Center of mass mechanics during locomotion in the arboreal squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) as a function of speed and substrate.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1242/jeb.247959
Charlotte E Miller, Michael C Granatosky, Daniel Schmitt
{"title":"Center of mass mechanics during locomotion in the arboreal squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) as a function of speed and substrate.","authors":"Charlotte E Miller, Michael C Granatosky, Daniel Schmitt","doi":"10.1242/jeb.247959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is thought that the magnitude of center of mass (COM) oscillations can affect stability and locomotor costs in arboreal animals. Previous studies have suggested that minimizing collisional losses and maximizing pendular energy exchange are effective mechanisms to reduce muscular input and energy expenditure during terrestrial locomotion. However, few studies have explored whether these mechanisms are used in an arboreal context, where stability and efficiency often act as tradeoffs. This study explores three-dimensional center of mass mechanics in an arboreal primate-the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)-moving quadrupedally at various speeds on instrumented arboreal and terrestrial supports. Using kinetic data, values of energy recovery, center of mass mechanical work and power, potential and kinetic energy congruity, and collision angle and fraction were calculated for each stride. Saimiri differed from many other mammals by having lower energy recovery. Although few differences were observed in center of mass mechanics between substrates at low or moderate speeds, as speed increased, center of mass work was done at a much greater range of rates on the pole. Collision angles were higher, while collision fractions and energy recovery values were lower on the pole, indicating less moderation of collisional losses during arboreal versus terrestrial locomotion. These data support the idea that the energetic demands of arboreal and terrestrial locomotion differ, suggesting that arboreal primates likely employ different locomotor strategies compared to their terrestrial counterparts-an important factor in the evolution of arboreal locomotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is thought that the magnitude of center of mass (COM) oscillations can affect stability and locomotor costs in arboreal animals. Previous studies have suggested that minimizing collisional losses and maximizing pendular energy exchange are effective mechanisms to reduce muscular input and energy expenditure during terrestrial locomotion. However, few studies have explored whether these mechanisms are used in an arboreal context, where stability and efficiency often act as tradeoffs. This study explores three-dimensional center of mass mechanics in an arboreal primate-the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)-moving quadrupedally at various speeds on instrumented arboreal and terrestrial supports. Using kinetic data, values of energy recovery, center of mass mechanical work and power, potential and kinetic energy congruity, and collision angle and fraction were calculated for each stride. Saimiri differed from many other mammals by having lower energy recovery. Although few differences were observed in center of mass mechanics between substrates at low or moderate speeds, as speed increased, center of mass work was done at a much greater range of rates on the pole. Collision angles were higher, while collision fractions and energy recovery values were lower on the pole, indicating less moderation of collisional losses during arboreal versus terrestrial locomotion. These data support the idea that the energetic demands of arboreal and terrestrial locomotion differ, suggesting that arboreal primates likely employ different locomotor strategies compared to their terrestrial counterparts-an important factor in the evolution of arboreal locomotion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树栖松鼠猴(Saimiri sciureus)运动时的质心力学与速度和基质的关系。
人们认为,质心(COM)摆动的幅度会影响树栖动物的稳定性和运动成本。以往的研究表明,尽量减少碰撞损失和尽量增加垂体能量交换是陆地运动中减少肌肉投入和能量消耗的有效机制。然而,很少有研究探讨在树栖环境中是否使用这些机制,因为在树栖环境中,稳定性和效率往往需要权衡。本研究探讨了树栖灵长类动物松鼠猴(Saimiri sciureus)的三维质心力学,该动物在装有仪器的树栖和陆地支撑物上以不同速度进行四足运动。利用动力学数据,计算了每步的能量回收值、质心机械功和功率、势能和动能一致性以及碰撞角和碰撞率。Saimiri与许多其他哺乳动物不同,能量回收率较低。虽然在低速或中速时,观察到不同基质上的质心力学差异不大,但随着速度的增加,极上的质心做功率范围更大。极地上的碰撞角更大,而碰撞分数和能量回收值更低,这表明树栖运动与陆栖运动相比,碰撞损失的调节作用更小。这些数据支持了这样的观点,即树栖运动和陆地运动对能量的需求不同,这表明树栖灵长类动物很可能采用了与陆地灵长类动物不同的运动策略--这也是树栖运动进化的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
期刊最新文献
How do fish miss? Attack strategies of threespine stickleback capturing non-evasive prey. Hypertonic water reabsorption with a parallel-current system via the glandular and saccular renal tubules of Ruditapes philippinarum. Skittering locomotion in cricket frogs: a form of porpoising. Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar. Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1