Comparative effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries: a network meta-analysis.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM International Journal of Obesity Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1038/s41366-024-01648-7
Adnan Malik, Muhammad Imran Malik, Sadia Javaid, Shahbaz Qureshi, Abdul Nadir
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Adnan Malik, Muhammad Imran Malik, Sadia Javaid, Shahbaz Qureshi, Abdul Nadir","doi":"10.1038/s41366-024-01648-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bariatric surgery is recommended for patients with unhealthy weight. Our study aim to compare and rank different bariatric surgical approaches in reducing weight parameters. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023. We extracted all outcomes as mean change from the baseline. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used as a summary measure. All analysis was conducted with R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31) and R Studio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022) (RStudio, Inc.). Included surgeries were: Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD-RYGB), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Gastric Plication (LGP), Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS), Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB), Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Gastric plication, Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), and Intra-gastric balloon (IGB). Only clinical trials were included, with outcomes focused on weight parameters such as reductions in BMI (kg/m²), weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), fat mass (kg), and excess weight loss (EWL) (%). Our analysis of 67 studies showed that SADI-S was the best surgical technique in decreasing BMI (kg/m2) (MD = -18.06; 95% CI [-25.31; -10.81]) and DS follows in efficacy with a P-score (MD = -18.88; 95% CI [-31.15; -6.62]) however the pooled analysis was heterogeneous (I<sup>2</sup> = 98.5%). For weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), and fat mass (kg), BPD-RYGB was the best surgical technique to reduce these parameters (MD = -41.48; 95% CI [-47.80, -35.51], MD = -29.08; 95% CI [-37.16, -21.00], and MD = -31.11; 95% CI [-38.77, -23.46]; respectively). The pooled analysis was heterogeneous except in fat mass (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p-value = 0.8). Our network meta-analysis showed that the best surgical technique in increasing EWL (%) was RY-DS (MD = -61.27; % CI [-91.72; -30.82]) the next one in efficacy according to P-score was LVBG (MD = -59.03; % CI [-84.47; -33.59]). SADI-S is most effective in reducing BMI followed by RYGB. DS was associated with most estimated weight loss %.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01648-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is recommended for patients with unhealthy weight. Our study aim to compare and rank different bariatric surgical approaches in reducing weight parameters. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2023. We extracted all outcomes as mean change from the baseline. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval were used as a summary measure. All analysis was conducted with R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31) and R Studio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022) (RStudio, Inc.). Included surgeries were: Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD-RYGB), Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Gastric Plication (LGP), Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS), Single-anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB), Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Gastric plication, Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), and Intra-gastric balloon (IGB). Only clinical trials were included, with outcomes focused on weight parameters such as reductions in BMI (kg/m²), weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), fat mass (kg), and excess weight loss (EWL) (%). Our analysis of 67 studies showed that SADI-S was the best surgical technique in decreasing BMI (kg/m2) (MD = -18.06; 95% CI [-25.31; -10.81]) and DS follows in efficacy with a P-score (MD = -18.88; 95% CI [-31.15; -6.62]) however the pooled analysis was heterogeneous (I2 = 98.5%). For weight (kg), waist circumference (cm), and fat mass (kg), BPD-RYGB was the best surgical technique to reduce these parameters (MD = -41.48; 95% CI [-47.80, -35.51], MD = -29.08; 95% CI [-37.16, -21.00], and MD = -31.11; 95% CI [-38.77, -23.46]; respectively). The pooled analysis was heterogeneous except in fat mass (I2 = 0%, p-value = 0.8). Our network meta-analysis showed that the best surgical technique in increasing EWL (%) was RY-DS (MD = -61.27; % CI [-91.72; -30.82]) the next one in efficacy according to P-score was LVBG (MD = -59.03; % CI [-84.47; -33.59]). SADI-S is most effective in reducing BMI followed by RYGB. DS was associated with most estimated weight loss %.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢手术和减肥手术的比较效果:网络荟萃分析。
建议体重不健康的患者接受减肥手术。我们的研究旨在对不同减肥手术方法在减轻体重方面的参数进行比较和排序。我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 9 月的 MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库。我们将所有结果提取为与基线相比的平均变化。平均差异和 95% 的置信区间被用作总结性指标。所有分析均使用 R version 4.2.2 (2022-10-31) 和 R Studio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022) (RStudio, Inc.) 进行。纳入的手术包括胆胰转流术(BPD-RYGB)、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)、腹腔镜胃折叠术(LGP)、十二指肠空肠旁路袖带术(DJBS)、单吻合胃旁路术(SAGB)、腹腔镜垂直胃束带成形术(LVBG)、袖状胃切除术(SG)、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)、胃成形术、胆胰转流术(BPD)和胃内气球(IGB)。这些研究只包括临床试验,其结果主要集中在体重参数上,如体重指数(BMI)(千克/平方米)、体重(千克)、腰围(厘米)、脂肪量(千克)和超重(EWL)(%)的减少。我们对 67 项研究进行的分析表明,SADI-S 是降低 BMI(kg/m2)的最佳手术技术(MD = -18.06;95% CI [-25.31;-10.81]),DS 的疗效以 P 值(MD = -18.88;95% CI [-31.15;-6.62])紧随其后,但汇总分析结果存在差异(I2 = 98.5%)。就体重(千克)、腰围(厘米)和脂肪量(千克)而言,BPD-RYGB 是降低这些参数的最佳手术技术(MD = -41.48; 95% CI [-47.80, -35.51],MD = -29.08; 95% CI [-37.16, -21.00],MD = -31.11; 95% CI [-38.77, -23.46])。除脂肪量(I2 = 0%,P 值 = 0.8)外,汇总分析存在异质性。我们的网络荟萃分析表明,RY-DS(MD = -61.27;% CI [-91.72;-30.82])是增加 EWL(%)的最佳手术技术,而根据 P 值,疗效次之的是 LVBG(MD = -59.03;% CI [-84.47;-33.59])。SADI-S 在降低体重指数方面最为有效,其次是 RYGB。DS与估计体重减轻率最高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the evidence for health benefits of low-level weight loss: a systematic review. The association of overweight, obesity, and long-term obesity with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a meta-analysis of 9 population-based cohorts from the Netherlands Cohorts Consortium. Shaping childhood obesity: behavioral and environmental risk factors associated with body mass index trajectories between 2 and 9 years in Samoan children. U.S. weight trends: a longitudinal analysis of an NIH-partnered dataset. Association between body shape index and arterial stiffness: results of the EVasCu study and a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1