En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Oncological, Histopathological, and Surgical Outcomes.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.004
Giuseppe Basile, Alessandro Uleri, Riccardo Leni, Donato Cannoletta, Luca Afferi, Michael Baboudjian, Pietro Diana, David D'Andrea, Jeremy Teoh, Benjamin Pradere, José D Subiela, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Thomas Seisen, Morgan Rouprêt, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Marco Moschini, Alberto Breda, Andrea Gallioli
{"title":"En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Oncological, Histopathological, and Surgical Outcomes.","authors":"Giuseppe Basile, Alessandro Uleri, Riccardo Leni, Donato Cannoletta, Luca Afferi, Michael Baboudjian, Pietro Diana, David D'Andrea, Jeremy Teoh, Benjamin Pradere, José D Subiela, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Thomas Seisen, Morgan Rouprêt, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Marco Moschini, Alberto Breda, Andrea Gallioli","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been introduced to enhance the quality of resection of bladder cancer. This review aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials published until May 2024. The primary outcomes were the risk of recurrence and progression. The secondary outcomes were detrusor muscle (DM) presence, muscularis mucosae (MM) detectability, bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex rates, operative time, length of catheterization and hospitalization, and residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was observed in 12-mo recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.02; p = 0.08), 24-mo recurrence (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.22; p = 0.8), and 12-mo progression (RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.05-10.14; p = 0.8) rates. ERBT was significantly associated with a higher DM presence (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; p = 0.02), while no statistically significant difference emerged in the residual tumor at reTURBT and MM detectability (all p > 0.05). ERBT was significantly associated with a lower risk of bladder perforation (p = 0.002) and obturator nerve reflex (p < 0.001). Finally, ERBT was significantly associated with longer operative time, lower catheterization time, and lower length of hospital stay. The main limitation was heterogeneity among the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>ERBT is safer due to fewer intraoperative events, but there was no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared with cTURBT. Higher DM detection with ERBT enhances initial disease stratification, potentially improving clinical decision-making and care delivery.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>En bloc resection of bladder tumors is associated with lower intraoperative complications than and superior histopathological information to the conventional resection technique. However, the absence of a difference in oncological outcomes underscores the influence of factors such as tumor characteristics, surgeon expertise, and postoperative care on subsequent events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.10.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been introduced to enhance the quality of resection of bladder cancer. This review aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

Methods: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials published until May 2024. The primary outcomes were the risk of recurrence and progression. The secondary outcomes were detrusor muscle (DM) presence, muscularis mucosae (MM) detectability, bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex rates, operative time, length of catheterization and hospitalization, and residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT).

Key findings and limitations: Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was observed in 12-mo recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.02; p = 0.08), 24-mo recurrence (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.22; p = 0.8), and 12-mo progression (RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.05-10.14; p = 0.8) rates. ERBT was significantly associated with a higher DM presence (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; p = 0.02), while no statistically significant difference emerged in the residual tumor at reTURBT and MM detectability (all p > 0.05). ERBT was significantly associated with a lower risk of bladder perforation (p = 0.002) and obturator nerve reflex (p < 0.001). Finally, ERBT was significantly associated with longer operative time, lower catheterization time, and lower length of hospital stay. The main limitation was heterogeneity among the included studies.

Conclusions and clinical implications: ERBT is safer due to fewer intraoperative events, but there was no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared with cTURBT. Higher DM detection with ERBT enhances initial disease stratification, potentially improving clinical decision-making and care delivery.

Patient summary: En bloc resection of bladder tumors is associated with lower intraoperative complications than and superior histopathological information to the conventional resection technique. However, the absence of a difference in oncological outcomes underscores the influence of factors such as tumor characteristics, surgeon expertise, and postoperative care on subsequent events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱肿瘤整体切除术与传统经尿道切除术的比较:肿瘤学、组织病理学和手术结果的系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。
背景和目的:膀胱肿瘤全切术(ERBT)被引入以提高膀胱癌切除的质量。本综述旨在比较ERBT和传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(cTURBT)的围手术期和肿瘤学结果:方法:使用 PubMed/Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库进行文献检索,以确定 2024 年 5 月之前发表的随机对照试验。主要结果是复发和进展风险。次要结果包括:是否存在逼尿肌(DM)、粘膜肌(MM)的可探测性、膀胱穿孔率和闭孔神经反射率、手术时间、导尿时间和住院时间,以及重复经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(reTURBT)的残余肿瘤:17项研究符合我们的纳入标准。在12个月复发率(风险比[RR] 0.81,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.65-1.02;P = 0.08)、24个月复发率(RR 1.02,95% CI:0.85-1.22;P = 0.8)和12个月进展率(RR 0.68,95% CI:0.05-10.14;P = 0.8)方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。ERBT与较高的DM存在率明显相关(RR 1.10,95% CI:1.01-1.20;p = 0.02),而在再TURBT时的残留肿瘤和MM可探测性方面没有出现统计学意义上的明显差异(均 p > 0.05)。ERBT与较低的膀胱穿孔风险(p = 0.002)和闭孔神经反射风险(p 结论和临床意义:ERBT术中事件较少,因此更安全,但与cTURBT相比,ERBT的肿瘤预后无明显差异。ERBT的DM检出率较高,可加强最初的疾病分层,从而改善临床决策和护理服务。患者总结:膀胱肿瘤的全切术与传统切除技术相比,术中并发症较低,组织病理学信息也更丰富。然而,肿瘤学结果并无差异,这凸显了肿瘤特征、外科医生专业知识和术后护理等因素对后续事件的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Repeat Prostate Cancer Screening using Blood-based Risk Prediction or Prostate-specific Antigen in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies : A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer. Combined Fixed-duration Systemic Treatment and Metastasis-directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1