Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor adherence and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ESC Heart Failure Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15117
Dong-Hyuk Cho, Jimi Choi, Jong-Chan Youn, Mi-Na Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Jung-Woo Son, Byung-Su Yoo
{"title":"Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor adherence and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.","authors":"Dong-Hyuk Cho, Jimi Choi, Jong-Chan Youn, Mi-Na Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Jung-Woo Son, Byung-Su Yoo","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Whether medication adherence to angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in real-world practice is associated with the reduced risk of all-cause mortality or hospitalization relative to that with traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of medication adherence of ARNI and traditional RAS blockade in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a nationwide longitudinal cohort study with patients with HFrEF using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017-2021) covering the entire population. A total of 13 483 patients with HFrEF who received ARNI were matched 1:1 with 13 483 patients who received traditional RAS blockade using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or any hospitalization within one year. Medication adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) relative to total medication prescribed. ARNI and traditional RAS blockade adherence rates were directly compared to analyse their respective associations with the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the ARNI group had a lower rate of the primary outcome than those in the traditional RAS blockade group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.81; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC values spanning 1 year were 92.6 ± 14.5% and 90.9 ± 17.7% in the ARNI and RAS blockade groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Among patients with PDC ≥ 80%, the risk of primary outcome was significantly lower in the ARNI group than in the RAS blockade group (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.78; P < 0.001) while a risk reduction with ARNI was not observed among patients with PDC < 80% (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.05; P = 0.313). The beneficial effect was more pronounced among patients with PDC ≥ 80% than that among patients with PDC < 80% (P for interaction <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world cohort with HFrEF, ARNI was superior to traditional RAS blockade in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. The benefit of ARNI was pronounced among patients with high medication adherence but not among those with low medication adherence, highlighting the importance of adherence to ARNI treatment for HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PARADE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05329727.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"603-612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11769608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Whether medication adherence to angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in real-world practice is associated with the reduced risk of all-cause mortality or hospitalization relative to that with traditional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of medication adherence of ARNI and traditional RAS blockade in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Method: We conducted a nationwide longitudinal cohort study with patients with HFrEF using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017-2021) covering the entire population. A total of 13 483 patients with HFrEF who received ARNI were matched 1:1 with 13 483 patients who received traditional RAS blockade using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or any hospitalization within one year. Medication adherence was assessed by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) relative to total medication prescribed. ARNI and traditional RAS blockade adherence rates were directly compared to analyse their respective associations with the primary outcome.

Results: Patients in the ARNI group had a lower rate of the primary outcome than those in the traditional RAS blockade group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.81; P < 0.001]. Mean PDC values spanning 1 year were 92.6 ± 14.5% and 90.9 ± 17.7% in the ARNI and RAS blockade groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Among patients with PDC ≥ 80%, the risk of primary outcome was significantly lower in the ARNI group than in the RAS blockade group (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.72-0.78; P < 0.001) while a risk reduction with ARNI was not observed among patients with PDC < 80% (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.05; P = 0.313). The beneficial effect was more pronounced among patients with PDC ≥ 80% than that among patients with PDC < 80% (P for interaction <0.001).

Conclusions: In a real-world cohort with HFrEF, ARNI was superior to traditional RAS blockade in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. The benefit of ARNI was pronounced among patients with high medication adherence but not among those with low medication adherence, highlighting the importance of adherence to ARNI treatment for HFrEF.

Trial registration: PARADE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05329727.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数减低型心力衰竭患者服用血管紧张素受体-肾上腺素抑制剂的依从性和预后。
目的:与传统的肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻断疗法相比,在现实世界中坚持使用血管紧张素受体-肾素抑制剂(ARNI)是否与降低全因死亡或住院风险有关,目前仍不清楚。本研究调查了射血分数减低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者ARNI和传统RAS阻断药物治疗依从性的影响:我们利用韩国国民健康保险服务数据(2017-2021 年)对 HFrEF 患者进行了一项覆盖全国人口的纵向队列研究。采用倾向得分匹配法,将接受 ARNI 治疗的 13 483 例 HFrEF 患者与接受传统 RAS 阻断治疗的 13 483 例患者进行 1:1 匹配。主要结果是一年内全因死亡率或任何住院治疗的复合结果。用药依从性通过计算相对于处方总用药的覆盖天数比例(PDC)进行评估。直接比较了ARNI和传统RAS阻断治疗的依从率,以分析它们各自与主要结果的关系:结果:ARNI组患者的主要结局发生率低于传统RAS阻断组[危险比(HR)0.78;95%置信区间(CI)0.75-0.81;P 结论:ARNI组患者的主要结局发生率低于传统RAS阻断组:在真实世界的 HFrEF 队列中,ARNI 在降低全因死亡和住院风险方面优于传统的 RAS 阻断疗法。在用药依从性高的患者中,ARNI的疗效显著,而在用药依从性低的患者中,ARNI的疗效并不明显,这凸显了坚持ARNI治疗对HFrEF的重要性:试验注册:PARADE-HF ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT05329727。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
期刊最新文献
2024 update in heart failure. Intravenous iron therapy for heart failure and iron deficiency: An updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Combined mechanical circulatory support (Impella + ECMO) in cardiogenic shock caused by fulminant myocarditis. Assessing congestion using estimated plasma volume status: Ready for prime time? External validation of the natriuretic response prediction equation to discriminate diuretic response in heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1