Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1111/jce.16463
Akira Fukui MD, PhD, Kei Hirota MD, PhD, Kazuki Mitarai MD, Hidekazu Kondo MD, PhD, Takanori Yamaguchi MD, PhD, Tetsuji Shinohara MD, PhD, Naohiko Takahashi MD, PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction","authors":"Akira Fukui MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kei Hirota MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kazuki Mitarai MD,&nbsp;Hidekazu Kondo MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takanori Yamaguchi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tetsuji Shinohara MD, PhD,&nbsp;Naohiko Takahashi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jce.16463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the long-term outcomes and subclinical HF after nonparoxysmal AF ablation in HFpEF patients have not been fully evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>One-hundred-ninety nonparoxysmal AF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who underwent first-time AF ablation were studied. HFpEF was diagnosed from a history of congestive HF and/or combined criteria of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, including average septal-lateral E/e' and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Ninety-five patients with HFpEF (HFpEF group) were compared with 95 patients without HF (CNT group). Low voltage area (LVA) was defined as an area with a bipolar electrogram of &lt;0.5 mV covering &gt;5% of the total left atrial surface. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF. The secondary endpoint was subclinical HFpEF defined from NT-proBNP concentration and average septal-lateral E/e' or tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity at 6–12 months after the procedure irrespective of the rhythm. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the primary composite endpoint did not differ between the two groups (mean follow-up period 707 ± 75 days, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.5330). However, significantly more patients in the HFpEF group reached the secondary endpoint (42 [44%] vs. 13 [14%], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high preablation NT-proBNP (odds ratio [OR] 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001–1.002, <i>p</i> = 0.0040) and the existence of LVA (OR 5.983, 95% CI 1.463–31.768, <i>p</i> = 0.0194) independently predicted the secondary endpoint in HFpEF patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>After nonparoxysmal AF ablation, mortality of HFpEF patients was not inferior compared to patients without coexisting HF. However, subclinical HF occasionally <b>persisted</b> especially in HFpEF patients with a high preprocedure NT-proBNP concentration and LVA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the long-term outcomes and subclinical HF after nonparoxysmal AF ablation in HFpEF patients have not been fully evaluated.

Methods and Results

One-hundred-ninety nonparoxysmal AF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who underwent first-time AF ablation were studied. HFpEF was diagnosed from a history of congestive HF and/or combined criteria of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, including average septal-lateral E/e' and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Ninety-five patients with HFpEF (HFpEF group) were compared with 95 patients without HF (CNT group). Low voltage area (LVA) was defined as an area with a bipolar electrogram of <0.5 mV covering >5% of the total left atrial surface. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF. The secondary endpoint was subclinical HFpEF defined from NT-proBNP concentration and average septal-lateral E/e' or tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity at 6–12 months after the procedure irrespective of the rhythm. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the primary composite endpoint did not differ between the two groups (mean follow-up period 707 ± 75 days, log-rank p = 0.5330). However, significantly more patients in the HFpEF group reached the secondary endpoint (42 [44%] vs. 13 [14%], p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high preablation NT-proBNP (odds ratio [OR] 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001–1.002, p = 0.0040) and the existence of LVA (OR 5.983, 95% CI 1.463–31.768, p = 0.0194) independently predicted the secondary endpoint in HFpEF patients.

Conclusion

After nonparoxysmal AF ablation, mortality of HFpEF patients was not inferior compared to patients without coexisting HF. However, subclinical HF occasionally persisted especially in HFpEF patients with a high preprocedure NT-proBNP concentration and LVA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者非阵发性心房颤动消融术的疗效和局限性。
导言:心房颤动(房颤)导管消融术可减少射血分数保留型心房颤动(HFpEF)患者的心力衰竭(HF)住院率。然而,对高频射血分数保留型心房颤动(HFpEF)患者非阵发性房颤消融术后的长期疗效和亚临床心房颤动尚未进行全面评估:研究对象为首次接受房颤消融术的 90 名左心室射血分数≥50% 的非阵发性房颤患者。HFpEF是根据充血性心力衰竭病史和/或N末端前脑钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)浓度和经胸超声心动图参数(包括平均室间隔侧E/e'和三尖瓣反流峰值速度)的综合标准诊断出来的。95 名高频心衰患者(高频心衰组)与 95 名非高频心衰患者(CNT 组)进行了比较。低电压区(LVA)定义为双极电图占左心房总表面的 5%。主要终点是任何原因导致的死亡或因 HF 恶化而住院的复合终点。次要终点是手术后 6-12 个月时,根据 NT-proBNP 浓度和平均室间隔外侧 E/e' 或三尖瓣反流峰值速度定义的亚临床 HFpEF,与心律无关。卡普兰-梅耶曲线显示,两组患者的主要复合终点没有差异(平均随访时间为 707 ± 75 天,对数秩 P = 0.5330)。然而,达到次要终点的高频血栓形成性心房颤动组患者明显更多(42 [44%] vs. 13 [14%],P 结论:高频血栓形成性心房颤动组患者的次要终点与高频血栓形成性心房颤动组患者的次要终点存在差异:非阵发性房颤消融术后,HFpEF 患者的死亡率并不比未合并 HF 的患者低。然而,亚临床心房颤动偶尔会持续存在,尤其是在手术前 NT-proBNP 浓度较高和 LVA 较高的高频心房颤动患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Abstracts From the 31st Annual International Atrial Fibrillation Symposium, February 5-7, 2026. Impact of Right Superior Pulmonary Vein Anatomy and 31-mm Cryoballoon Use on the Risk of Phrenic Nerve Injury During Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation. VASCADE MVP-XL Versus VASCADE MVP for Large-Bore Venous Access-Site Closure in Electrophysiology Procedures: A Single-Center Experience on Efficacy and Complications. Sheath Withdrawal May Represent a Mechanically Vulnerable Phase for Septal Perforation During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing. The Resynchronization Effect in Left Bundle Branch Pacing Can be Evaluated Non-Invasively With the Implementation of Lead V8.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1