Transseptal Transition Patterns During Left Bundle Branch Area Lead Implantation.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Clinical electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.025
Marek Jastrzębski, Grzegorz Kiełbasa, Paweł Moskal, Agnieszka Bednarek, Marek Rajzer, Haran Burri, Karol Curila, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
{"title":"Transseptal Transition Patterns During Left Bundle Branch Area Lead Implantation.","authors":"Marek Jastrzębski, Grzegorz Kiełbasa, Paweł Moskal, Agnieszka Bednarek, Marek Rajzer, Haran Burri, Karol Curila, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous deep septal pacing and signal recording during implantation of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) lead enables to monitor beat-to-beat changes of electrocardiogram (ECG) and myocardial current of injury (COI) as the lead crosses the septum.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to characterize patterns of continuous QRS, ST-T, and COI change for monitoring of the lead depth and instantaneous determination of the obtained capture type (LBBP vs left ventricular septal pacing [LVSP]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ECG and COI during lead implantation were scrutinized for sudden changes of V<sub>6</sub> R-wave peak time, V<sub>1</sub> initial and terminal R-wave amplitude, V<sub>3</sub>-V<sub>6</sub> R-wave amplitude, repolarization pattern and S-wave amplitude in I, V<sub>5</sub>-V<sub>6</sub>, and COI drop. The sudden and gradual transition patterns were diagnosed depending on the presence or absence of the above beat-to-beat ECG phenomena, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 212 pacemaker recipients were analyzed; LBBP and LVSP were obtained in 77.4% and 22.6%, respectively. There were 4.7 ± 2.1 and 0.2 ± 0.6 beat-to-beat phenomena in LBBP and LVSP patients, respectively. The sudden transition pattern, recognized in 80.7%, had sensitivity and specificity for LBBP diagnosis of 98.8% and 81.2%, respectively. A sudden drop of COI (29.4 ± 8.5 mV to 12.8 ± 4.9 mV) was observed in 53.9% patients (LBBP was simultaneously obtained in 92.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Capture of left bundle branch during lead penetration is a beat-to-beat phenomenon. Two transseptal transition patterns were identified: 1) sudden, which is typical for obtaining LBBP; and 2) gradual, which is typical for obtaining LVSP. A sudden COI drop, a very observable phenomenon, also identified reaching the left subendocardial area.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous deep septal pacing and signal recording during implantation of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) lead enables to monitor beat-to-beat changes of electrocardiogram (ECG) and myocardial current of injury (COI) as the lead crosses the septum.

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize patterns of continuous QRS, ST-T, and COI change for monitoring of the lead depth and instantaneous determination of the obtained capture type (LBBP vs left ventricular septal pacing [LVSP]).

Methods: The ECG and COI during lead implantation were scrutinized for sudden changes of V6 R-wave peak time, V1 initial and terminal R-wave amplitude, V3-V6 R-wave amplitude, repolarization pattern and S-wave amplitude in I, V5-V6, and COI drop. The sudden and gradual transition patterns were diagnosed depending on the presence or absence of the above beat-to-beat ECG phenomena, respectively.

Results: A total of 212 pacemaker recipients were analyzed; LBBP and LVSP were obtained in 77.4% and 22.6%, respectively. There were 4.7 ± 2.1 and 0.2 ± 0.6 beat-to-beat phenomena in LBBP and LVSP patients, respectively. The sudden transition pattern, recognized in 80.7%, had sensitivity and specificity for LBBP diagnosis of 98.8% and 81.2%, respectively. A sudden drop of COI (29.4 ± 8.5 mV to 12.8 ± 4.9 mV) was observed in 53.9% patients (LBBP was simultaneously obtained in 92.7%).

Conclusions: Capture of left bundle branch during lead penetration is a beat-to-beat phenomenon. Two transseptal transition patterns were identified: 1) sudden, which is typical for obtaining LBBP; and 2) gradual, which is typical for obtaining LVSP. A sudden COI drop, a very observable phenomenon, also identified reaching the left subendocardial area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左束支区导联植入过程中的跨节转换模式
背景:在植入左束支起搏(LBBP)导联过程中进行连续的室间隔深部起搏和信号记录,可监测导联穿过室间隔时心电图(ECG)和心肌损伤电流(COI)的逐搏变化:本研究旨在描述连续 QRS、ST-T 和 COI 变化的模式,以监测导联深度并即时确定所获得的捕获类型(LBBP 与左室间隔起搏 [LVSP]):方法:仔细观察导联植入过程中的心电图和 COI,观察 V6 R 波峰值时间、V1 R 波初始和终末振幅、V3-V6 R 波振幅、I、V5-V6 的复极化模式和 S 波振幅以及 COI 下降的突然变化。根据有无上述逐次搏动的心电图现象,分别诊断为骤变和渐变模式:结果:共分析了 212 名起搏器接受者,其中 77.4% 和 22.6% 分别获得了 LBBP 和 LVSP。在 LBBP 和 LVSP 患者中分别出现了 4.7 ± 2.1 和 0.2 ± 0.6 次跳动现象。80.7%的患者能识别突然转换模式,其对 LBBP 诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 98.8% 和 81.2%。53.9%的患者观察到COI突然下降(29.4 ± 8.5 mV至12.8 ± 4.9 mV)(92.7%的患者同时获得LBBP):结论:左束支在导联穿刺过程中被捕获是一种逐搏现象。结论:导联穿刺时捕获左束支是一种逐搏现象:1)突然,这是获得 LBBP 的典型模式;2)渐进,这是获得 LVSP 的典型模式。还发现了到达左心内膜下区域的 COI 骤降,这是一种非常容易观察到的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Interlesion Time on Lesion Geometry in the Creation of Radiofrequency Linear Lesions. Lead Longevity in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Patients: The Impact of Patient Somatic Growth. Temporal Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in the Elderly: Incidence of MACE and Recurrence Rates. Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmias: State-of-the-Art Review of Anatomy, Mapping, and Ablation Strategies. Accuracy of Smartwatches for Atrial Fibrillation Detection Over Time: Insights From the Basel Wearable Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1