Stefano Bianchi MD , Domenico Marchesano MD , Michele Magnocavallo MD , Marco Polselli MD , Paolo di Renzi MD , Gianmarco Grimaldi MD , Filippo Maria Cauti MD, PhD , Cristian Borrazzo Med Ph , Randa El Gawhary Med Ph , Antonio Bisignani MD, PhD , Massimiliano Campoli MD , Alessandra Castelluccia MD , Daniele Porcelli MD , Pietro Rossi MD, PhD , PierCarlo Gentile MD
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Radioablation for Septal Ventricular Tachycardias","authors":"Stefano Bianchi MD , Domenico Marchesano MD , Michele Magnocavallo MD , Marco Polselli MD , Paolo di Renzi MD , Gianmarco Grimaldi MD , Filippo Maria Cauti MD, PhD , Cristian Borrazzo Med Ph , Randa El Gawhary Med Ph , Antonio Bisignani MD, PhD , Massimiliano Campoli MD , Alessandra Castelluccia MD , Daniele Porcelli MD , Pietro Rossi MD, PhD , PierCarlo Gentile MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) was introduced to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to catheter ablation. No data are now available in the septal VT substrate setting, representing a challenge when using conventional techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study sought to evaluate the arrhythmic burden in patients with septal VT treated with magnetic resonance-guided STAR (MRgSTAR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled consecutive patients with septal VT substrate. The therapy target was achieved by combining anatomic/functional and electrophysiologic information. Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25 Gy adopting MRgSTAR. All patients were clinically followed up, and all implantable cardiac devices were remotely monitored. The efficacy outcome included recurrences of any sustained VT beyond the 6-week blanking period after MRgSTAR. The safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events and atrioventricular block.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 11 patients with septal substrate VT (median age: 68 years; Q1-Q3: 64.5-78 years; 100% male). Clinical presentation was an electrical storm in 81.8% of patients. No complications occurred after MRgSTAR, and 6 (54.5%) patients were discharged on the same day of treatment. During a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months, the efficacy outcome occurred in 3 (27.3%) cases. A significative reduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (23.6 before MRgSTAR vs 1.7 after MRgSTAR; <em>P</em> < 0.001) was observed. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly after treatment (38% [Q1-Q3: 33.5%-42.0%] before MRgSTAR vs 43.8% [Q1-Q3: 35%-47%] after MRgSTAR; <em>P</em> = 0.04). No adverse effects were observed in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and lead system; in the 7 patients with preserved atrioventricular conduction, no atrioventricular block was reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MRgSTAR represents a safe and effective strategy for treating septal VT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":"10 12","pages":"Pages 2569-2580"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24007497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) was introduced to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to catheter ablation. No data are now available in the septal VT substrate setting, representing a challenge when using conventional techniques.
Objectives
This study sought to evaluate the arrhythmic burden in patients with septal VT treated with magnetic resonance-guided STAR (MRgSTAR).
Methods
We enrolled consecutive patients with septal VT substrate. The therapy target was achieved by combining anatomic/functional and electrophysiologic information. Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25 Gy adopting MRgSTAR. All patients were clinically followed up, and all implantable cardiac devices were remotely monitored. The efficacy outcome included recurrences of any sustained VT beyond the 6-week blanking period after MRgSTAR. The safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events and atrioventricular block.
Results
We included 11 patients with septal substrate VT (median age: 68 years; Q1-Q3: 64.5-78 years; 100% male). Clinical presentation was an electrical storm in 81.8% of patients. No complications occurred after MRgSTAR, and 6 (54.5%) patients were discharged on the same day of treatment. During a mean follow-up of 12 ± 6 months, the efficacy outcome occurred in 3 (27.3%) cases. A significative reduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (23.6 before MRgSTAR vs 1.7 after MRgSTAR; P < 0.001) was observed. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly after treatment (38% [Q1-Q3: 33.5%-42.0%] before MRgSTAR vs 43.8% [Q1-Q3: 35%-47%] after MRgSTAR; P = 0.04). No adverse effects were observed in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and lead system; in the 7 patients with preserved atrioventricular conduction, no atrioventricular block was reported.
Conclusions
MRgSTAR represents a safe and effective strategy for treating septal VT.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.