Comparison between early and late weight bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03796-1
Mohammed Bagir Al-Sharaa, Mustafa M Al-Edanni, Mohammed Sh Al-Edanni, Ali Ehsan Alwindawi
{"title":"Comparison between early and late weight bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.","authors":"Mohammed Bagir Al-Sharaa, Mustafa M Al-Edanni, Mohammed Sh Al-Edanni, Ali Ehsan Alwindawi","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03796-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a strip of dense connective tissue that runs from the femur to the tibia with a relatively poor blood supply. It prevents the femoral condyles from rolling posteriorly. ACL is commonly injured in any knee trauma, ranging from a little sprain to a total rupture. The arthroscope is the gold standard approach for identifying ACL tears, which may be treated conservatively or surgically.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To assess the efficiency of immediate and delayed weight bearing after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Cohort longitudinal study carried through 6 years from 2017 to 2023 et al.-kindy Teaching, Ulamaa, and Almuktar hospitals 186 patients, the patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, group A (n = 93) with immediate (after 10 days) weight bearing and group B (n = 93) with delayed (after 1 month) weight bearing following ACL reconstruction. any patients with chondral lesions, aged less than 19 or more than 40 years, knee osteoarthritis, ligament damage, and deformity in lower extremities were excluded. Patients from both groups A and B had complete ACL tears and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction follow-up for 6 months duration regarding stiffness, infection, giving up pain, swelling, and quadriceps muscle atrophy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, there were 93 patients,70 male and 23 female, and meniscal injury was 89 patients. While in group B (93 patients) 57 male and 36 female, meniscal injury in group B was 91. There is a statistically significant difference regarding knee swelling. (80.6% in group A, and 10.8% in group B), and knee pain in which (79.6% in group A patients and only 7.5% in group B). There is no significant value between the two groups about the knee getting given up, infection, stiffness, and quadriceps muscle atrophy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delay weight bearing after ACL reconstruction makes the patients less prone to knee pain and effusion but more prone to quadriceps muscle atrophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03796-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a strip of dense connective tissue that runs from the femur to the tibia with a relatively poor blood supply. It prevents the femoral condyles from rolling posteriorly. ACL is commonly injured in any knee trauma, ranging from a little sprain to a total rupture. The arthroscope is the gold standard approach for identifying ACL tears, which may be treated conservatively or surgically.

Aim of the study: To assess the efficiency of immediate and delayed weight bearing after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Material and methods: Cohort longitudinal study carried through 6 years from 2017 to 2023 et al.-kindy Teaching, Ulamaa, and Almuktar hospitals 186 patients, the patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, group A (n = 93) with immediate (after 10 days) weight bearing and group B (n = 93) with delayed (after 1 month) weight bearing following ACL reconstruction. any patients with chondral lesions, aged less than 19 or more than 40 years, knee osteoarthritis, ligament damage, and deformity in lower extremities were excluded. Patients from both groups A and B had complete ACL tears and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction follow-up for 6 months duration regarding stiffness, infection, giving up pain, swelling, and quadriceps muscle atrophy.

Results: In group A, there were 93 patients,70 male and 23 female, and meniscal injury was 89 patients. While in group B (93 patients) 57 male and 36 female, meniscal injury in group B was 91. There is a statistically significant difference regarding knee swelling. (80.6% in group A, and 10.8% in group B), and knee pain in which (79.6% in group A patients and only 7.5% in group B). There is no significant value between the two groups about the knee getting given up, infection, stiffness, and quadriceps muscle atrophy.

Conclusion: Delay weight bearing after ACL reconstruction makes the patients less prone to knee pain and effusion but more prone to quadriceps muscle atrophy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前十字韧带重建手术后早期和晚期负重的比较。
背景:前十字韧带(ACL)是一条从股骨延伸到胫骨的致密结缔组织,血液供应相对较差。它能防止股骨髁向后滚动。前交叉韧带常见于膝关节外伤,轻则扭伤,重则完全断裂。关节镜是识别前交叉韧带撕裂的金标准方法,可采取保守治疗或手术治疗:研究目的:评估关节镜前交叉韧带重建术后立即和延迟负重的效率:Kindy教学医院、Ulamaa医院和Almuktar医院的186名患者被随机分为两组,A组(n=93)在前交叉韧带重建术后立即(10天后)负重,B组(n=93)在前交叉韧带重建术后延迟(1个月后)负重,排除任何软骨损伤、年龄小于19岁或大于40岁、膝关节骨关节炎、韧带损伤和下肢畸形的患者。A 组和 B 组患者均为前交叉韧带完全撕裂,并接受了为期 6 个月的关节镜前交叉韧带重建术随访,随访内容包括僵硬、感染、放弃疼痛、肿胀和股四头肌萎缩:A 组有 93 名患者,其中男性 70 名,女性 23 名,半月板损伤患者 89 名。而在 B 组(93 名患者)中,男性 57 人,女性 36 人,半月板损伤人数为 91 人。膝关节肿胀在统计学上有显著差异。(A组为80.6%,B组为10.8%)和膝关节疼痛(A组患者为79.6%,B组仅为7.5%)。在膝关节放弃、感染、僵硬和股四头肌萎缩方面,两组之间没有明显差异:结论:前交叉韧带重建术后延迟负重使患者不易出现膝关节疼痛和渗液,但更易出现股四头肌萎缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
期刊最新文献
Serum FoxO1 and SIRT2 concentrations in healthy pregnant women and complicated by preeclampsia. The role of clinical pharmacist in the management of resistant hypertension. Ultrasound-guided vs. laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gender disparities in extreme psychological distress at cancer diagnosis and patients access to psycho-oncological care. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical and pathologic stages of patients diagnosed with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1