACS undergoing PCI. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were employed to account for over 20 baseline characteristics, mitigating confounding factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (11.0% vs. 2.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), hemorrhagic stroke (10.0% vs. 1.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and retroperitoneal hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 1.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was significantly higher in individuals with hemophilia undergoing PCI compared to those without hemophilia. Additionally, venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence was notably higher in the hemophilia cohort (6.6% vs. 2.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.027). The hemophilia cohort also experienced a higher mortality rate (7.1% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and longer hospital stays.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with hemophilia undergoing PCI are at a significantly greater risk of adverse events, increased mortality, and longer hospital stays than the general population. To mitigate the risk of unfavorable outcomes, it is crucial to ensure adequate replenishment of coagulation factors and establish close collaboration between cardiologists and hematologists.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"104 7","pages":"1387-1395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Hemophilia is a disease characterized by a high risk of bleeding. With advances in treatment, life expectancy and aging-associated diseases such as coronary artery disease have increased. Our primary objective is to assess for major adverse outcomes, mortality, and length of hospital stay in individuals with hemophilia presenting for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods
Our retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) for 2018 to investigate the outcomes of ACS management with PCI in adults with and without hemophilia. We used ICD-10 codes to exclude patients with significant comorbidities and identify those with ACS undergoing PCI. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were employed to account for over 20 baseline characteristics, mitigating confounding factors.
Results
The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (11.0% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001), hemorrhagic stroke (10.0% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001), and retroperitoneal hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in individuals with hemophilia undergoing PCI compared to those without hemophilia. Additionally, venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence was notably higher in the hemophilia cohort (6.6% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.027). The hemophilia cohort also experienced a higher mortality rate (7.1% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.037) and longer hospital stays.
Conclusion
Patients with hemophilia undergoing PCI are at a significantly greater risk of adverse events, increased mortality, and longer hospital stays than the general population. To mitigate the risk of unfavorable outcomes, it is crucial to ensure adequate replenishment of coagulation factors and establish close collaboration between cardiologists and hematologists.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.