Anna E Dion, James Roake, Kate Mayeda, Nicholas Elich, David Parro, Tom Nuckols, Marilyn Tseng, Suzanne Phelan
{"title":"Prevalence of Chronic Disease and Cost Effectiveness of a Free Clinic.","authors":"Anna E Dion, James Roake, Kate Mayeda, Nicholas Elich, David Parro, Tom Nuckols, Marilyn Tseng, Suzanne Phelan","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01417-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Free clinics are a widespread, yet limited research has examined the health status of people served and the cost effectiveness of free clinics. The purpose of this study was to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of chronic conditions in patients seen at a free clinic and estimate the clinic's cost-effectiveness. The study was a retrospective chart review of 350 randomly selected paper medical charts (2009-2020) and 1,676 electronic medical records (2020-2022) at the Noor free clinic in California supported by private donors, non-profits, and foundations. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from annual clinic operating costs, services provided, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved, and projected savings from preventing emergency department visits. Of the 350 paper charts reviewed, 336 met inclusion criteria. Patients had an average age of 46.6 years, with most identifying as female (60%), Hispanic (69%), Spanish-speaking (62%), and employed (59%). About 64% had incomes below the federal poverty line. Chronic conditions included overweight/obesity (75%), chronic pain (46%), hypertension (28%), hyperlipidemia (24%), type 2 diabetes (24%), and mood disorders (23%). A quarter of patients had at least one chronic condition, and over half had multiple conditions. The clinic's services in 2022 resulted in an estimated 146 QALYs saved, $11.5 million in cost savings, and a return on investment of $13.18 per $1 invested. The free clinic provided medical care to low-income, Hispanic populations without insurance who historically have been disenfranchised from healthcare access. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that it provided significant health benefits and cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01417-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Free clinics are a widespread, yet limited research has examined the health status of people served and the cost effectiveness of free clinics. The purpose of this study was to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of chronic conditions in patients seen at a free clinic and estimate the clinic's cost-effectiveness. The study was a retrospective chart review of 350 randomly selected paper medical charts (2009-2020) and 1,676 electronic medical records (2020-2022) at the Noor free clinic in California supported by private donors, non-profits, and foundations. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from annual clinic operating costs, services provided, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved, and projected savings from preventing emergency department visits. Of the 350 paper charts reviewed, 336 met inclusion criteria. Patients had an average age of 46.6 years, with most identifying as female (60%), Hispanic (69%), Spanish-speaking (62%), and employed (59%). About 64% had incomes below the federal poverty line. Chronic conditions included overweight/obesity (75%), chronic pain (46%), hypertension (28%), hyperlipidemia (24%), type 2 diabetes (24%), and mood disorders (23%). A quarter of patients had at least one chronic condition, and over half had multiple conditions. The clinic's services in 2022 resulted in an estimated 146 QALYs saved, $11.5 million in cost savings, and a return on investment of $13.18 per $1 invested. The free clinic provided medical care to low-income, Hispanic populations without insurance who historically have been disenfranchised from healthcare access. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that it provided significant health benefits and cost savings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.