Ángelo Basso, Fernando Salas, Marcela Hernández, Alejandra Fernández, Alfredo Sierra, Constanza Jiménez
{"title":"Machine learning and deep learning models for the diagnosis of apical periodontitis: a scoping review.","authors":"Ángelo Basso, Fernando Salas, Marcela Hernández, Alejandra Fernández, Alfredo Sierra, Constanza Jiménez","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05989-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the existing literature on the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP) in humans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. The PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases were searched, focusing on articles using ML/DL approaches for AP diagnosis. No restrictions were applied. Two independent reviewers screened publications and charted data in predefined Excel tables for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen publications focused on diagnosing AP by identifying periapical radiolucent lesions (PRLs) in dental radiographs were included. The average sensitivity and specificity for reviewed models were 83% and 90%, respectively. Only three studies explored the direct impact of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on clinicians' diagnostic performance. Both consistently showed improved sensitivity without compromising specificity. Significant variability in dataset sizes, labeling techniques, and algorithm configurations was noticed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings affirm AI models' effectiveness and transformative potential in diagnosing AP by improving the accurate detection of periapical radiolucencies using dental radiographs. However, the lack of standardized reporting on crucial aspects of methodology and performance metrics prevents establishing a definitive diagnostic approach using AI. Further studies are needed to expand AI applications in AP diagnosis beyond radiographic analysis.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>AI can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy in AP diagnosis by enhancing the sensitivity of PRL detection in dental radiographs without compromising specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05989-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the existing literature on the use of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for diagnosing apical periodontitis (AP) in humans.
Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. The PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases were searched, focusing on articles using ML/DL approaches for AP diagnosis. No restrictions were applied. Two independent reviewers screened publications and charted data in predefined Excel tables for analysis.
Results: Nineteen publications focused on diagnosing AP by identifying periapical radiolucent lesions (PRLs) in dental radiographs were included. The average sensitivity and specificity for reviewed models were 83% and 90%, respectively. Only three studies explored the direct impact of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on clinicians' diagnostic performance. Both consistently showed improved sensitivity without compromising specificity. Significant variability in dataset sizes, labeling techniques, and algorithm configurations was noticed.
Conclusions: Findings affirm AI models' effectiveness and transformative potential in diagnosing AP by improving the accurate detection of periapical radiolucencies using dental radiographs. However, the lack of standardized reporting on crucial aspects of methodology and performance metrics prevents establishing a definitive diagnostic approach using AI. Further studies are needed to expand AI applications in AP diagnosis beyond radiographic analysis.
Clinical relevance: AI can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy in AP diagnosis by enhancing the sensitivity of PRL detection in dental radiographs without compromising specificity.
目的评估关于使用机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)模型诊断人类根尖牙周炎(AP)的现有文献:按照Arksey和O'Malley的框架进行了范围审查。检索了 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 Web of Science 数据库,重点关注使用 ML/DL 方法诊断 AP 的文章。未作任何限制。两位独立审稿人对出版物进行了筛选,并将数据绘制到预定义的 Excel 表格中进行分析:结果:共收录了 19 篇通过识别牙科 X 光片上的根尖周放射性病变 (PRL) 来诊断 AP 的文章。所审查模型的平均灵敏度和特异度分别为 83% 和 90%。只有三项研究探讨了人工智能(AI)辅助对临床医生诊断表现的直接影响。这两项研究都一致表明,灵敏度得到了提高,但特异性并未受到影响。在数据集大小、标记技术和算法配置方面存在显著差异:研究结果肯定了人工智能模型在诊断 AP 方面的有效性和变革潜力,因为它提高了使用牙科 X 光片准确检测根尖周放射状突起的能力。然而,由于在方法论和性能指标的关键方面缺乏标准化报告,因此无法使用人工智能建立明确的诊断方法。还需要进一步研究,以扩大人工智能在牙髓炎诊断中的应用,而不仅仅局限于射线分析:人工智能可以在不影响特异性的情况下提高牙科X光片中PRL检测的灵敏度,从而提高AP诊断的准确性。
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.