Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s40121-024-01065-3
Weiwen Gao, Jian Yang, Xiangwang Zhang, Lei Tian, Dong Xu, Shuyun Xu, Dong Liu, Yan He
{"title":"Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.","authors":"Weiwen Gao, Jian Yang, Xiangwang Zhang, Lei Tian, Dong Xu, Shuyun Xu, Dong Liu, Yan He","doi":"10.1007/s40121-024-01065-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy and safety of omadacycline have been primarily documented through Phase III clinical trials; however, there are limited data from real-world clinical settings. This study aims to explore the real-world use of omadacycline in China and identify the factors associated with its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients treated with omadacycline at a single center from March 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed demographic characteristics, laboratory results, antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors associated with clinical treatment failure or failure of microbial clearance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 patients were included in the final analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 71.0% (130/183) of patients, with a bacterial clearance rate of 61.9% (26/42). Renal impairment was observed in 20.8% (38/183) of patients, with 39.5% (15/38) of these patients receiving nephrotoxic antibiotic treatments. Noteworthy adverse drug reactions were rare during the course of the treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent factors associated with treatment failure: moderate to severe liver damage (OR: 3.073, 95% CI 1.345-7.021, p = 0.008), admission to the respiratory department (OR: 2.573, 95% CI 1.135-5.834, p = 0.024), and a duration of omadacycline therapy of less than 7 days (OR: 3.762, 95% CI 1.626-8.706, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that omadacycline treatment can achieve favorable clinical success and bacterial clearance, with positive safety and tolerability outcomes. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these initial findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-01065-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of omadacycline have been primarily documented through Phase III clinical trials; however, there are limited data from real-world clinical settings. This study aims to explore the real-world use of omadacycline in China and identify the factors associated with its efficacy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients treated with omadacycline at a single center from March 2022 to March 2024. We analyzed demographic characteristics, laboratory results, antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors associated with clinical treatment failure or failure of microbial clearance.

Results: A total of 183 patients were included in the final analysis. Clinical success was achieved in 71.0% (130/183) of patients, with a bacterial clearance rate of 61.9% (26/42). Renal impairment was observed in 20.8% (38/183) of patients, with 39.5% (15/38) of these patients receiving nephrotoxic antibiotic treatments. Noteworthy adverse drug reactions were rare during the course of the treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent factors associated with treatment failure: moderate to severe liver damage (OR: 3.073, 95% CI 1.345-7.021, p = 0.008), admission to the respiratory department (OR: 2.573, 95% CI 1.135-5.834, p = 0.024), and a duration of omadacycline therapy of less than 7 days (OR: 3.762, 95% CI 1.626-8.706, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that omadacycline treatment can achieve favorable clinical success and bacterial clearance, with positive safety and tolerability outcomes. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these initial findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥马他环素在中国治疗多种感染:疗效与安全性的真实世界分析》。
简介:奥美拉唑嗪的疗效和安全性主要通过III期临床试验得到证实,但来自实际临床环境的数据却十分有限。本研究旨在探讨奥美拉唑在中国的实际使用情况,并确定其疗效的相关因素:方法:我们对 2022 年 3 月至 2024 年 3 月期间在一个中心接受奥美拉唑治疗的患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。我们分析了人口统计学特征、实验室结果、抗生素治疗方案和临床结果。我们采用逻辑回归法来确定与临床治疗失败或微生物清除失败相关的风险因素:共有 183 名患者被纳入最终分析。71.0%的患者(130/183)取得了临床成功,细菌清除率为61.9%(26/42)。20.8%(38/183)的患者出现肾功能损害,其中39.5%(15/38)的患者接受了肾毒性抗生素治疗。在治疗过程中,很少出现值得注意的药物不良反应。多变量逻辑回归分析确定了几个与治疗失败相关的独立因素:中度至重度肝损伤(OR:3.073,95% CI 1.345-7.021,p = 0.008)、入住呼吸科(OR:2.573,95% CI 1.135-5.834,p = 0.024)和奥马德西林治疗时间少于 7 天(OR:3.762,95% CI 1.626-8.706,p = 0.002):我们的研究表明,奥美拉唑霉素治疗可取得良好的临床疗效和细菌清除率,并具有积极的安全性和耐受性。然而,要验证这些初步研究结果,还需要进行高质量的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
期刊最新文献
Heartfelt Impact: A Descriptive Analysis of Ceftaroline-Containing Regimens in Endocarditis due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Correction to: Understanding the Sequelae of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the United States. Acute Cerebellitis Following COVID-19: Alarming Clinical Presentation Challenged by Normal Paraclinical Findings. Letter to the Editor: "Real-World Effectiveness of Ensitrelvir in Reducing Severe Outcomes in Outpatients at High Risk for COVID-19". Combination Versus Monotherapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Species Serious Infections: A Prospective IPTW Adjusted Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1