FOXN3-AS1: A Candidate Prognostic Marker and Epigenetic Target with Immunotherapeutic Implications in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Abstract

Aim: We focused on the FOXN3 gene and selected its antisense transcripts (FOXN3-AS1) to investigate its potential involvement in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Background: Several integrated multi-omics datasets have expanded the horizons of the cancer landscape. With the emergence of new high-throughput technologies, a large number of non-coding RNAs have been confirmed to be involved in the pathogenesis of different types of hematological malignancies.

Methods: We conducted experimental validation using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with bone marrow specimens from AML patients. Then, Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to substantiate the prognostic association between FOXN3-AS1 and AML patients within the TCGA database. Correlation between FOXN3-AS1 expression and gene mutation, immune, and immune function using Spearman correlation analysis. To explore the physical and functional interaction between FOXN3-AS1 and the DNMT1 protein, we utilized the RPISeq web tool from Iowa State University. Subsequently, we performed qPCR experiments to test the effect of 5AzaC (DNMT1 inhibitor) on FOXN3-AS1 expression AML cell lines (THP1 and OCI-AML3). We leveraged the "OncoPredict" R package in conjunction with the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity (GDSC) database to predict drug response in AML patients expressing FOXN3-AS1.

Results: We observed a significant upregulation of FOXN3-AS1 expression in AML patients compared to healthy controls using clinical samples. The TCGA database revealed an association between high FOXN3-AS1 expression and adverse prognosis. In our subsequent analysis, genes with poor prognostic implications in AML patients were exclusively identified in the FOXN3-AS1 high-expression group, further corroborating this relationship. AML patients with higher FOXN3-AS1 expression levels may respond less optimally to immunotherapy than patients with lower levels. Besides, we computationally predicted the interaction of FOXN3- AS1 and DNMT1 protein and experimentally confirmed that DNMT1i (GSK-3484862) affects the expression level of FOXN3-AS1. We also found that the chemotherapy drugs (5-Fluorouralic, Cisplatin, Dactolisib, Sapitinib, Temozolomide, Ulixertinib, Vinorelbine, Ruxolitinib, Osimertinib and Cisplatin) showed favorable responses in AML patients with high FOXN3-AS1 expression levels.

Conclusion: Our candidate approach identifies FOXN3-AS1 as a prognostic indicator of survival in AML with a potential immune-related role. The preliminary observations we made on FOXN3-AS1/DNMT1 crosstalk warrant more in-depth invested immunotherapeutic approaches in AML.