Support roles, carer burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of geriatric oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102079
Wing Sze Lindsay Chan , Vasi Naganathan , Abby Fyfe , Alina Mahmood , Arnav Nanda , Anne Warby , Duong Pham , Natalie Southi , Sarah Sutherland , Erin Moth
{"title":"Support roles, carer burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer","authors":"Wing Sze Lindsay Chan ,&nbsp;Vasi Naganathan ,&nbsp;Abby Fyfe ,&nbsp;Alina Mahmood ,&nbsp;Arnav Nanda ,&nbsp;Anne Warby ,&nbsp;Duong Pham ,&nbsp;Natalie Southi ,&nbsp;Sarah Sutherland ,&nbsp;Erin Moth","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older adults with cancer value the perspectives of significant others and their carers regarding decision-making about treatment. Understanding the support provided by carers, and their perspectives on involvement in treatment decision-making, can help us improve our communication with patients and their supports. We aimed to describe the roles, burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We performed a cross-sectional survey of carers of older adults (≥65y) with cancer at three centres in Sydney, Australia. Type, frequency, and perspectives on providing care were evaluated using Likert scales. Preferred and perceived role in treatment decision-making by modified Control Preferences Scale, and carer burden by Zarit Burden Index (ZBI-12), were evaluated. Preferred role in decision-making and carer burden were compared between groups (culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds [CALD], sex, and carer age ≥ 65) by chi-squared or <em>t</em>-tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One-hundred and fourteen returned surveys were included (23 partially completed). Carer characteristics: median age 55y (range 24–90), female (74 %), child (49 %) and spouse (35 %) of the care-recipient. Care-recipient characteristics: median age 75y (range 65–96), receiving anti-cancer treatment (85 %), and CALD background (44 %). Carers were frequently involved in communication and information gathering (45 % -80 %) and supported instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (43 % - 81 %) more frequently than basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (2–13 %). Most (91 %) preferred to be present when treatment options were discussed. Their preferred role in treatment decision-making was passive in 66 %, collaborative in 30 %, and active in 4 %, with most (72 %) playing their preferred role. The preferred role was associated with carer age (<em>p</em> = 0.01) and CALD background (<em>p</em> = 0.04), with younger (&lt;65y) carers and those caring for CALD older adults preferring a more passive role. Carer burden was ‘low’ in 29 %, ‘moderate’ in 31 %, and ‘high’ in 39 %, and providing psychological support was rated most challenging.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Carers of older adults with cancer play varied support roles, particularly in communication and information gathering. Carers prefer to be present for discussions about treatment options, though favour a passive role in treatment decision-making, upholding patient autonomy. Understanding the communication preferences of carers is an important consideration when supporting the patient in deciding treatment options and direction of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"15 8","pages":"Article 102079"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406824001851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Older adults with cancer value the perspectives of significant others and their carers regarding decision-making about treatment. Understanding the support provided by carers, and their perspectives on involvement in treatment decision-making, can help us improve our communication with patients and their supports. We aimed to describe the roles, burden, and decision-making preferences of carers of older adults with cancer.

Materials and Methods

We performed a cross-sectional survey of carers of older adults (≥65y) with cancer at three centres in Sydney, Australia. Type, frequency, and perspectives on providing care were evaluated using Likert scales. Preferred and perceived role in treatment decision-making by modified Control Preferences Scale, and carer burden by Zarit Burden Index (ZBI-12), were evaluated. Preferred role in decision-making and carer burden were compared between groups (culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds [CALD], sex, and carer age ≥ 65) by chi-squared or t-tests.

Results

One-hundred and fourteen returned surveys were included (23 partially completed). Carer characteristics: median age 55y (range 24–90), female (74 %), child (49 %) and spouse (35 %) of the care-recipient. Care-recipient characteristics: median age 75y (range 65–96), receiving anti-cancer treatment (85 %), and CALD background (44 %). Carers were frequently involved in communication and information gathering (45 % -80 %) and supported instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (43 % - 81 %) more frequently than basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (2–13 %). Most (91 %) preferred to be present when treatment options were discussed. Their preferred role in treatment decision-making was passive in 66 %, collaborative in 30 %, and active in 4 %, with most (72 %) playing their preferred role. The preferred role was associated with carer age (p = 0.01) and CALD background (p = 0.04), with younger (<65y) carers and those caring for CALD older adults preferring a more passive role. Carer burden was ‘low’ in 29 %, ‘moderate’ in 31 %, and ‘high’ in 39 %, and providing psychological support was rated most challenging.

Discussion

Carers of older adults with cancer play varied support roles, particularly in communication and information gathering. Carers prefer to be present for discussions about treatment options, though favour a passive role in treatment decision-making, upholding patient autonomy. Understanding the communication preferences of carers is an important consideration when supporting the patient in deciding treatment options and direction of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年癌症患者照顾者的支持角色、照顾者负担和决策偏好。
介绍:老年癌症患者非常重视重要他人及其照顾者对治疗决策的看法。了解照护者提供的支持以及他们对参与治疗决策的看法,有助于我们改善与患者及其支持者的沟通。我们旨在描述老年癌症患者照顾者的角色、负担和决策偏好:我们在澳大利亚悉尼的三个中心对癌症老年人(≥65 岁)的照顾者进行了横断面调查。采用李克特量表对护理类型、频率和提供护理的角度进行了评估。通过修改后的 "控制偏好量表"(Control Preferences Scale)评估了在治疗决策中的首选角色和感知角色,并通过扎里特负担指数(ZBI-12)评估了照护者的负担。通过卡方检验或 t 检验对不同组别(不同文化和语言背景 [CALD]、性别和照顾者年龄≥ 65 岁)在决策中的首选角色和照顾者负担进行比较:共收回 114 份调查问卷(23 份部分完成)。照顾者特征:中位数年龄 55 岁(24-90 岁不等),女性(74%),子女(49%)和配偶(35%)。护理对象特征:中位年龄 75 岁(65-96 岁不等),正在接受抗癌治疗(85%),有 CALD 背景(44%)。照护者经常参与沟通和信息收集(45 % - 80 %),支持工具性日常生活活动(IADLs)(43 % - 81 %)多于支持基本日常生活活动(ADLs)(2-13 %)。大多数患者(91%)希望在讨论治疗方案时在场。他们在治疗决策中的首选角色是被动型(66%)、合作型(30%)和主动型(4%),其中大多数人(72%)扮演自己首选的角色。首选角色与照顾者的年龄(p = 0.01)和 CALD 背景(p = 0.04)有关,年轻的照顾者(讨论:老年癌症患者的照护者扮演着不同的支持角色,尤其是在沟通和信息收集方面。照护者更愿意参与治疗方案的讨论,但在治疗决策中更倾向于扮演被动的角色,以维护患者的自主权。在支持患者决定治疗方案和护理方向时,了解照护者的沟通偏好是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Systemic and procedural challenges in transitioning patients with cancer to post-acute and long-term care facilities: A prospective mixed-methods study. The role of healthcare professionals' attitudes in treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A scoping review. "Start low, go slow," a strategy to tailor treatment dosing in older or vulnerable adults with advanced solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age disparities in clinical trials of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with high grade serous ovarian cancer: A wake up call to improving outcomes in older patients. Effects of dementia on functional decline in patients with non-small cell lung cancer at discharge from acute care hospitals: A retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1