Process-Specific Blood Biomarkers and Outcomes in COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 ARDS (APEL-COVID Study): A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.3390/jcm13195919
Olivier Lesur, Eric David Segal, Kevin Rego, Alain Mercat, Pierre Asfar, Frédéric Chagnon
{"title":"Process-Specific Blood Biomarkers and Outcomes in COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 ARDS (APEL-COVID Study): A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Olivier Lesur, Eric David Segal, Kevin Rego, Alain Mercat, Pierre Asfar, Frédéric Chagnon","doi":"10.3390/jcm13195919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often considered separate clinico-radiological entities. Whether these conditions also present a single process-specific systemic biomolecular phenotype and how this relates to patient outcomes remains unknown. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including adult patients admitted to the ICU and general floors for COVID-19-related (COVID+) or non-COVID-19-related (COVID-) acute respiratory failure during the main phase of the pandemic. The primary objective was to study blood biomarkers and outcomes among different groups and severity subsets. <b>Results:</b> A total of 132 patients were included, as follows: 67 COVID+, 54 COVID- (with 11 matched control subjects for biomarker reference), and 58 of these patients allowed for further pre- and post-analysis. The baseline apelin (APL) levels were higher in COVID+ patients (<i>p</i> < 0.0001 vs. COVID- patients) and in SARS COVID+ patients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.02 vs. ARDS), while the IL-6 levels were higher in ARDS COVID- patients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001 vs. SARS). Multivariable logistic regression analyses with cohort biomarkers and outcome parameters revealed the following: (i) log-transformed neprilysin (NEP) activity was significantly higher in COVID+ patients (1.11 [95% CI: 0.4-1.9] vs. 0.37 [95% CI: 0.1-0.8], fold change (FC): 1.43 [95% CI: 1.04-1.97], <i>p</i> = 0.029) and in SARS patients (FC: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.05-2.6], <i>p</i> = 0.032 vs. non-SARS COVID+ patients, and 1.73 [95% CI: 1.19-2.5], <i>p</i> = 0.005 vs. ARDS COVID- patients) and (ii) higher lysyl oxidase (LOX) activity and APL levels were respectively associated with death and a shorter length of hospital stay in SARS COVID+ patients (Odds Ratios (OR): 1.01 [1.00-1.02], <i>p</i> = 0.05, and OR: -0.007 [-0.013-0.0001], <i>p</i> = 0.048). <b>Conclusion:</b> Process-specific blood biomarkers exhibited distinct profiles between COVID+ and COVID- patients, and across stages of severity. NEP and LOX activities, as well as APL levels, are particularly linked to COVID+ patients and their outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04632732).</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often considered separate clinico-radiological entities. Whether these conditions also present a single process-specific systemic biomolecular phenotype and how this relates to patient outcomes remains unknown. A prospective cohort study was conducted, including adult patients admitted to the ICU and general floors for COVID-19-related (COVID+) or non-COVID-19-related (COVID-) acute respiratory failure during the main phase of the pandemic. The primary objective was to study blood biomarkers and outcomes among different groups and severity subsets. Results: A total of 132 patients were included, as follows: 67 COVID+, 54 COVID- (with 11 matched control subjects for biomarker reference), and 58 of these patients allowed for further pre- and post-analysis. The baseline apelin (APL) levels were higher in COVID+ patients (p < 0.0001 vs. COVID- patients) and in SARS COVID+ patients (p ≤ 0.02 vs. ARDS), while the IL-6 levels were higher in ARDS COVID- patients (p ≤ 0.0001 vs. SARS). Multivariable logistic regression analyses with cohort biomarkers and outcome parameters revealed the following: (i) log-transformed neprilysin (NEP) activity was significantly higher in COVID+ patients (1.11 [95% CI: 0.4-1.9] vs. 0.37 [95% CI: 0.1-0.8], fold change (FC): 1.43 [95% CI: 1.04-1.97], p = 0.029) and in SARS patients (FC: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.05-2.6], p = 0.032 vs. non-SARS COVID+ patients, and 1.73 [95% CI: 1.19-2.5], p = 0.005 vs. ARDS COVID- patients) and (ii) higher lysyl oxidase (LOX) activity and APL levels were respectively associated with death and a shorter length of hospital stay in SARS COVID+ patients (Odds Ratios (OR): 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p = 0.05, and OR: -0.007 [-0.013-0.0001], p = 0.048). Conclusion: Process-specific blood biomarkers exhibited distinct profiles between COVID+ and COVID- patients, and across stages of severity. NEP and LOX activities, as well as APL levels, are particularly linked to COVID+ patients and their outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04632732).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19与非COVID-19 ARDS过程特异性血液生物标志物和预后(APEL-COVID研究):一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
背景:严重急性呼吸系统综合征(SARS)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)通常被认为是不同的临床放射学实体。这些病症是否也呈现出单一过程特异性的全身生物分子表型,以及这与患者的预后有何关系,目前仍是未知数。我们开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,包括在大流行主要阶段因 COVID-19 相关(COVID+)或非 COVID-19 相关(COVID-)急性呼吸衰竭而入住重症监护室和普通病房的成年患者。主要目的是研究不同组别和严重程度子集的血液生物标志物和预后。研究结果共纳入 132 名患者,具体如下:其中 58 名患者可进行进一步的前后分析。COVID+患者的基线凋亡素(APL)水平较高(与COVID-患者相比,p < 0.0001),SARS COVID+患者的基线凋亡素(APL)水平较高(与ARDS相比,p ≤ 0.02),而ARDS COVID-患者的IL-6水平较高(与SARS相比,p ≤ 0.0001)。利用队列生物标志物和结局参数进行的多变量逻辑回归分析显示了以下结果:(i) COVID+ 患者的对数转换后的肾小球酶(NEP)活性明显更高(1.11 [95% CI: 0.4-1.9] vs. 0.37 [95% CI: 0.1-0.8], fold change (FC): 1.43[95%CI:1.04-1.97],p = 0.029)和 SARS 患者(FC:1.65 [95% CI:1.05-2.6],p = 0.032 vs. 非 SARS COVID+ 患者,和 1.73 [95% CI:1.19-2.5], p = 0.005 vs. ARDS COVID- 患者);(ii) 较高的溶酶体氧化酶(LOX)活性和 APL 水平分别与 SARS COVID+ 患者的死亡和较短的住院时间相关(Odds Ratios (OR): 1.01 [1.00-1.02], p = 0.05, OR: -0.007 [-0.013-0.0001], p = 0.048)。结论COVID+和COVID-患者的血液特异性生物标志物在不同的严重程度阶段表现出不同的特征。NEP和LOX活性以及APL水平与COVID+患者及其预后尤其相关(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04632732)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Syncope: An Underestimated Cause of Unexplained Syncope in the Elderly-Data from a Single High-Volume Syncope Unit. Cardiorenal Biomarkers and Cerebrovascular Risk in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease. Artificial Intelligence in Asthma and COPD: Current Status and Future Potential. Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Time Is Kidney: A Case Study and Literature Review of Bilateral Renal Compartment Syndrome After Blunt Trauma, a Rare Complication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1