Is sinus rhythm maintenance after repeat catheter ablation effective in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/jce.16464
Yasuyuki Egami, Noriyuki Kobayashi, Ayako Sugino, Masaru Abe, Mizuki Osuga, Hiroaki Nohara, Shodai Kawanami, Kohei Ukita, Akito Kawamura, Koji Yasumoto, Naotaka Okamoto, Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee, Masamichi Yano, Masami Nishino
{"title":"Is sinus rhythm maintenance after repeat catheter ablation effective in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?","authors":"Yasuyuki Egami, Noriyuki Kobayashi, Ayako Sugino, Masaru Abe, Mizuki Osuga, Hiroaki Nohara, Shodai Kawanami, Kohei Ukita, Akito Kawamura, Koji Yasumoto, Naotaka Okamoto, Yasuharu Matsunaga-Lee, Masamichi Yano, Masami Nishino","doi":"10.1111/jce.16464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance (SRM) after catheter ablation (CA) of AF (AFCA) in HFpEF has shown to reduce adverse events as compared to medical treatment. However, it remains unclear whether SRM after a repeat CA for recurrent AF has the same effect as SRM after the initial CA in patients with AF and HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We studied 244 AF patients with HFpEF who maintained SR after repeat AFCA (repeat CA-SRM group, n = 54) and initial AFCA (initial CA-SRM group, n = 190). HFpEF were defined as HFA-PEFF score of 5 or 6 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% before the initial CA. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, or strokes within 3 years after the initial or repeat CA. The incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs. 8 of 190 [4.2%], p = .423 by a log-rank test). There was no significant difference in the 12-month HFA-PEFF score and the proportion of a 12-month HFA-PEFF score <5 between the repeat CA-SRM and the initial CA-SRM groups (5 [4,6] vs. 5 [4,6], p = .915, and 46% vs. 35%, p = .426, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with AF and HFpEF diagnosed by HFA-PEFF score, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, and strokes was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance (SRM) after catheter ablation (CA) of AF (AFCA) in HFpEF has shown to reduce adverse events as compared to medical treatment. However, it remains unclear whether SRM after a repeat CA for recurrent AF has the same effect as SRM after the initial CA in patients with AF and HFpEF.

Methods and results: We studied 244 AF patients with HFpEF who maintained SR after repeat AFCA (repeat CA-SRM group, n = 54) and initial AFCA (initial CA-SRM group, n = 190). HFpEF were defined as HFA-PEFF score of 5 or 6 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% before the initial CA. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, or strokes within 3 years after the initial or repeat CA. The incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs. 8 of 190 [4.2%], p = .423 by a log-rank test). There was no significant difference in the 12-month HFA-PEFF score and the proportion of a 12-month HFA-PEFF score <5 between the repeat CA-SRM and the initial CA-SRM groups (5 [4,6] vs. 5 [4,6], p = .915, and 46% vs. 35%, p = .426, respectively).

Conclusions: In patients with AF and HFpEF diagnosed by HFA-PEFF score, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, and strokes was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动合并射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者重复导管消融术后维持窦性心律是否有效?
背景:射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HF)和心房颤动(AF)与高发病率和高死亡率有关。最近,与药物治疗相比,在导管消融房颤(AFCA)后维持窦性心律(SRM)可减少不良事件的发生。然而,对于房颤和高频心衰患者来说,复发房颤再次导管消融后的 SRM 是否与首次导管消融后的 SRM 具有相同的效果,目前仍不清楚:我们研究了 244 名房颤合并高频低搏动患者,他们在重复 AFCA(重复 CA-SRM 组,n = 54)和首次 AFCA(首次 CA-SRM 组,n = 190)后保持了 SR。HFpEF 的定义是 HFA-PEFF 评分为 5 分或 6 分,初始 CA 前左心室射血分数≥ 50%。主要终点是首次或重复 CA 后 3 年内的全因死亡率、HF 住院率或脑卒中的综合指数。重复 CA-SRM 组和首次 CA-SRM 组的主要终点发生率相似(54 例中 3 例 [5.6%] vs. 190 例中 8 例 [4.2%],对数秩检验 p = .423)。12 个月的 HFA-PEFF 评分和 12 个月的 HFA-PEFF 评分比例无明显差异:对于通过 HFA-PEFF 评分确诊的房颤和 HFpEF 患者,重复 CA-SRM 组和初始 CA-SRM 组的主要终点(全因死亡率、HF 住院率和脑卒中)相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of palpitations in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions. Body mass index as a determinant of scar formation post-AF ablation: Insights from DECAAF II. Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Frequency and Genotype-Dependence of intrinsic chronotropic insufficiency among patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Endocardial ablation of ganglionated plexus for the treatment of carotid sinus syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1