Digital Health Interventions Are Effective for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08672-7
Adrijana D'Silva, Nicolle Hua, Mary V Modayil, Judy Seidel, Deborah A Marshall
{"title":"Digital Health Interventions Are Effective for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Adrijana D'Silva, Nicolle Hua, Mary V Modayil, Judy Seidel, Deborah A Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08672-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health interventions (DHIs) could be a valuable self-management tool for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but little research exists on IBS-focused DHIs and their effectiveness. This review aimed to identify DHIs for IBS and evaluate their characteristics, effectiveness, and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study team, including patient partners, conducted a systematic review using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL from database inception to May 2024. Experimental and observational studies evaluating DHIs designed for use by IBS patients were included. Data extraction and assessment included study and DHI characteristics, effectiveness outcomes (symptom severity, quality of life, psychological indices, patient empowerment), and feasibility measures (adherence, usability, user satisfaction). Study quality and bias were assessed using a modified checklist of Downs and Black.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 929 identified, 13 studies of DHIs were included and deemed good quality on average (21,510 total participants) with six primary areas of focus: education, diet, brain-gut behavior skills, physiological support, health monitoring, and community engagement. Most DHIs were self-directed and reported statistically significant improvements in most effectiveness outcomes. Evidence suggests that DHIs focusing on brain-gut behavior skills or health monitoring may be most effective compared to other types of DHIs. However, their feasibility remains unclear, and the generalization of their impacts is limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores the potential of DHIs in supporting IBS patients and improving their outcomes. However, additional research is warranted for continued intervention use in this population, including assessments on feasibility, safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient empowerment and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08672-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions (DHIs) could be a valuable self-management tool for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but little research exists on IBS-focused DHIs and their effectiveness. This review aimed to identify DHIs for IBS and evaluate their characteristics, effectiveness, and feasibility.

Methods: Our study team, including patient partners, conducted a systematic review using Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL from database inception to May 2024. Experimental and observational studies evaluating DHIs designed for use by IBS patients were included. Data extraction and assessment included study and DHI characteristics, effectiveness outcomes (symptom severity, quality of life, psychological indices, patient empowerment), and feasibility measures (adherence, usability, user satisfaction). Study quality and bias were assessed using a modified checklist of Downs and Black.

Results: Of the 929 identified, 13 studies of DHIs were included and deemed good quality on average (21,510 total participants) with six primary areas of focus: education, diet, brain-gut behavior skills, physiological support, health monitoring, and community engagement. Most DHIs were self-directed and reported statistically significant improvements in most effectiveness outcomes. Evidence suggests that DHIs focusing on brain-gut behavior skills or health monitoring may be most effective compared to other types of DHIs. However, their feasibility remains unclear, and the generalization of their impacts is limited.

Conclusion: This review underscores the potential of DHIs in supporting IBS patients and improving their outcomes. However, additional research is warranted for continued intervention use in this population, including assessments on feasibility, safety, cost-effectiveness, and patient empowerment and experiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字健康干预对肠易激综合征的自我管理有效:系统回顾
背景:数字健康干预(DHIs)可以成为肠易激综合征(IBS)患者进行自我管理的重要工具,但有关以IBS为重点的DHIs及其有效性的研究却很少。本综述旨在确定针对肠易激综合征的 DHIs,并评估其特点、有效性和可行性:我们的研究团队(包括患者合作伙伴)使用 Medline、PsycINFO、Embase、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 进行了一项系统性综述,时间从数据库建立之初至 2024 年 5 月。研究纳入了评估肠易激综合征患者使用的 DHIs 的实验性和观察性研究。数据提取和评估包括研究和 DHI 特性、有效性结果(症状严重程度、生活质量、心理指数、患者能力)和可行性测量(依从性、可用性、用户满意度)。研究质量和偏倚采用唐斯和布莱克的修改清单进行评估:在确定的 929 项研究中,有 13 项关于 DHIs 的研究被纳入其中,并被认为平均质量良好(总参与人数达 21,510 人),主要关注六个方面:教育、饮食、脑-肠行为技能、生理支持、健康监测和社区参与。大多数 DHI 都是自主开展的,并报告称大多数疗效结果都有显著的统计学改善。有证据表明,与其他类型的 DHI 相比,侧重于脑肠行为技能或健康监测的 DHI 可能最为有效。然而,它们的可行性仍不明确,其影响的普遍性也很有限:本综述强调了定向健康指导在支持肠易激综合征患者和改善其预后方面的潜力。然而,要在这一人群中继续使用干预措施,还需要进行更多的研究,包括对可行性、安全性、成本效益以及患者能力和体验进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Country Comfort? Risk Factors for Unplanned Healthcare Visits in Rural America in Children with IBD. Preventive Measures and Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. A Case of Imaging-Negative Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosed by Novel Spyglass Transoral Cholangioscope. Association of Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa in the Upper Esophagus (HGMUE) with Pharyngolaryngeal Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Knowledge and Education Among Healthcare Professional Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1