Integrating Clinical Variables, Radiomics, and Tumor-derived Cell-Free DNA for Enhanced Prediction of Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Outcomes.

Tom van den Ende, Steven C Kuijper, Yousif Widaatalla, Wyanne A Noortman, Floris H P van Velden, Henry C Woodruff, Ymke van der Pol, Norbert Moldovan, D Michiel Pegtel, Sarah Derks, Maarten F Bijlsma, Florent Mouliere, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, Philippe Lambin, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
{"title":"Integrating Clinical Variables, Radiomics, and Tumor-derived Cell-Free DNA for Enhanced Prediction of Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Outcomes.","authors":"Tom van den Ende, Steven C Kuijper, Yousif Widaatalla, Wyanne A Noortman, Floris H P van Velden, Henry C Woodruff, Ymke van der Pol, Norbert Moldovan, D Michiel Pegtel, Sarah Derks, Maarten F Bijlsma, Florent Mouliere, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, Philippe Lambin, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The value of integrating clinical variables, radiomics, and tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for the prediction of survival and response to chemoradiation of patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma is not yet known. Our aim was to investigate if radiomics and cfDNA metrics combined with clinical variables can improve personalized predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A cohort of 111 patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2 centers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was used for exploratory retrospective analyses. Models combining the clinical variables of the SOURCE survival model with radiomic features and cfDNA were built using elastic net regression and internally validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance for overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were evaluated with the C-index and the area under the curve for pathologic complete response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing baseline models for OS and TTP were based on the combination of SOURCE-cfDNA that reached a C-index of 0.55 and 0.59 compared with 0.44 to 0.45 with SOURCE alone. The addition of restaging positron emission tomography radiomics to SOURCE was the most promising addition for predicting OS (C-index: 0.65) and TTP (C-index: 0.60). Baseline risk stratification was achieved for OS and TTP by combining SOURCE with radiomics or cfDNA, log-rank P < .01. The best-performing combination model for the prediction of pathologic complete response reached an area under the curve of 0.61 compared with 0.47 with SOURCE variables alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of radiomics and cfDNA can improve the performance of an established survival model. External validity needs to be further assessed in future studies together with the optimization of radiomic pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The value of integrating clinical variables, radiomics, and tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for the prediction of survival and response to chemoradiation of patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma is not yet known. Our aim was to investigate if radiomics and cfDNA metrics combined with clinical variables can improve personalized predictions.

Methods and materials: A cohort of 111 patients with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma from 2 centers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was used for exploratory retrospective analyses. Models combining the clinical variables of the SOURCE survival model with radiomic features and cfDNA were built using elastic net regression and internally validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance for overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were evaluated with the C-index and the area under the curve for pathologic complete response.

Results: The best-performing baseline models for OS and TTP were based on the combination of SOURCE-cfDNA that reached a C-index of 0.55 and 0.59 compared with 0.44 to 0.45 with SOURCE alone. The addition of restaging positron emission tomography radiomics to SOURCE was the most promising addition for predicting OS (C-index: 0.65) and TTP (C-index: 0.60). Baseline risk stratification was achieved for OS and TTP by combining SOURCE with radiomics or cfDNA, log-rank P < .01. The best-performing combination model for the prediction of pathologic complete response reached an area under the curve of 0.61 compared with 0.47 with SOURCE variables alone.

Conclusions: The addition of radiomics and cfDNA can improve the performance of an established survival model. External validity needs to be further assessed in future studies together with the optimization of radiomic pipelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合临床变量、放射组学和肿瘤衍生的无细胞 DNA,增强对可切除食管腺癌预后的预测。
研究背景整合临床变量、放射组学和肿瘤衍生的无细胞DNA(cfDNA)对于预测可切除食管腺癌(rEAC)患者的生存期和化疗反应的价值尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究放射组学和cfDNA指标与临床变量相结合能否改善个性化预测:方法:我们对来自两个中心、接受新辅助放化疗的 111 例 rEAC 患者进行了探索性回顾分析。采用弹性网回归法建立了将SOURCE生存模型的临床变量与放射学特征和cfDNA相结合的模型,并通过5倍交叉验证进行了内部验证。用C指数和病理完全反应曲线下面积(AUC)评估了总生存期(OS)和进展时间(TTP)的模型性能 结果:OS和TTP性能最好的基线模型是基于SOURCE-cfDNA的组合,其C指数分别为0.55和0.59,而单独使用SOURCE的C指数为0.44-0.45。在SOURCE基础上增加重新分期PET放射组学是预测OS(C-index:0.65)和TTP(C-index:0.60)的最有前途的方法。将 SOURCE 与放射组学或 cfDNA 结合使用,可对 OS 和 TTP 进行基线风险分层,对数秩 p 结论:加入放射组学和 cfDNA 可以提高已建立的生存模型的性能。需要在未来的研究中进一步评估外部有效性,同时优化放射组学管道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk. The association of linear energy transfer and dose with radiation necrosis after pencil beam scanning proton therapy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: Association of dose and LET with radiation necrosis. Data-Driven Volumetric CT Image Generation from Surface Structures using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model. Phase II trial of consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer after staging surgery: a phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1