The prevalence of small intestine bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome is much higher with lactulose than glucose breath test: Results of a retrospective monocentric study
François Mion , Fabien Subtil , Christelle Machon , Sabine Roman , Anne Mialon
{"title":"The prevalence of small intestine bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome is much higher with lactulose than glucose breath test: Results of a retrospective monocentric study","authors":"François Mion , Fabien Subtil , Christelle Machon , Sabine Roman , Anne Mialon","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Glucose (GBT) and lactulose (LBT) breath tests have been recommended for the diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). LBT may yield a higher prevalence of SIBO diagnosis, because of its limited small bowel absorption, and therefore colonic fermentation. The aim of this retrospective study was to confirm this hypothesis, in irritable bowel syndrome patients (IBS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Among a cohort of 995 patients who underwent GBT or LBT, 287 with typical IBS according to Rome IV criteria, without past digestive surgery or significant medical comorbidities, were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>155 IBS patients underwent GBT, and 132 LBT (71% women, mean age 45±15, mean BMI: 22.6±4.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). There were no difference between both groups in terms of demographics, IBS type and severity of symptoms. The prevalence of SIBO according to LBT was 47%, versus 4.5% only with GBT (p<0.001). The prevalence of methane values ≥ 10 ppm were similar in both groups (34%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LBT is very frequently positive in IBS patients, as compared to GBT. The 2 tests are thus not interchangeable for the diagnosis of SIBO. Furthermore, the positivity of both tests was not correlated with symptoms, which may indicate a poor clinical interest of these tests in IBS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"48 9","pages":"Article 102482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124002031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Glucose (GBT) and lactulose (LBT) breath tests have been recommended for the diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). LBT may yield a higher prevalence of SIBO diagnosis, because of its limited small bowel absorption, and therefore colonic fermentation. The aim of this retrospective study was to confirm this hypothesis, in irritable bowel syndrome patients (IBS).
Methods
Among a cohort of 995 patients who underwent GBT or LBT, 287 with typical IBS according to Rome IV criteria, without past digestive surgery or significant medical comorbidities, were included.
Results
155 IBS patients underwent GBT, and 132 LBT (71% women, mean age 45±15, mean BMI: 22.6±4.3 kg/m2). There were no difference between both groups in terms of demographics, IBS type and severity of symptoms. The prevalence of SIBO according to LBT was 47%, versus 4.5% only with GBT (p<0.001). The prevalence of methane values ≥ 10 ppm were similar in both groups (34%).
Conclusion
LBT is very frequently positive in IBS patients, as compared to GBT. The 2 tests are thus not interchangeable for the diagnosis of SIBO. Furthermore, the positivity of both tests was not correlated with symptoms, which may indicate a poor clinical interest of these tests in IBS.
期刊介绍:
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct).
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.