Time to maximum pupil constriction is variable in neurocritical care patients.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01234-2
Abdulkadir Kamal, Emerson B Nairon, Anna Bashmakov, Salah G Aoun, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"Time to maximum pupil constriction is variable in neurocritical care patients.","authors":"Abdulkadir Kamal, Emerson B Nairon, Anna Bashmakov, Salah G Aoun, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01234-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative pupillometry (QP) use has grown exponentially. Each QP scan captures images of the pupil before, during, and after light exposure to provide component measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This study explores if the time to maximum constriction (tMC) is uniform among neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) patients. The study enrolled 50 NSICU patients with normal PLR values in a cross-sectional study and adhered to the standard of care for pupil assessments to collect data on tMC within (comparing left eye and right eye) and between patients. The mean tMC of 0.97 (0.17) s was normally distributed across all patients and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The mean tMC was similar for the left pupil (0.98 [0.16]s) and right pupil (0.96 [0.18]s; P =.546). The within-subject mean difference (left versus right eye) tMC was 0.13 (0.12)s and ranged from 0.0 to 0.56 s. The between-subject mean tMC was 0.97 (0.17) s and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The tMC does not occur at a fixed point in time. Clinical applications that seek to characterize pupil health should account for varied tMC and explore relationships to discrete outcomes to determine the clinical usefulness of tMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01234-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative pupillometry (QP) use has grown exponentially. Each QP scan captures images of the pupil before, during, and after light exposure to provide component measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This study explores if the time to maximum constriction (tMC) is uniform among neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) patients. The study enrolled 50 NSICU patients with normal PLR values in a cross-sectional study and adhered to the standard of care for pupil assessments to collect data on tMC within (comparing left eye and right eye) and between patients. The mean tMC of 0.97 (0.17) s was normally distributed across all patients and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The mean tMC was similar for the left pupil (0.98 [0.16]s) and right pupil (0.96 [0.18]s; P =.546). The within-subject mean difference (left versus right eye) tMC was 0.13 (0.12)s and ranged from 0.0 to 0.56 s. The between-subject mean tMC was 0.97 (0.17) s and ranged from 0.46 s to 1.35 s. The tMC does not occur at a fixed point in time. Clinical applications that seek to characterize pupil health should account for varied tMC and explore relationships to discrete outcomes to determine the clinical usefulness of tMC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经重症患者瞳孔收缩达到最大程度的时间是不固定的。
定量瞳孔测量法(QP)的使用呈指数级增长。每次 QP 扫描都能捕捉到瞳孔在光照射前、光照射过程中和光照射后的图像,从而提供瞳孔光反射(PLR)的成分测量值。本研究探讨了神经科学重症监护病房(NSICU)患者的最大收缩时间(tMC)是否一致。该研究以横断面研究的形式招募了 50 名瞳孔光反射值正常的神经科学重症监护病房患者,并按照瞳孔评估的护理标准收集了患者内部(左眼和右眼比较)和患者之间的 tMC 数据。所有患者的 tMC 平均值为 0.97 (0.17) 秒,呈正态分布,范围在 0.46 秒至 1.35 秒之间。受试者内平均差异(左眼与右眼)tMC 为 0.13 (0.12)秒,范围在 0.0 至 0.56 秒之间;受试者间平均 tMC 为 0.97 (0.17) 秒,范围在 0.46 秒至 1.35 秒之间。临床应用在寻求瞳孔健康特征时,应考虑不同的 tMC,并探索其与离散结果的关系,以确定 tMC 的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods. Entropy of difference works similarly to permutation entropy for the assessment of anesthesia and sleep EEG despite the lower computational effort. Noninvasive estimation of PaCO2 from volumetric capnography in animals with injured lungs: an Artificial Intelligence approach. Rapid non-invasive measurement of mitochondrial oxygen tension after microneedle pre-treatment: a feasibility study in human volunteers. Electroencephalogram monitoring during anesthesia and critical care: a guide for the clinician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1