Impact of Heart Transplant Allocation Change on Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation: Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011621
Anjan Tibrewala, Sarah Chuzi, Tingqing Wu, Abigail S Baldridge, Rebecca Harap, Benjamin Bryner, Duc Thinh Pham, Jane E Wilcox
{"title":"Impact of Heart Transplant Allocation Change on Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Mortality in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.","authors":"Anjan Tibrewala, Sarah Chuzi, Tingqing Wu, Abigail S Baldridge, Rebecca Harap, Benjamin Bryner, Duc Thinh Pham, Jane E Wilcox","doi":"10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In October 2018, the US heart transplant (HT) allocation system was revised giving patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) intermediate priority status. Few studies have examined the impact of this policy change on outcomes among patients with LVAD. We sought to determine how the allocation change impacted waitlist and posttransplant mortality in patients with LVAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for patients with LVAD who were listed for or underwent HT between October 2016 and October 2021. We evaluated waitlist mortality using competing risks analysis and a multivariable Fine-Gray model, and posttransplant mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed data from 3835 patients with LVAD listed for HT and 3486 patients with LVAD who underwent HT during the study period. Listing for HT preallocation change was significantly associated with an increased risk of waitlist mortality (Gray <i>P</i>=0.0058) compared with postallocation change. After adjustment for covariates, mortality differences by listing era were attenuated, but LVAD brand was significantly associated with waitlist mortality (HM3 versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.69]; <i>P</i>=0.002; HVAD versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.30]; <i>P</i>=0.36; overall <i>P</i>=0.004). In contrast, HT postallocation change was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.0172) compared with preallocation change. In a multivariable analysis, the association with posttransplant mortality between transplant eras was attenuated, but ischemic time (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.26]; <i>P</i><0.001) and status at time of HT (Status 1-3 versus 4; hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.61]; <i>P</i>=0.02) were significantly associated with posttransplant mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with LVAD, lower waitlist mortality postallocation change was likely driven by improved LVAD technology. Higher posttransplant mortality following the allocation change was largely attributable to longer ischemic times and patient acuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10196,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"e011621"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011621","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In October 2018, the US heart transplant (HT) allocation system was revised giving patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) intermediate priority status. Few studies have examined the impact of this policy change on outcomes among patients with LVAD. We sought to determine how the allocation change impacted waitlist and posttransplant mortality in patients with LVAD.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for patients with LVAD who were listed for or underwent HT between October 2016 and October 2021. We evaluated waitlist mortality using competing risks analysis and a multivariable Fine-Gray model, and posttransplant mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate proportional hazards model.

Results: We analyzed data from 3835 patients with LVAD listed for HT and 3486 patients with LVAD who underwent HT during the study period. Listing for HT preallocation change was significantly associated with an increased risk of waitlist mortality (Gray P=0.0058) compared with postallocation change. After adjustment for covariates, mortality differences by listing era were attenuated, but LVAD brand was significantly associated with waitlist mortality (HM3 versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.69]; P=0.002; HVAD versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.30]; P=0.36; overall P=0.004). In contrast, HT postallocation change was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (log-rank P=0.0172) compared with preallocation change. In a multivariable analysis, the association with posttransplant mortality between transplant eras was attenuated, but ischemic time (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.26]; P<0.001) and status at time of HT (Status 1-3 versus 4; hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.61]; P=0.02) were significantly associated with posttransplant mortality.

Conclusions: Among patients with LVAD, lower waitlist mortality postallocation change was likely driven by improved LVAD technology. Higher posttransplant mortality following the allocation change was largely attributable to longer ischemic times and patient acuity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏移植分配变化对左心室辅助装置患者候诊死亡率和移植后死亡率的影响
背景:2018 年 10 月,美国心脏移植(HT)分配系统进行了修订,给予左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中间优先地位。很少有研究考察了这一政策变化对 LVAD 患者预后的影响。我们试图确定分配变化如何影响 LVAD 患者的候补名单和移植后死亡率:我们回顾性地评估了器官共享联合网络登记册中在 2016 年 10 月至 2021 年 10 月期间列入或接受 HT 的 LVAD 患者。我们使用竞争风险分析和多变量 Fine-Gray 模型评估了候补名单死亡率,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和多变量比例危险模型评估了移植后死亡率:我们分析了在研究期间列入 HT 的 3835 名 LVAD 患者和接受 HT 的 3486 名 LVAD 患者的数据。与分配变化后相比,在分配变化前列入 HT 与候补名单死亡风险增加显著相关(灰色 P=0.0058)。对协变量进行调整后,不同上市年代的死亡率差异有所减弱,但 LVAD 品牌与候补名单死亡率显著相关(HM3 与 HMII 相比;危险比为 0.38 [95% CI,0.21-0.69];P=0.002;HVAD 与 HMII 相比;危险比为 0.79 [95% CI,0.48-1.30];P=0.36;总体 P=0.004)。相反,与配型前相比,HT配型后的变化与移植后死亡率增加有关(对数秩P=0.0172)。在多变量分析中,移植年代之间与移植后死亡率的相关性减弱,但缺血时间(危险比,1.16 [95% CI,1.07-1.26];PP=0.02)与移植后死亡率显著相关:结论:在使用 LVAD 的患者中,LVAD 技术的改进可能会降低分配改变后的候补名单死亡率。结论:在LVAD患者中,分配改变后等待者死亡率较低可能是由于LVAD技术的改进,而分配改变后移植后死亡率较高主要是由于缺血时间较长和患者敏锐度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Heart Failure
Circulation: Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
271
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Heart Failure focuses on content related to heart failure, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant science and medicine. It considers studies conducted in humans or analyses of human data, as well as preclinical studies with direct clinical correlation or relevance. While primarily a clinical journal, it may publish novel basic and preclinical studies that significantly advance the field of heart failure.
期刊最新文献
Natural Language Processing to Adjudicate Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Global Clinical Trials. A Medical Expert System for Intelligent Telemonitoring of Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Preliminary Validation and Perspectives. Comprehensive Proteomics Profiling Identifies Circulating Biomarkers to Distinguish Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Other Cardiomyopathies with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Mavacamten: Real-World Experience from 22 Months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1