Neonatal encephalopathy multiorgan scoring systems: systematic review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1427516
Noor Adeebah Mohamed Razif, Aidan D'Arcy, Sarah Waicus, Alyssa Agostinis, Rachelle Scheepers, Yvonne Buttle, Aidan Pepper, Aisling Hughes, Basem Fouda, Panya Matreja, Emily MacInnis, Mary O'Dea, Eman Isweisi, Philip Stewart, Aoife Branagan, Edna F Roche, Judith Meehan, Eleanor J Molloy
{"title":"Neonatal encephalopathy multiorgan scoring systems: systematic review.","authors":"Noor Adeebah Mohamed Razif, Aidan D'Arcy, Sarah Waicus, Alyssa Agostinis, Rachelle Scheepers, Yvonne Buttle, Aidan Pepper, Aisling Hughes, Basem Fouda, Panya Matreja, Emily MacInnis, Mary O'Dea, Eman Isweisi, Philip Stewart, Aoife Branagan, Edna F Roche, Judith Meehan, Eleanor J Molloy","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1427516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a condition with multifactorial etiology that causes multiorgan injury to neonates. The severity of multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) in NE varies, with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) as the standard of care. The aim is to identify current approaches used to assess and determine an optimum scoring system for MOD in NE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies of scoring systems for MOD in NE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 628 articles of which 12 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. Five studies found a positive correlation between the severity of NE and MOD. There was significant heterogeneity across the scoring systems, including the eligibility criteria for participants, the methods assessing specific organ systems, the length of follow-up, and adverse outcomes. The neurological, hepatic, cardiovascular, respiratory, hematological, and renal systems were included in most studies while the gastrointestinal system was only in three studies. The definitions for hepatic, renal, and respiratory systems dysfunction were most consistent while the cardiovascular system varied the most.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A NE multiorgan scoring system should ideally include the renal, hepatic, respiratory, neurological, hematological, and cardiovascular systems. Despite the heterogeneity between the studies, these provide potential candidates for the standardization of MOD scoring systems in NE. Validation is needed for the parameters with adequate length of follow-up beyond the neonatal period. Additionally, the evaluation of MOD may be affected by TH considering its multiorgan effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1427516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a condition with multifactorial etiology that causes multiorgan injury to neonates. The severity of multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) in NE varies, with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) as the standard of care. The aim is to identify current approaches used to assess and determine an optimum scoring system for MOD in NE.

Methods: The systematic review conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies of scoring systems for MOD in NE.

Results: The search yielded 628 articles of which 12 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. Five studies found a positive correlation between the severity of NE and MOD. There was significant heterogeneity across the scoring systems, including the eligibility criteria for participants, the methods assessing specific organ systems, the length of follow-up, and adverse outcomes. The neurological, hepatic, cardiovascular, respiratory, hematological, and renal systems were included in most studies while the gastrointestinal system was only in three studies. The definitions for hepatic, renal, and respiratory systems dysfunction were most consistent while the cardiovascular system varied the most.

Discussion: A NE multiorgan scoring system should ideally include the renal, hepatic, respiratory, neurological, hematological, and cardiovascular systems. Despite the heterogeneity between the studies, these provide potential candidates for the standardization of MOD scoring systems in NE. Validation is needed for the parameters with adequate length of follow-up beyond the neonatal period. Additionally, the evaluation of MOD may be affected by TH considering its multiorgan effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿脑病多器官评分系统:系统综述。
导言:新生儿脑病(NE)是一种具有多因素病因的疾病,会对新生儿造成多器官损伤。新生儿多器官功能障碍(MOD)的严重程度各不相同,治疗性低温(TH)是护理的标准。本文旨在确定目前用于评估 NE 多器官功能障碍的方法,并确定最佳评分系统:该系统性综述符合系统性综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们使用 PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Scopus 和 CINAHL 对 NE 中 MOD 评分系统的研究进行了电子检索:搜索结果:共搜索到 628 篇文章,其中 12 项研究被纳入数据提取和分析。五项研究发现 NE 的严重程度与 MOD 呈正相关。各评分系统之间存在明显的异质性,包括参与者的资格标准、评估特定器官系统的方法、随访时间和不良结果。大多数研究纳入了神经系统、肝脏、心血管、呼吸系统、血液系统和肾脏系统,而只有三项研究纳入了胃肠道系统。肝、肾和呼吸系统功能障碍的定义最为一致,而心血管系统的定义差异最大:讨论:东北多器官评分系统最好包括肾、肝、呼吸、神经、血液和心血管系统。尽管各研究之间存在异质性,但这些研究为标准化 NE 的 MOD 评分系统提供了潜在的候选方案。需要对新生儿期以后的参数进行充分的随访验证。此外,考虑到TH对多器官的影响,MOD的评估可能会受到TH的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Antiphospholipid syndrome onset with hemolytic anemia and accompanied cardiocerebral events: a case report. Analysis of early and treatment related deaths among children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia in Poland: 2005-2023. Case Report: Functional characterization of a missense variant in INSR associated with hypoketotic hypoglycemia. Clinical prognostic models in children with sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Decreased TREC and KREC levels in newborns with trisomy 21.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1