Skeletal muscle fuel utilisation during exercise: A historical account of the Scandinavian involvement in the ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Experimental Physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1113/EP092156
Ronan M. G. Berg
{"title":"Skeletal muscle fuel utilisation during exercise: A historical account of the Scandinavian involvement in the ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’","authors":"Ronan M. G. Berg","doi":"10.1113/EP092156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As I have previously recounted, the collective research efforts of Erik Hohwü Christensen (1904–1996), Marius Nielsen (1903–2000) and Erling Asmussen (1907–1991), known as The Three Musketeers of Scandinavian exercise physiology, significantly advanced the understanding of the adaptive resetting of homeostasis across organ systems during exercise (Berg, <span>2024</span>). Their collaborative studies, conducted mainly between 1936 and 1941, primarily focused on cardiovascular, respiratory and thermoregulatory functions. At first glance, one might wonder why they did not also focus on skeletal muscle metabolism within this framework; indeed, is the very <i>raison d'être</i> of these homeostatic adaptations not to ensure adequate substrate delivery to the contracting skeletal muscle? However, it turns out that this was indeed a primary research focus for Christensen and his colleague Ove Hansen (1907–1990) as early as 1931–1932. Here, I describe how their studies added to the decades-long so-called ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’, but how unforeseen events seemingly stalled this line of research for years, until revived by Christensen's students at the Royal Gymnastic Central Institute (GCI) in Stockholm.</p><p>The ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’ centred on whether carbohydrates serve as the exclusive substrate for skeletal muscle metabolism or not, particularly during exercise (Asmussen, <span>1971</span>). The French veterinarian and Professor of Comparative Pathology Jean-Baptiste Auguste Chauveau (1827–1917) is credited as the first to propose that glucose is the sole metabolic substrate for muscle contraction, as his experiments showed that the levator muscle of the lower lip in horses increases glucose uptake during chewing (Chauveau &amp; Kaufman, <span>1887</span>). This supported his subsequent demonstration that the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) in humans increases from 0.70 at rest to 0.97 after hours of stair-walking (Chauveau, <span>1896</span>). From the late 1880s, the contemporary Berlin-based physiologist Nathan Zuntz (1847–1920) also measured a rise in RER in exercising horses and humans. However, when Zuntz later reviewed his almost 30 years of work (Zuntz, <span>1911</span>), he reasoned that since RER never reaches unity during exercise, both carbohydrates and fats must be oxidised by contracting skeletal muscle. Zuntz furthermore argued that the relative contribution of each substrate depends on the intensity and duration of the exercise.</p><p>Things (literally) started heating up when the rising star of the time, Archibald V. Hill (1886–1977), disputed Zuntz's theory. Hill had shown that heat production in contracting isolated frog muscle remained constant regardless of oxygen availability, but that additional heat was generated when oxygen was present during the recovery phase (Hill, <span>1910, 1913</span>). Hill attributed this phenomenon to the formation of lactate, which he believed to be the primary substrate for muscle contraction. He proposed that during recovery, oxygen was utilised to convert lactate back into its parent carbohydrate molecule (Hill, <span>1913</span>), later identified as glycogen. In parallel, Francis G. Benedict (1870–1957) and Edward P. Cathcart (1877–1954) studied a professional cyclist; using a mouthpiece and closed-circuit system for intermittent collection of expired air during exercise, they found that RER increased during exercise, regardless of whether this was preceded by a high carbohydrate or high-fat diet (Benedict &amp; Cathcart, <span>1913</span>). However, RER did not reach unity, and they thus concluded that there was compelling evidence to support increased carbohydrate utilisation during exercise, but stressed that their findings did not necessarily imply exclusive reliance on carbohydrate metabolism for skeletal muscle contraction (Benedict &amp; Cathcart, <span>1913</span>).</p><p>August Krogh (1874–1949) and Johannes Lindhard (1870–1947) at the University of Copenhagen, closely followed the ongoing debate regarding skeletal muscle fuel utilisation whilst conducting their studies on acute exercise in humans. Back in 1908, August Krogh and his wife, Marie Krogh (1874–1974), had obtained RER measurements in Innuits on an expedition to Greenland (Krogh &amp; Krogh, <span>1913</span>). Since then, August Krogh has optimised his RER measurements by constructing an elaborate respiration chamber to achieve unprecedented precision for the measurement of respiratory gas fractions with an average difference between double determinations of 0.001 percentage points or less (!) (Krogh, <span>1920</span>). As August Krogh and Lindhard were very critical of the measurements obtained by the intermittent air collection technique employed by Benedict and Cathcart, they devised their own extensive experimental set-up, in which they subjected six individuals—including themselves—to a controlled three-day high carbohydrate or high-fat diet. The high-carbohydrate diet consisted of bread, cakes, apples, potatoes and green peas, whilst the high-fat diet included bacon, cream, butter, eggs and cabbage. The latter proved particularly cumbersome, often causing gastrointestinal discomfort and disrupted sleep (Krogh &amp; Lindhard, <span>1920</span>). Following the dietary regimens, the participants underwent steady-state measurements of RER during exercise at a light-to-moderate intensity. August Krogh and Lindhard published a 74-page paper in 1920 with more than 200 RER determinations, showing a consistent increase in RER during exercise, especially pronounced after the high-carbohydrate diet, but RER always remained below unity (Krogh &amp; Lindhard, <span>1920</span>). They therefore affirmed that whilst carbohydrates are the primary substrate for muscular work, fat utilisation is also a source of energy, depending on diet, exercise intensity and exercise duration.</p><p>In the early 1930s, a comprehensive research programme into the physiology of strenuous exercise was undertaken at August Krogh's Zoophysiological Laboratory and Lindhard's Laboratory for Gymnastics Theory at the Rockefeller Institute, partly funded by the League of Nations Health Organisation (Christensen et al., <span>1934</span>). Based on one of Christensen's earlier investigations, showing hypoglycaemia as a cause of exhaustion during prolonged strenuous exercise (Christensen, <span>1931</span>), and inspired by August Krogh and Lindhard's study from a decade prior, Christensen and Hansen pushed the boundaries further by incorporating even more strenuous and extended exercise sessions lasting up to 4 h. This was much to the frustration of the resident professors at the Rockefeller Institute, as these sessions were often initiated between 6 and 7 a.m. (Asmussen, <span>1987</span>). As in his previous studies, and probably inspired by the work of Arlie Bock (1888–1984) and co-workers from the Harvard Fatigue Laboratory who had also measured RER during exercise (Bock et al., <span>1928</span>), Christensen's work focused on measurements obtained at steady state, and in contrast to August Krogh and Lindhard's earlier studies, the measurements were obtained on highly fit individuals, which typically included himself, Hansen and other colleagues.</p><p>In their experiments, Christensen and Hansen implemented much more extensive dietary interventions than August Krogh and Lindhard, spanning week-long periods of either high-carbohydrate or high-fat diets. The dietary regimen of three daily high-fat meals, typically comprising fatty pork, whipped cream and mayonnaise, proved to be particularly arduous. Even with the assistance of a colleague's wife, a household assistant who did her best to make the meals palatable, it was challenging to adhere to the diet. To cope with the dietary challenges, Christensen and Hansen often had to flush down these meals with a snaps or two (Asmussen, <span>1987</span>).</p><p>Christensen and Hansen found that RER served as a valid indicator of the relative proportions of fat and carbohydrate utilisation during exercise, particularly at submaximal levels, but not at maximal exertion (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939a</span>). Notably, RER was only reliable once a steady state had been established, typically requiring 10–15 min of exercise at a given intensity (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939a</span>). They observed that RER increased with exercise intensity and that this increase was especially pronounced after a high-carbohydrate diet (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939b, 1939c</span>). Furthermore, well-trained individuals exhibited lower RER values at the same external workload compared to untrained individuals (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939d</span>). During prolonged exercise, they noted a decrease in RER (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939b, 1939c</span>), indicating a metabolic shift towards increased fat utilisation, and they also found that endurance could be enhanced by oral glucose ingestion during exercise (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939e</span>). They interpreted their findings to suggest that whilst carbohydrates played a predominant role in muscle energy turnover, fat was an alternative substrate which could serve to spare the body's glycogen stores, thereby influencing endurance. However, the mechanisms governing this regulation remained to be determined, and there was still no direct evidence of glycogen depletion in skeletal muscle as a mechanism of exhaustion since skeletal muscle glycogen could not be measured directly.</p><p>As Christensen and Hansen were completing their experiments in August Krogh's Zoophysiological Laboratory in 1932, Hansen's health took a dramatic turn for the worse (Asmussen, <span>1987</span>). He began experiencing personality changes, progressive depressive symptoms and compulsions. Eventually, his condition deteriorated to the point where he required extended sick leave. Hansen had spent hours after each experiment in the basement under the Zoophysiological Laboratory where the gas analyser was located. The handling of mercury at the laboratory was notoriously reckless at this time, and it was often spilled and left in pools on tables and both on and underneath the wooden floorboards (Schmidt-Nielsen, <span>1995</span>). Later, many of Hansen's colleagues speculated that his symptoms were caused by the prolonged exposure to mercury vapours. Indeed, both Christensen and Nielsen later suffered from acute mercury poisoning with pulmonary oedema during an overnight experiment in the laboratory's hypobaric chamber. Had it not been for their concerned wives who insisted on staying by to check up on them, this could have caused an untimely end to the tales of The Three Musketeers (Asmussen, <span>1987</span>)! Whilst the overnight experiments were never completed, Christensen and Nielsen managed to maximise the scientific gain from their somewhat dramatic experience, as they subsequently published it as a case study on mercury poisoning in <i>Nature</i> with the assistance of Marie Krogh (Christensen et al., <span>1937</span>).</p><p>It took five years before Christensen and Hansen got to write up their findings on skeletal muscle fuel utilisation, such that they could finally be published in five back-to-back papers (Christensen &amp; Hansen, <span>1939a, 1939b</span>, <span>1939c, 1939d</span>, <span>1939e</span>). However, they never had the opportunity to follow up on their research, as Christensen had become deeply involved in studying respiratory, cardiovascular and thermoregulatory functions with his fellow Musketeers in the meantime (Berg, <span>2024</span>). Soon after, they parted ways as Christensen accepted the chair of Physiology of Bodily Exercises and Hygiene at the newly established Department of Physiology at GCI in 1941.</p><p>Moving to GCI was a dramatic change for Christensen. He was not met with any immediate welcoming warmth from the management (Åstrand, <span>1991</span>), and soldiers from the Swedish Air Force were stationed on the premises where he was supposed to establish a laboratory (Schantz, <span>2009, 2015</span>). This led to an immediate desire to return to Copenhagen, but after the German occupation of Denmark, he ultimately decided to stay in Stockholm (Åstrand, <span>1991</span>). It took a few years before he could finally move into a new laboratory with two former students as assistants, two refugees from Estonia and a clerk (Åstrand, <span>1991</span>). The opportunity to perform advanced research was very limited at first, but he gradually created an attractive and internationally renowned research environment, within which he helped break the tradition of theoretically based so-called Ling gymnastics founded at GCI to instead promote exercise science as an experimental discipline (Schantz, <span>2009</span>). In line with his formative years as one of The Three Musketeers, he proved himself to be a true swordsman of physiology like so many others before him (Bailey et al., <span>2023</span>). Despite Christensen's interest in skeletal muscle fuel utilisation in his youth, the research at his laboratory focused on almost every other aspect of exercise physiology for many years (Åstrand, <span>1991</span>). However, things took a change when Bengt Saltin (1935–2014), a medical student at the Karolinska Institute, joined Christensen's team at GCI nearly two decades after Christensen had accepted the chair.</p><p>Saltin's early efforts focused on studying the mechanisms of exhaustion in both untrained and trained individuals, with the latter group mainly comprising champion cross-country skiers, primarily investigating aerobic capacity and thermoregulation (Saltin, <span>1964</span>). In his studies, he also measured RER during exercise, and like Christensen and Hansen, he observed that RER increased during several hours of prolonged submaximal strenuous exercise, and then decreased near exhaustion (Saltin, <span>1964</span>; Saltin &amp; Stenberg, <span>1964</span>). Whilst this suggested glycogen depletion as a mechanism of exhaustion, it remained speculative, such that all Saltin could do in his doctoral thesis from 1964 was to exclaim, ‛it is impossible to make an exact determination of the glycogen combustion’ (!) (Saltin, <span>1964</span>). However, this was soon to change, as it turned out that two physicians, Jonas Bergström (1929–2001) and Erik Hultman (1925–2011), working just around the corner at St Erik's Hospital in Stockholm, had developed a muscle biopsy needle technique that could be used for quantitative glycogen measurements in humans.</p><p>Initially, Bergström and Hultman investigated skeletal muscle glycogen stores in patients with diabetes mellitus and after surgical stress (Bergström et al., <span>1963, 1965</span>). However, their research soon caught the attention of Saltin and his colleagues at GCI, as they started studying glycogen depletion in working skeletal muscle. Not only did they publish a paper in <i>Nature</i> on the involvement of a local humoral factor in glycogen synthesis after exhaustive exercise (Bergström &amp; Hultman, <span>1966a</span>), reminiscent of the ‘work factor’ previously proposed by the Three Musketeers (Berg, <span>2024</span>), but they also specifically reported on the glycogen depletion rate in the vastus lateralis muscles of healthy young men during moderate-intensity cycle ergometer exercise (Bergström &amp; Hultman, <span>1966b</span>). As they concurrently measured negligible glucose exchange across the leg, they could conclude that glycogen was indeed the main energy source during this type of exercise (Bergström &amp; Hultman, <span>1966b</span>). Building on Christensen and Hansen's findings from two decades prior, they also used their muscle biopsy-based technique to show that glycogen was specifically depleted in contracting muscle and that glucose infusion lessened the glycogen depletion rate (Bergström &amp; Hultman, <span>1967</span>). Clearly, Saltin was eager to implement their muscle biopsy methodology at GCI, and he soon joined forces with them to follow up on Christensen and Hansen's previous studies.</p><p>In their first collaborative study, Bergström, Hultman and Saltin recruited nine healthy volunteers to investigate the depletion of glycogen stores through strenuous exercise to exhaustion (Bergström et al., <span>1967</span>). Participants underwent a 3-day dietary intervention involving either a high-carbohydrate or a combined high-fat high-protein diet. Subsequently, muscle biopsies were taken to assess glycogen levels, and the participants then engaged in exercise at a relative workload of 75% of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{max}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> until exhaustion. As expected, the high-carbohydrate diet led to the highest muscle glycogen levels, and the time to exhaustion correlated closely with the decrease in muscle glycogen content. In another study, participants also worked to complete exhaustion on a cycle ergometer at around 75% of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{max}}}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, but this time comparing 10 well-trained to 10 untrained individuals (Hermansen et al., <span>1967</span>). Glycogen content was determined at several sampling times from the onset of exercise to exhaustion. Carbohydrate combustion corresponded closely to the glycogen depletion rate, which was similar in trained and untrained individuals, and at exhaustion the glycogen content was close to zero in both groups. In a study of long-distance runners, this glycogen depletion was later found to be fibre-type specific (Costill et al., <span>1973</span>). Saltin reasoned that exhaustion likely ensues because free fatty acids and glucose from blood are insufficient energy sources for ATP production when glycogen is depleted, thus rendering the specific fibres unable to accommodate the demand for tension development at the given workload (Saltin, <span>1975</span>). So, finally, and in line with Christensen and Hansen's previous findings, it could be concluded that glycogen is the main – but not the only – skeletal muscle fuel during strenuous exercise, and its depletion is a critical mechanism of exhaustion. Furthermore, it seemed that greater aerobic fitness enhanced the metabolic capacity for fat utilisation during exercise, such that skeletal muscle glycogen was preserved to enhance endurance.</p><p>Curiously, whilst much of the work was going on at GCI in the 1960s, Christensen had decided to embark on a sabbatical, working for the International Labour Organization as an advisor in industrial physiology for the Indian government (Asmussen, <span>1987</span>). Afterwards, he spent a few years in Copenhagen before he returned to GCI until his retirement. Shortly before his retirement, a symposium entitled ‘Muscle Metabolism During Exercise’ was held at the Karolinska Institute in 1970 with him as the honorary guest. Asmussen gave the introductory talk on the history of research within skeletal muscle energetics, and credited Christensen with resolving the ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’ (Asmussen, <span>1971</span>). As also highlighted in a discursive monograph in Danish with the translated title <i>The Special Theory of Bodily Exercises</i>, which Asmussen and Christensen wrote together during those years (Asmussen &amp; Christensen, <span>1973</span>), the line of studies going back to August Krogh, Lindhard, The Three Musketeers and their companions all the way up to the studies of Bergström, Hultman and Saltin were critically reviewed. Together, these studies made it clear that skeletal muscle fuel utilisation, akin to respiratory, cardiovascular and thermoregulatory functions, is a tightly regulated process that is reset according to exercise intensity to preserve energy homeostasis. Although this concept was conceived more than a century ago, the factors that mediate and regulate skeletal muscle fuel utilisation remain a major area within exercise physiology and endocrinology to this day (Hargreaves &amp; Spriet, <span>2020</span>; Smith et al., <span>2023</span>), studied by generations of Musketeerian swordsmen and swordswomen of physiology, both inside and outside Scandinavia.</p><p>Ronan M. G. Berg conceived and wrote the article and wrote the first draft and is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The Centre for Physical Activity Research (CFAS) is supported by TrygFonden (grants ID 101390 and ID 20045). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"110 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11689119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP092156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As I have previously recounted, the collective research efforts of Erik Hohwü Christensen (1904–1996), Marius Nielsen (1903–2000) and Erling Asmussen (1907–1991), known as The Three Musketeers of Scandinavian exercise physiology, significantly advanced the understanding of the adaptive resetting of homeostasis across organ systems during exercise (Berg, 2024). Their collaborative studies, conducted mainly between 1936 and 1941, primarily focused on cardiovascular, respiratory and thermoregulatory functions. At first glance, one might wonder why they did not also focus on skeletal muscle metabolism within this framework; indeed, is the very raison d'être of these homeostatic adaptations not to ensure adequate substrate delivery to the contracting skeletal muscle? However, it turns out that this was indeed a primary research focus for Christensen and his colleague Ove Hansen (1907–1990) as early as 1931–1932. Here, I describe how their studies added to the decades-long so-called ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’, but how unforeseen events seemingly stalled this line of research for years, until revived by Christensen's students at the Royal Gymnastic Central Institute (GCI) in Stockholm.

The ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’ centred on whether carbohydrates serve as the exclusive substrate for skeletal muscle metabolism or not, particularly during exercise (Asmussen, 1971). The French veterinarian and Professor of Comparative Pathology Jean-Baptiste Auguste Chauveau (1827–1917) is credited as the first to propose that glucose is the sole metabolic substrate for muscle contraction, as his experiments showed that the levator muscle of the lower lip in horses increases glucose uptake during chewing (Chauveau & Kaufman, 1887). This supported his subsequent demonstration that the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) in humans increases from 0.70 at rest to 0.97 after hours of stair-walking (Chauveau, 1896). From the late 1880s, the contemporary Berlin-based physiologist Nathan Zuntz (1847–1920) also measured a rise in RER in exercising horses and humans. However, when Zuntz later reviewed his almost 30 years of work (Zuntz, 1911), he reasoned that since RER never reaches unity during exercise, both carbohydrates and fats must be oxidised by contracting skeletal muscle. Zuntz furthermore argued that the relative contribution of each substrate depends on the intensity and duration of the exercise.

Things (literally) started heating up when the rising star of the time, Archibald V. Hill (1886–1977), disputed Zuntz's theory. Hill had shown that heat production in contracting isolated frog muscle remained constant regardless of oxygen availability, but that additional heat was generated when oxygen was present during the recovery phase (Hill, 1910, 1913). Hill attributed this phenomenon to the formation of lactate, which he believed to be the primary substrate for muscle contraction. He proposed that during recovery, oxygen was utilised to convert lactate back into its parent carbohydrate molecule (Hill, 1913), later identified as glycogen. In parallel, Francis G. Benedict (1870–1957) and Edward P. Cathcart (1877–1954) studied a professional cyclist; using a mouthpiece and closed-circuit system for intermittent collection of expired air during exercise, they found that RER increased during exercise, regardless of whether this was preceded by a high carbohydrate or high-fat diet (Benedict & Cathcart, 1913). However, RER did not reach unity, and they thus concluded that there was compelling evidence to support increased carbohydrate utilisation during exercise, but stressed that their findings did not necessarily imply exclusive reliance on carbohydrate metabolism for skeletal muscle contraction (Benedict & Cathcart, 1913).

August Krogh (1874–1949) and Johannes Lindhard (1870–1947) at the University of Copenhagen, closely followed the ongoing debate regarding skeletal muscle fuel utilisation whilst conducting their studies on acute exercise in humans. Back in 1908, August Krogh and his wife, Marie Krogh (1874–1974), had obtained RER measurements in Innuits on an expedition to Greenland (Krogh & Krogh, 1913). Since then, August Krogh has optimised his RER measurements by constructing an elaborate respiration chamber to achieve unprecedented precision for the measurement of respiratory gas fractions with an average difference between double determinations of 0.001 percentage points or less (!) (Krogh, 1920). As August Krogh and Lindhard were very critical of the measurements obtained by the intermittent air collection technique employed by Benedict and Cathcart, they devised their own extensive experimental set-up, in which they subjected six individuals—including themselves—to a controlled three-day high carbohydrate or high-fat diet. The high-carbohydrate diet consisted of bread, cakes, apples, potatoes and green peas, whilst the high-fat diet included bacon, cream, butter, eggs and cabbage. The latter proved particularly cumbersome, often causing gastrointestinal discomfort and disrupted sleep (Krogh & Lindhard, 1920). Following the dietary regimens, the participants underwent steady-state measurements of RER during exercise at a light-to-moderate intensity. August Krogh and Lindhard published a 74-page paper in 1920 with more than 200 RER determinations, showing a consistent increase in RER during exercise, especially pronounced after the high-carbohydrate diet, but RER always remained below unity (Krogh & Lindhard, 1920). They therefore affirmed that whilst carbohydrates are the primary substrate for muscular work, fat utilisation is also a source of energy, depending on diet, exercise intensity and exercise duration.

In the early 1930s, a comprehensive research programme into the physiology of strenuous exercise was undertaken at August Krogh's Zoophysiological Laboratory and Lindhard's Laboratory for Gymnastics Theory at the Rockefeller Institute, partly funded by the League of Nations Health Organisation (Christensen et al., 1934). Based on one of Christensen's earlier investigations, showing hypoglycaemia as a cause of exhaustion during prolonged strenuous exercise (Christensen, 1931), and inspired by August Krogh and Lindhard's study from a decade prior, Christensen and Hansen pushed the boundaries further by incorporating even more strenuous and extended exercise sessions lasting up to 4 h. This was much to the frustration of the resident professors at the Rockefeller Institute, as these sessions were often initiated between 6 and 7 a.m. (Asmussen, 1987). As in his previous studies, and probably inspired by the work of Arlie Bock (1888–1984) and co-workers from the Harvard Fatigue Laboratory who had also measured RER during exercise (Bock et al., 1928), Christensen's work focused on measurements obtained at steady state, and in contrast to August Krogh and Lindhard's earlier studies, the measurements were obtained on highly fit individuals, which typically included himself, Hansen and other colleagues.

In their experiments, Christensen and Hansen implemented much more extensive dietary interventions than August Krogh and Lindhard, spanning week-long periods of either high-carbohydrate or high-fat diets. The dietary regimen of three daily high-fat meals, typically comprising fatty pork, whipped cream and mayonnaise, proved to be particularly arduous. Even with the assistance of a colleague's wife, a household assistant who did her best to make the meals palatable, it was challenging to adhere to the diet. To cope with the dietary challenges, Christensen and Hansen often had to flush down these meals with a snaps or two (Asmussen, 1987).

Christensen and Hansen found that RER served as a valid indicator of the relative proportions of fat and carbohydrate utilisation during exercise, particularly at submaximal levels, but not at maximal exertion (Christensen & Hansen, 1939a). Notably, RER was only reliable once a steady state had been established, typically requiring 10–15 min of exercise at a given intensity (Christensen & Hansen, 1939a). They observed that RER increased with exercise intensity and that this increase was especially pronounced after a high-carbohydrate diet (Christensen & Hansen, 1939b, 1939c). Furthermore, well-trained individuals exhibited lower RER values at the same external workload compared to untrained individuals (Christensen & Hansen, 1939d). During prolonged exercise, they noted a decrease in RER (Christensen & Hansen, 1939b, 1939c), indicating a metabolic shift towards increased fat utilisation, and they also found that endurance could be enhanced by oral glucose ingestion during exercise (Christensen & Hansen, 1939e). They interpreted their findings to suggest that whilst carbohydrates played a predominant role in muscle energy turnover, fat was an alternative substrate which could serve to spare the body's glycogen stores, thereby influencing endurance. However, the mechanisms governing this regulation remained to be determined, and there was still no direct evidence of glycogen depletion in skeletal muscle as a mechanism of exhaustion since skeletal muscle glycogen could not be measured directly.

As Christensen and Hansen were completing their experiments in August Krogh's Zoophysiological Laboratory in 1932, Hansen's health took a dramatic turn for the worse (Asmussen, 1987). He began experiencing personality changes, progressive depressive symptoms and compulsions. Eventually, his condition deteriorated to the point where he required extended sick leave. Hansen had spent hours after each experiment in the basement under the Zoophysiological Laboratory where the gas analyser was located. The handling of mercury at the laboratory was notoriously reckless at this time, and it was often spilled and left in pools on tables and both on and underneath the wooden floorboards (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1995). Later, many of Hansen's colleagues speculated that his symptoms were caused by the prolonged exposure to mercury vapours. Indeed, both Christensen and Nielsen later suffered from acute mercury poisoning with pulmonary oedema during an overnight experiment in the laboratory's hypobaric chamber. Had it not been for their concerned wives who insisted on staying by to check up on them, this could have caused an untimely end to the tales of The Three Musketeers (Asmussen, 1987)! Whilst the overnight experiments were never completed, Christensen and Nielsen managed to maximise the scientific gain from their somewhat dramatic experience, as they subsequently published it as a case study on mercury poisoning in Nature with the assistance of Marie Krogh (Christensen et al., 1937).

It took five years before Christensen and Hansen got to write up their findings on skeletal muscle fuel utilisation, such that they could finally be published in five back-to-back papers (Christensen & Hansen, 1939a, 1939b, 1939c, 1939d, 1939e). However, they never had the opportunity to follow up on their research, as Christensen had become deeply involved in studying respiratory, cardiovascular and thermoregulatory functions with his fellow Musketeers in the meantime (Berg, 2024). Soon after, they parted ways as Christensen accepted the chair of Physiology of Bodily Exercises and Hygiene at the newly established Department of Physiology at GCI in 1941.

Moving to GCI was a dramatic change for Christensen. He was not met with any immediate welcoming warmth from the management (Åstrand, 1991), and soldiers from the Swedish Air Force were stationed on the premises where he was supposed to establish a laboratory (Schantz, 2009, 2015). This led to an immediate desire to return to Copenhagen, but after the German occupation of Denmark, he ultimately decided to stay in Stockholm (Åstrand, 1991). It took a few years before he could finally move into a new laboratory with two former students as assistants, two refugees from Estonia and a clerk (Åstrand, 1991). The opportunity to perform advanced research was very limited at first, but he gradually created an attractive and internationally renowned research environment, within which he helped break the tradition of theoretically based so-called Ling gymnastics founded at GCI to instead promote exercise science as an experimental discipline (Schantz, 2009). In line with his formative years as one of The Three Musketeers, he proved himself to be a true swordsman of physiology like so many others before him (Bailey et al., 2023). Despite Christensen's interest in skeletal muscle fuel utilisation in his youth, the research at his laboratory focused on almost every other aspect of exercise physiology for many years (Åstrand, 1991). However, things took a change when Bengt Saltin (1935–2014), a medical student at the Karolinska Institute, joined Christensen's team at GCI nearly two decades after Christensen had accepted the chair.

Saltin's early efforts focused on studying the mechanisms of exhaustion in both untrained and trained individuals, with the latter group mainly comprising champion cross-country skiers, primarily investigating aerobic capacity and thermoregulation (Saltin, 1964). In his studies, he also measured RER during exercise, and like Christensen and Hansen, he observed that RER increased during several hours of prolonged submaximal strenuous exercise, and then decreased near exhaustion (Saltin, 1964; Saltin & Stenberg, 1964). Whilst this suggested glycogen depletion as a mechanism of exhaustion, it remained speculative, such that all Saltin could do in his doctoral thesis from 1964 was to exclaim, ‛it is impossible to make an exact determination of the glycogen combustion’ (!) (Saltin, 1964). However, this was soon to change, as it turned out that two physicians, Jonas Bergström (1929–2001) and Erik Hultman (1925–2011), working just around the corner at St Erik's Hospital in Stockholm, had developed a muscle biopsy needle technique that could be used for quantitative glycogen measurements in humans.

Initially, Bergström and Hultman investigated skeletal muscle glycogen stores in patients with diabetes mellitus and after surgical stress (Bergström et al., 1963, 1965). However, their research soon caught the attention of Saltin and his colleagues at GCI, as they started studying glycogen depletion in working skeletal muscle. Not only did they publish a paper in Nature on the involvement of a local humoral factor in glycogen synthesis after exhaustive exercise (Bergström & Hultman, 1966a), reminiscent of the ‘work factor’ previously proposed by the Three Musketeers (Berg, 2024), but they also specifically reported on the glycogen depletion rate in the vastus lateralis muscles of healthy young men during moderate-intensity cycle ergometer exercise (Bergström & Hultman, 1966b). As they concurrently measured negligible glucose exchange across the leg, they could conclude that glycogen was indeed the main energy source during this type of exercise (Bergström & Hultman, 1966b). Building on Christensen and Hansen's findings from two decades prior, they also used their muscle biopsy-based technique to show that glycogen was specifically depleted in contracting muscle and that glucose infusion lessened the glycogen depletion rate (Bergström & Hultman, 1967). Clearly, Saltin was eager to implement their muscle biopsy methodology at GCI, and he soon joined forces with them to follow up on Christensen and Hansen's previous studies.

In their first collaborative study, Bergström, Hultman and Saltin recruited nine healthy volunteers to investigate the depletion of glycogen stores through strenuous exercise to exhaustion (Bergström et al., 1967). Participants underwent a 3-day dietary intervention involving either a high-carbohydrate or a combined high-fat high-protein diet. Subsequently, muscle biopsies were taken to assess glycogen levels, and the participants then engaged in exercise at a relative workload of 75% of V ̇ O 2 max ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{max}}}}$ until exhaustion. As expected, the high-carbohydrate diet led to the highest muscle glycogen levels, and the time to exhaustion correlated closely with the decrease in muscle glycogen content. In another study, participants also worked to complete exhaustion on a cycle ergometer at around 75% of V ̇ O 2 max ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{max}}}}$ , but this time comparing 10 well-trained to 10 untrained individuals (Hermansen et al., 1967). Glycogen content was determined at several sampling times from the onset of exercise to exhaustion. Carbohydrate combustion corresponded closely to the glycogen depletion rate, which was similar in trained and untrained individuals, and at exhaustion the glycogen content was close to zero in both groups. In a study of long-distance runners, this glycogen depletion was later found to be fibre-type specific (Costill et al., 1973). Saltin reasoned that exhaustion likely ensues because free fatty acids and glucose from blood are insufficient energy sources for ATP production when glycogen is depleted, thus rendering the specific fibres unable to accommodate the demand for tension development at the given workload (Saltin, 1975). So, finally, and in line with Christensen and Hansen's previous findings, it could be concluded that glycogen is the main – but not the only – skeletal muscle fuel during strenuous exercise, and its depletion is a critical mechanism of exhaustion. Furthermore, it seemed that greater aerobic fitness enhanced the metabolic capacity for fat utilisation during exercise, such that skeletal muscle glycogen was preserved to enhance endurance.

Curiously, whilst much of the work was going on at GCI in the 1960s, Christensen had decided to embark on a sabbatical, working for the International Labour Organization as an advisor in industrial physiology for the Indian government (Asmussen, 1987). Afterwards, he spent a few years in Copenhagen before he returned to GCI until his retirement. Shortly before his retirement, a symposium entitled ‘Muscle Metabolism During Exercise’ was held at the Karolinska Institute in 1970 with him as the honorary guest. Asmussen gave the introductory talk on the history of research within skeletal muscle energetics, and credited Christensen with resolving the ‘Zuntz–Chauveau controversy’ (Asmussen, 1971). As also highlighted in a discursive monograph in Danish with the translated title The Special Theory of Bodily Exercises, which Asmussen and Christensen wrote together during those years (Asmussen & Christensen, 1973), the line of studies going back to August Krogh, Lindhard, The Three Musketeers and their companions all the way up to the studies of Bergström, Hultman and Saltin were critically reviewed. Together, these studies made it clear that skeletal muscle fuel utilisation, akin to respiratory, cardiovascular and thermoregulatory functions, is a tightly regulated process that is reset according to exercise intensity to preserve energy homeostasis. Although this concept was conceived more than a century ago, the factors that mediate and regulate skeletal muscle fuel utilisation remain a major area within exercise physiology and endocrinology to this day (Hargreaves & Spriet, 2020; Smith et al., 2023), studied by generations of Musketeerian swordsmen and swordswomen of physiology, both inside and outside Scandinavia.

Ronan M. G. Berg conceived and wrote the article and wrote the first draft and is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

The Centre for Physical Activity Research (CFAS) is supported by TrygFonden (grants ID 101390 and ID 20045). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动时骨骼肌的燃料利用:斯堪的纳维亚人参与 "Zuntz-Chauveau 之争 "的历史回顾。
正如我之前所述,Erik Hohwü Christensen (1904-1996), Marius Nielsen(1903-2000)和Erling Asmussen(1907-1991)的集体研究努力,被称为斯堪的纳维亚运动生理学的三个火枪手,显著地推进了对运动过程中跨器官系统动态平衡的适应性重置的理解(Berg, 2024)。他们的合作研究主要在1936年至1941年间进行,主要关注心血管、呼吸和体温调节功能。乍一看,人们可能会奇怪为什么他们不在这个框架内也关注骨骼肌代谢;的确,这些自我平衡适应的原因是不能保证向收缩的骨骼肌提供足够的底物吗?然而,事实证明,这确实是克里斯滕森和他的同事Ove Hansen(1907-1990)早在1931-1932年的主要研究重点。在这里,我描述了他们的研究如何加剧了长达数十年的所谓“Zuntz-Chauveau争议”,但不可预见的事件似乎使这条研究线停滞了数年,直到克里斯滕森的学生在斯德哥尔摩皇家体操中央学院(GCI)重新开始。“Zuntz-Chauveau争议”集中在碳水化合物是否作为骨骼肌代谢的唯一底物,特别是在运动期间(Asmussen, 1971)。法国兽医兼比较病理学教授让-巴蒂斯特·奥古斯特·肖沃(1827-1917)被认为是第一个提出葡萄糖是肌肉收缩的唯一代谢底物的人,因为他的实验表明,马下唇的提上肌在咀嚼时增加了葡萄糖的摄取(肖沃&;考夫曼,1887)。这支持了他随后的论证,即人的呼吸交换比(RER)从休息时的0.70增加到走几个小时楼梯后的0.97 (Chauveau, 1896)。从19世纪80年代末开始,同时代的柏林生理学家内森·尊茨(Nathan Zuntz, 1847-1920)也测量了锻炼马和人的RER的上升。然而,当Zuntz后来回顾他近30年的工作(Zuntz, 1911)时,他推断,由于RER在运动中从未达到统一,碳水化合物和脂肪都必须通过收缩骨骼肌来氧化。Zuntz进一步认为,每种基质的相对贡献取决于运动的强度和持续时间。当当时冉冉升起的新星阿奇博尔德·v·希尔(1886-1977)对尊茨的理论提出质疑时,事情(字面上)开始升温。Hill已经证明,无论是否有氧气供应,青蛙肌肉收缩时产生的热量都是恒定的,但在恢复阶段,当氧气存在时,会产生额外的热量(Hill, 1910, 1913)。希尔将这种现象归因于乳酸的形成,他认为乳酸是肌肉收缩的主要底物。他提出,在恢复过程中,氧气被用来将乳酸盐转化回其母体碳水化合物分子(Hill, 1913),后来被确定为糖原。同时,Francis G. Benedict(1870-1957)和Edward P. Cathcart(1877-1954)研究了一名职业自行车手;他们发现,在运动过程中,无论在高碳水化合物或高脂肪饮食之前,RER都在运动过程中增加(Benedict &amp;卡斯卡特,1913)。然而,RER并没有达成一致,因此他们得出结论,有令人信服的证据支持在运动中增加碳水化合物的利用,但强调他们的发现并不一定意味着骨骼肌肉收缩完全依赖碳水化合物代谢(Benedict &amp;卡斯卡特,1913)。哥本哈根大学的August Krogh(1874-1949)和Johannes Lindhard(1870-1947)在进行人类急性运动研究时,密切关注了关于骨骼肌燃料利用的持续争论。早在1908年,奥古斯特·克拉夫(August Krogh)和他的妻子玛丽·克拉夫(Marie Krogh, 1874-1974)在格陵兰岛的一次探险中,就用因纽特语获得了RER的测量结果。克罗,1913)。从那时起,August Krogh通过构建一个复杂的呼吸室来优化他的RER测量,以达到前所未有的呼吸气体分数测量精度,两次测定之间的平均差异为0.001个百分点或更少(!)(Krogh, 1920)。由于奥古斯特·克罗夫和林德哈德对本尼迪克特和卡斯卡特采用的间歇性空气收集技术所获得的测量结果非常不满,他们设计了自己的广泛实验装置,在实验中,他们让六个人(包括他们自己)接受三天的高碳水化合物或高脂肪饮食控制。高碳水化合物饮食包括面包、蛋糕、苹果、土豆和青豆,而高脂肪饮食包括培根、奶油、黄油、鸡蛋和卷心菜。 后者被证明特别麻烦,经常引起胃肠道不适和睡眠中断(克拉夫&;Lindhard, 1920)。根据饮食方案,参与者在轻到中等强度的运动期间进行了RER的稳态测量。August Krogh和Lindhard在1920年发表了一篇74页的论文,对200多个RER进行了测定,结果显示,在运动期间,RER持续增加,特别是在高碳水化合物饮食后,但RER始终保持在统一以下(Krogh &;Lindhard, 1920)。因此,他们肯定,虽然碳水化合物是肌肉工作的主要基础,但脂肪的利用也是能量的来源,这取决于饮食、运动强度和运动时间。在20世纪30年代早期,奥古斯特·克拉夫的动物生理学实验室和林德哈德在洛克菲勒研究所的体操理论实验室开展了一项关于剧烈运动生理学的综合研究项目,部分资金由国际卫生组织联盟提供(Christensen et al., 1934)。克里斯滕森早期的一项调查显示,低血糖是长时间剧烈运动中疲劳的原因(克里斯滕森,1931),并受到奥古斯特·克罗夫和林德哈德十年前的研究的启发,克里斯滕森和汉森进一步突破了界限,将更剧烈和延长的运动时间延长至4小时。这让洛克菲勒研究所的住院教授们非常沮丧。因为这些会议通常在上午6点至7点之间开始(Asmussen, 1987)。和他之前的研究一样,可能是受到了Arlie Bock(1888-1984)和哈佛疲劳实验室同事(Bock et al., 1928)的启发,Christensen的工作重点是在稳定状态下获得的测量结果,与August Krogh和Lindhard的早期研究相反,这些测量结果是在高度健康的个体上获得的,通常包括他自己、Hansen和其他同事。在他们的实验中,克里斯滕森和汉森实施了比奥古斯特·克罗夫和林德哈德更广泛的饮食干预,他们持续了一周的高碳水化合物或高脂肪饮食。事实证明,每天三餐的高脂肪饮食(通常包括肥肉、鲜奶油和蛋黄酱)尤其艰难。即使有一位同事的妻子帮忙,她是一位家庭助理,她尽了最大的努力使饭菜美味,但要坚持这种饮食还是很有挑战性的。为了应对饮食上的挑战,克里斯滕森和汉森经常不得不拍一两张照片就把这些食物冲下去(Asmussen, 1987)。克里斯滕森和汉森发现,RER是运动中脂肪和碳水化合物利用的相对比例的有效指标,尤其是在亚极限水平时,而不是在极限运动时。汉森,1939)。值得注意的是,RER只有在稳定状态建立后才可靠,通常需要在给定强度下进行10-15分钟的运动(Christensen &amp;汉森,1939)。他们观察到内质RER随着运动强度的增加而增加,这种增加在高碳水化合物饮食后尤其明显(Christensen &amp;Hansen, 1999b, 1999c)。此外,与未经训练的个体相比,受过良好训练的个体在相同的外部工作量下表现出更低的RER值(Christensen &amp;汉森,1939 d)。在长时间的运动中,他们注意到内质网的减少(Christensen &amp;Hansen, 19939b, 19939c),表明代谢转变为增加脂肪利用,他们还发现运动期间口服葡萄糖摄入可以提高耐力(Christensen &amp;汉森,1939 e)。他们对研究结果的解释是,虽然碳水化合物在肌肉能量转换中起着主要作用,但脂肪是另一种基质,可以节省身体的糖原储存,从而影响耐力。然而,控制这种调节的机制仍有待确定,并且由于骨骼肌糖原不能直接测量,因此仍然没有骨骼肌糖原消耗作为衰竭机制的直接证据。1932年,当克里斯滕森和汉森在奥古斯特·克拉夫的动物生理学实验室完成他们的实验时,汉森的健康状况急剧恶化(Asmussen, 1987)。他开始经历性格改变、进行性抑郁症状和强迫症。最后,他的病情恶化到需要请长时间病假的地步。每次实验结束后,汉森都要在动物生理学实验室的地下室里待上几个小时,那里有气体分析仪。当时,实验室对汞的处理是出了名的鲁莽,汞经常被洒出并留在桌子上的水池里,以及木板上和地板下(Schmidt-Nielsen, 1995)。 后来,汉森的许多同事推测,他的症状是由于长期接触汞蒸气引起的。事实上,克里斯滕森和尼尔森后来在实验室的低压室里进行了一夜的实验,结果都患上了急性汞中毒和肺水肿。如果不是他们关心他们的妻子坚持留下来检查他们,这可能会导致三个火枪手的故事过早结束。虽然夜间实验从未完成,但克里斯滕森和尼尔森设法从他们多少有些戏剧性的经历中获得最大的科学收益,因为他们随后在Marie Krogh的帮助下将其作为汞中毒的案例研究发表在《自然》杂志上(Christensen et al., 1937)。克里斯滕森和汉森花了5年时间才把他们关于骨骼肌燃料利用的发现写出来,这样他们就可以连续发表5篇论文了。汉森,1939a, 1939b, 1939c, 1939d, 1939e)。然而,他们从未有机会跟进他们的研究,因为克里斯滕森在此期间与他的火枪手同事一起深入研究呼吸、心血管和体温调节功能(Berg, 2024)。不久之后,他们分道扬镳,1941年,克里斯滕森接受了GCI新成立的生理学系体育运动与卫生生理学的主席职位。对克里斯滕森来说,加入GCI是一个巨大的变化。他没有立即受到管理层的热情欢迎(Åstrand, 1991),瑞典空军的士兵驻扎在他应该建立实验室的场所(Schantz, 2009, 2015)。这导致他立即想回到哥本哈根,但在德国占领丹麦后,他最终决定留在斯德哥尔摩(Åstrand, 1991)。花了几年时间,他终于搬进了一个新的实验室,两个以前的学生做助手,两个来自爱沙尼亚的难民和一个职员(Åstrand, 1991)。一开始进行高级研究的机会非常有限,但他逐渐创造了一个有吸引力的、国际知名的研究环境,在这个环境中,他打破了GCI创立的所谓Ling体操的理论基础传统,转而推动运动科学作为一门实验学科(Schantz, 2009)。与他作为三个火枪手之一的成长期一致,他证明了自己是一个真正的生理学剑客,就像他之前的许多人一样(Bailey et al., 2023)。尽管Christensen在年轻时就对骨骼肌燃料利用感兴趣,但他的实验室的研究多年来几乎专注于运动生理学的所有其他方面(Åstrand, 1991)。然而,事情发生了变化,在克里斯滕森接受该职位近20年后,卡罗林斯卡医学院的医学生本特·萨尔廷(1935-2014)加入了克里斯滕森在GCI的团队。Saltin早期致力于研究未训练和训练个体的疲劳机制,后者主要由越野滑雪冠军组成,主要研究有氧能力和体温调节(Saltin, 1964)。在他的研究中,他也测量了运动时的内质网,和Christensen和Hansen一样,他观察到内质网在长时间的亚极限剧烈运动中增加,然后在接近疲惫时下降(Saltin, 1964;Saltin,斯坦伯格,1964)。虽然这表明糖原消耗是一种耗尽机制,但它仍然是推测性的,因此Saltin在1964年的博士论文中所能做的就是感叹,“不可能精确地确定糖原燃烧”(!)(Saltin, 1964)。然而,这种情况很快就改变了,因为在斯德哥尔摩圣埃里克医院附近工作的两位医生Jonas Bergström(1929-2001)和Erik Hultman(1925-2011)开发了一种肌肉活检针技术,可用于人体糖原的定量测量。最初,Bergström和Hultman研究了糖尿病患者和手术应激后骨骼肌糖原储存(Bergström etal ., 1963,1965)。然而,他们的研究很快引起了Saltin和他在GCI的同事们的注意,因为他们开始研究工作骨骼肌的糖原消耗。他们不仅在《自然》杂志上发表了一篇论文,论述了一种局部体液因子在剧烈运动后参与糖原合成(Bergström &amp;Hultman, 1966a),这让人想起了三个火枪手之前提出的“工作因子”(Berg, 2024),但他们也特别报道了健康年轻男性在中等强度的循环力量计运动中股外侧肌的糖原消耗率(Bergström &amp;Hultman 1966 b)。 当他们同时测量腿部的葡萄糖交换时,他们可以得出结论,糖原确实是这种运动中的主要能量来源(Bergström &amp;Hultman 1966 b)。在克里斯滕森和汉森20年前的发现的基础上,他们还利用肌肉活检技术表明,糖原在收缩肌肉中被特异性地消耗掉,葡萄糖输注降低了糖原消耗率(Bergström &amp;Hultman 1967)。显然,Saltin渴望在GCI实施他们的肌肉活检方法,他很快就加入了他们的队伍,跟进克里斯滕森和汉森之前的研究。在他们的第一项合作研究Bergström中,Hultman和Saltin招募了9名健康志愿者,调查剧烈运动到疲劳时糖原储存的消耗情况(Bergström et al., 1967)。参与者接受了为期3天的饮食干预,包括高碳水化合物或高脂肪高蛋白组合饮食。随后,进行肌肉活检以评估糖原水平,然后,参与者以75%的相对工作量进行运动,以达到最大运动量${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{max}}}}$,直到精疲力竭。正如预期的那样,高碳水化合物饮食导致最高的肌糖原水平,并且疲劳时间与肌糖原含量的减少密切相关。在另一项研究中,参与者还在自行车计力器上以大约75%的V²max ${\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}} _2}{\mathrm{max}}}}$,但这次比较了10个训练有素的人和10个未经训练的人(Hermansen et al., 1967)。糖原含量测定在几个采样时间从开始运动到疲惫。碳水化合物燃烧与糖原消耗率密切相关,训练和未训练个体的糖原消耗率相似,两组的糖原含量在耗尽时接近于零。在一项长跑运动员的研究中,后来发现这种糖原消耗是纤维类型特异性的(Costill et al., 1973)。Saltin认为,当糖原耗尽时,血液中的游离脂肪酸和葡萄糖不足以产生ATP,从而导致特定纤维无法适应给定工作量下张力发展的需求,因此可能会出现疲劳(Saltin, 1975)。因此,最后,与克里斯滕森和汉森之前的发现一致,我们可以得出结论,糖原是剧烈运动中骨骼肌主要的——但不是唯一的——燃料,它的消耗是疲劳的关键机制。此外,更强的有氧适应性似乎增强了运动中脂肪利用的代谢能力,因此骨骼肌糖原被保存下来以增强耐力。奇怪的是,20世纪60年代,当GCI的大部分工作都在进行时,克里斯滕森决定休假,在国际劳工组织担任印度政府工业生理学顾问(Asmussen, 1987)。之后,他在哥本哈根呆了几年,然后回到GCI直到退休。在他退休前不久,1970年在卡罗林斯卡学院举行了一场题为“运动中的肌肉代谢”的研讨会,他是荣誉嘉宾。Asmussen做了关于骨骼肌能量学研究历史的介绍,并称赞Christensen解决了“Zuntz-Chauveau争议”(Asmussen, 1971)。阿斯穆森和克里斯滕森在那几年共同撰写的丹麦语论著《身体锻炼的特殊理论》(Asmussen &amp;Christensen, 1973),回溯到August Krogh, Lindhard, the Three Musketeers和他们的同伴,一直到Bergström, Hultman和Saltin的研究,这些研究都受到了严格的审查。总之,这些研究清楚地表明,骨骼肌的燃料利用,类似于呼吸、心血管和体温调节功能,是一个严格调节的过程,根据运动强度进行重置,以保持能量稳态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
On the statistical interpretation of ultrasound-based models predicting skeletal muscle fat infiltration. Myths and methodologies: Optimising experimental rigour in heat adaptation research: Menstrual status classification and scheduling approaches. Bed rest decreases resting skeletal muscle O2 uptake and resting energy expenditure in young and elderly subjects. Effects of reducing sedentary behaviour on heart rate variability and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in desk workers with untreated high blood pressure. Noradrenergic regulation of skeletal muscle oxygen pressures: Impact of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heat therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1