High M2/M1 Macrophage Ratio Observed in Nasal Polyps Formed in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1369/00221554241286571
Eiichi Kato, Akifumi Muramoto, Natsumi Yonemoto, Yoshinori Matsuwaki, Masafumi Sakashita, Mana Fukushima, Shigeharu Fujieda, Motohiro Kobayashi
{"title":"High M2/M1 Macrophage Ratio Observed in Nasal Polyps Formed in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.","authors":"Eiichi Kato, Akifumi Muramoto, Natsumi Yonemoto, Yoshinori Matsuwaki, Masafumi Sakashita, Mana Fukushima, Shigeharu Fujieda, Motohiro Kobayashi","doi":"10.1369/00221554241286571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) shares similarities with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), both characterized by intractable nasal polyps. The key distinction lies in the presence of fungal infection within the nasal cavity. While ECRS nasal polyps are known for significant infiltration of M2 macrophages and eosinophils, as well as an increase in high endothelial venule (HEV)-like vessels, these features are less commonly reported in AFRS. This study compared clinicopathological findings between AFRS (<i>n</i>=10), ECRS (<i>n</i>=12), and non-ECRS (<i>n</i>=10) patients' nasal polyps using immunohistochemical analysis for CD163 and CD68 to assess the M2/M1 macrophage ratio, and peripheral lymph node addressin (PNAd) and CD34 to evaluate the proportion of HEV-like vessels. AFRS showed a significantly higher number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages and an increased M2/M1 ratio compared with ECRS. However, the percentage of HEV-like vessels and the number of eosinophils infiltrating the nasal polyps were similar in both AFRS and ECRS. The observed increase in M2 macrophages in AFRS nasal polyps is presumed to be induced by fungal infection in the nasal cavity, in comparison with ECRS. These results highlight the distinctive immunological profiles of AFRS and ECRS, emphasizing the role of macrophage polarization in their pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1369/00221554241286571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) shares similarities with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), both characterized by intractable nasal polyps. The key distinction lies in the presence of fungal infection within the nasal cavity. While ECRS nasal polyps are known for significant infiltration of M2 macrophages and eosinophils, as well as an increase in high endothelial venule (HEV)-like vessels, these features are less commonly reported in AFRS. This study compared clinicopathological findings between AFRS (n=10), ECRS (n=12), and non-ECRS (n=10) patients' nasal polyps using immunohistochemical analysis for CD163 and CD68 to assess the M2/M1 macrophage ratio, and peripheral lymph node addressin (PNAd) and CD34 to evaluate the proportion of HEV-like vessels. AFRS showed a significantly higher number of CD163-positive M2 macrophages and an increased M2/M1 ratio compared with ECRS. However, the percentage of HEV-like vessels and the number of eosinophils infiltrating the nasal polyps were similar in both AFRS and ECRS. The observed increase in M2 macrophages in AFRS nasal polyps is presumed to be induced by fungal infection in the nasal cavity, in comparison with ECRS. These results highlight the distinctive immunological profiles of AFRS and ECRS, emphasizing the role of macrophage polarization in their pathogenesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在过敏性真菌性鼻炎形成的鼻息肉中观察到高 M2/M1 巨噬细胞比率
过敏性真菌性鼻炎(AFRS)与嗜酸性粒细胞慢性鼻炎(ECRS)有相似之处,都以顽固性鼻息肉为特征。两者的主要区别在于鼻腔内存在真菌感染。ECRS 鼻息肉以 M2 巨噬细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞大量浸润以及高内皮静脉(HEV)样血管增多而闻名,但这些特征在 AFRS 中较少报道。本研究比较了 AFRS(10 例)、ECRS(12 例)和非 ECRS(10 例)患者鼻息肉的临床病理结果,使用 CD163 和 CD68 免疫组化分析评估 M2/M1 巨噬细胞比率,使用外周淋巴结地址素(PNAd)和 CD34 评估 HEV 样血管的比例。与 ECRS 相比,AFRS 的 CD163 阳性 M2 巨噬细胞数量明显增多,M2/M1 比率也有所增加。然而,AFRS 和 ECRS 的 HEV 样血管比例和鼻息肉中浸润的嗜酸性粒细胞数量相似。与 ECRS 相比,在 AFRS 鼻息肉中观察到的 M2 巨噬细胞增加推测是由鼻腔真菌感染引起的。这些结果突显了 AFRS 和 ECRS 不同的免疫学特征,强调了巨噬细胞极化在其发病机制中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1