Muataz Kashbour, Abdulhameed Alhadeethi, Sara Awwad, Mazen Yassin, Ahmed Amin, Mohamed Abed, Abubaker Abdelmalik, Yasmeen Jamal Alabdallat
{"title":"The efficacy of Veliparib in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Muataz Kashbour, Abdulhameed Alhadeethi, Sara Awwad, Mazen Yassin, Ahmed Amin, Mohamed Abed, Abubaker Abdelmalik, Yasmeen Jamal Alabdallat","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2417770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of veliparib, a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy in treating bronchogenic carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials comparing veliparib plus chemotherapy to standard chemotherapy in adult lung cancer patients, until July 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included six studies encompassing 2,136 patients. Veliparib has a slight OS improvement over placebo, HR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.83 to 1.0], <i>p</i> = 0.05. Veliparib offers more OS benefit in the subpopulation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.03 and HR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.79, 1.28], <i>p</i> = 0.97, respectively. There was no significant PFS benefit between the two groups, HR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.81-1.01], <i>p</i> = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Veliparib has a marginal inclination for overall survival improvement, more so in NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile. Our results merit the pursuit of better-powered trials to support further the extent of veliparib's effectiveness in lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42023453705).</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2417770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of veliparib, a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy in treating bronchogenic carcinoma.
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials comparing veliparib plus chemotherapy to standard chemotherapy in adult lung cancer patients, until July 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: This meta-analysis included six studies encompassing 2,136 patients. Veliparib has a slight OS improvement over placebo, HR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.83 to 1.0], p = 0.05. Veliparib offers more OS benefit in the subpopulation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81,0.99], p = 0.03 and HR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.79, 1.28], p = 0.97, respectively. There was no significant PFS benefit between the two groups, HR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.81-1.01], p = 0.08).
Conclusion: Veliparib has a marginal inclination for overall survival improvement, more so in NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile. Our results merit the pursuit of better-powered trials to support further the extent of veliparib's effectiveness in lung cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.