Maximizing Breast Cancer Detection Through Screening: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Approaches.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.012
Matthew F Covington
{"title":"Maximizing Breast Cancer Detection Through Screening: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Approaches.","authors":"Matthew F Covington","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>This study estimates the percentage of detectable breast cancers in the screening population that could be found with primary and supplemental screening, and provides cost estimates for population wide supplemental screening in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Published estimates on cancer detection rates of 2D mammography, tomosynthesis (DBT), whole breast ultrasound (US), molecular breast imaging (MBI), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), and MRI, the number of mammograms conducted in the United States in 2023, and the proportion of dense breast tissue, were utilized. The maximum number of detectable cancers was projected from incremental cancer detection rates of the most sensitive supplemental screening method. The proportion of cancers detectable for each modality was calculated. In 2023, Medicare reimbursement rates were used to estimate supplemental screening costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 469,437 detectable cancers, 2D mammography could detect 190,531 (41%), leaving 278,906 undetected. Adding supplemental screening could detect a combined 220,165 cancers (47%) with DBT, 237,596 (51%) with US, 331,727 (71%) with MBI, 377,049 (80%) with CEM and 469,437 (100%) with MRI. The imaging cost in US dollars to provide supplemental screening to all individuals with dense breasts in 2023 was $933M for tomosynthesis, $1.84B for US, $3.87B for CEM, $4.16B for MBI, and $6.36B for MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights potential benefits from supplemental breast cancer screening, suggesting the combination of mammography and breast MRI offers the most effective detection method though at the highest imaging cost. These findings provide valuable insights to guide future research and inform decision-making in supplemental breast cancer screening strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/background: This study estimates the percentage of detectable breast cancers in the screening population that could be found with primary and supplemental screening, and provides cost estimates for population wide supplemental screening in the U.S.

Materials and methods: Published estimates on cancer detection rates of 2D mammography, tomosynthesis (DBT), whole breast ultrasound (US), molecular breast imaging (MBI), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), and MRI, the number of mammograms conducted in the United States in 2023, and the proportion of dense breast tissue, were utilized. The maximum number of detectable cancers was projected from incremental cancer detection rates of the most sensitive supplemental screening method. The proportion of cancers detectable for each modality was calculated. In 2023, Medicare reimbursement rates were used to estimate supplemental screening costs.

Results: Out of 469,437 detectable cancers, 2D mammography could detect 190,531 (41%), leaving 278,906 undetected. Adding supplemental screening could detect a combined 220,165 cancers (47%) with DBT, 237,596 (51%) with US, 331,727 (71%) with MBI, 377,049 (80%) with CEM and 469,437 (100%) with MRI. The imaging cost in US dollars to provide supplemental screening to all individuals with dense breasts in 2023 was $933M for tomosynthesis, $1.84B for US, $3.87B for CEM, $4.16B for MBI, and $6.36B for MRI.

Conclusion: The study highlights potential benefits from supplemental breast cancer screening, suggesting the combination of mammography and breast MRI offers the most effective detection method though at the highest imaging cost. These findings provide valuable insights to guide future research and inform decision-making in supplemental breast cancer screening strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过筛查最大限度地发现乳腺癌:基于成像方法的比较分析。
简介/背景:本研究估算了通过初筛和补充筛查可发现的乳腺癌在筛查人群中所占的比例,并提供了美国全民补充筛查的成本估算:利用已公布的二维乳腺X光摄影、断层扫描(DBT)、全乳超声波(US)、分子乳腺成像(MBI)、对比增强乳腺X光摄影(CEM)和核磁共振成像的癌症检出率估算值、2023年美国进行乳腺X光摄影的数量以及致密乳腺组织的比例。根据最敏感的补充筛查方法的增量癌症检出率,推算出可检出癌症的最大数量。计算出每种方式可检测到的癌症比例。2023 年,医疗保险报销率用于估算补充筛查成本:在 469,437 例可检测出的癌症中,二维乳腺 X 光检查可检测出 190,531 例(41%),还有 278,906 例未检测出。增加补充筛查后,DBT 共可检测出 220,165 例癌症(47%),US 共可检测出 237,596 例癌症(51%),MBI 共可检测出 331,727 例癌症(71%),CEM 共可检测出 377,049 例癌症(80%),MRI 共可检测出 469,437 例癌症(100%)。2023 年为所有致密乳房患者提供补充筛查的成像成本(以美元计)为:断层合成 9.33 亿美元、US 18.4 亿美元、CEM 38.7 亿美元、MBI 41.6 亿美元、MRI 63.6 亿美元:该研究强调了补充性乳腺癌筛查的潜在益处,表明乳腺 X 线照相术和乳腺核磁共振成像的结合提供了最有效的检测方法,但成像成本最高。这些发现为指导未来的研究提供了宝贵的见解,并为辅助乳腺癌筛查策略的决策提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathologic Features and Digital Imaging Analysis of HER2 Protein in Breast Carcinomas With Different HER2 Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Patterns. USP4/CARM1 Axis Promotes the Malignant Transformation of Breast Cancer Cells by Upregulating SLC7A11 Expression. Disparities in Hereditary Genetic Testing in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index is a Predictor of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer. Comparison of [18F] FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Detection of Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1