Assessment of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma with artificial intelligence algorithms.
Aida Molero, Susana Hernandez, Marta Alonso, Melina Peressini, Daniel Curto, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Esther Conde
{"title":"Assessment of PD-L1 expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma with artificial intelligence algorithms.","authors":"Aida Molero, Susana Hernandez, Marta Alonso, Melina Peressini, Daniel Curto, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Esther Conde","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To study programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included samples from 50 early-stage NSCLCs. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) stained slides (clone SP263) were scored manually and with two different AI tools (PathAI and Navify Digital Pathology) by three pathologists. TILs were digitally assessed on H&E and CD8 IHC stained sections with two different algorithms (PathAI and Navify Digital Pathology, respectively). The agreement between observers and methods for each biomarker was analysed. For PD-L1, the turn-around time (TAT) for manual versus AI-assisted scoring was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement was higher in tumours with low PD-L1 expression regardless of the approach. Both AI-powered tools identified a significantly higher number of cases equal or above 1% PD-L1 tumour proportion score as compared with manual scoring (p=0.00015), a finding with potential therapeutic implications. Regarding TAT, there were significant differences between manual scoring and AI use (p value <0.0001 for all comparisons). The total TILs density with the PathAI algorithm and the total density of CD8+ cells with the Navify Digital Pathology software were significantly correlated (τ=0.49 (95% CI 0.37, 0.61), p value<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preliminary study supports the use of AI algorithms for the scoring of PD-L1 and TILs in patients with NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To study programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.
Methods: The study included samples from 50 early-stage NSCLCs. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) stained slides (clone SP263) were scored manually and with two different AI tools (PathAI and Navify Digital Pathology) by three pathologists. TILs were digitally assessed on H&E and CD8 IHC stained sections with two different algorithms (PathAI and Navify Digital Pathology, respectively). The agreement between observers and methods for each biomarker was analysed. For PD-L1, the turn-around time (TAT) for manual versus AI-assisted scoring was recorded.
Results: Agreement was higher in tumours with low PD-L1 expression regardless of the approach. Both AI-powered tools identified a significantly higher number of cases equal or above 1% PD-L1 tumour proportion score as compared with manual scoring (p=0.00015), a finding with potential therapeutic implications. Regarding TAT, there were significant differences between manual scoring and AI use (p value <0.0001 for all comparisons). The total TILs density with the PathAI algorithm and the total density of CD8+ cells with the Navify Digital Pathology software were significantly correlated (τ=0.49 (95% CI 0.37, 0.61), p value<0.0001).
Conclusions: This preliminary study supports the use of AI algorithms for the scoring of PD-L1 and TILs in patients with NSCLC.
目的:利用人工智能(AI)算法研究早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs):研究包括50例早期NSCLC样本。PD-L1免疫组化(IHC)染色切片(克隆SP263)由三位病理学家通过人工和两种不同的人工智能工具(PathAI和Navify Digital Pathology)进行评分。用两种不同的算法(分别是 PathAI 和 Navify Digital Pathology)对 H&E 和 CD8 IHC 染色切片上的 TIL 进行数字评估。对每种生物标记物的观察者和方法之间的一致性进行了分析。对于 PD-L1,记录了人工与 AI 辅助评分的周转时间(TAT):结果:无论采用哪种方法,PD-L1 低表达肿瘤的一致性都较高。与人工评分相比(P=0.00015),两种人工智能辅助工具识别出的等于或高于1% PD-L1肿瘤比例评分的病例数量都显著增加,这一发现具有潜在的治疗意义。在 TAT 方面,人工评分与使用人工智能之间存在显著差异(P 值 结论:人工智能在肿瘤治疗中的应用具有潜在的治疗意义:这项初步研究支持使用人工智能算法对 NSCLC 患者的 PD-L1 和 TIL 进行评分。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.