Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States based on sex.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2
Muhammad Zia Khan, Bandar Alyami, Waleed Alruwaili, Amanda T Nguyen, Melody Mendez, William E Leon, Justin Devera, Hafiz Muhammad Sohaib Hayat, Abdullah Naveed, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Siddharth Agarwal, Sudarshan Balla, Douglas Darden, Muhammad Bilal Munir
{"title":"Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States based on sex.","authors":"Muhammad Zia Khan, Bandar Alyami, Waleed Alruwaili, Amanda T Nguyen, Melody Mendez, William E Leon, Justin Devera, Hafiz Muhammad Sohaib Hayat, Abdullah Naveed, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Siddharth Agarwal, Sudarshan Balla, Douglas Darden, Muhammad Bilal Munir","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01936-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To determine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation based on sex.

Methods: For the purpose of this study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database for years 2016-2020. The study group was then stratified based on sex. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including complications were then analyzed in each group. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to analyze the association of sex with important outcomes of mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention and any vascular complication), prolonged length of stay (defined as > 6 days), and increased cost of hospitalization (defined as median cost > 34,098$) after leadless pacemaker implantation.

Results: A total of 29,000 leadless pacemakers (n in women = 12,960, 44.7%) were implanted during our study period. Women were found to have an increased burden of co-morbidities as compared to men. In the adjusted analysis, the likelihood of mortality (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.43), major complications (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18), prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15), and increased hospitalization cost (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20) were higher in women as compared to men after leadless pacemaker implantation.

Conclusion: Important and significant differences exist in leadless pacemaker implantation in women as compared to men. These findings highlight the need for evaluating etiologies behind such differences with a goal of improving outcomes in all patients after leadless pacemaker implantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国无导线起搏器植入术的性别结果。
背景:旨在确定无导线起搏器植入术的基线特征和结果与性别的差异:目的:确定基于性别的无引线起搏器植入的基线特征和结果差异:本研究从全国住院患者抽样数据库中提取了 2016-2020 年的数据。然后根据性别对研究组进行分层。然后分析各组的基线特征和院内结局(包括并发症)。建立多变量逻辑回归模型,分析性别与无引线起搏器植入术后死亡率、主要并发症(定义为需要介入治疗的心包积液和任何血管并发症)、住院时间延长(定义为大于 6 天)和住院费用增加(定义为费用中位数大于 34,098 美元)等重要结果的相关性:研究期间共植入了 29,000 个无引线起搏器(女性为 12,960 个,占 44.7%)。与男性相比,女性的并发症负担更重。在调整分析中,与男性相比,女性在无引线起搏器植入术后的死亡率(aOR 1.27,95% CI 1.14-1.43)、主要并发症(aOR 1.07,95% CI 0.98-1.18)、住院时间延长(aOR 1.09,95% CI 1.04-1.15)和住院费用增加(aOR 1.14,95% CI 1.08-1.20)的可能性更高:结论:与男性相比,女性在无引线起搏器植入方面存在重要且显著的差异。结论:在无导线起搏器植入术中,女性与男性存在重要且显著的差异,这些发现强调了评估这些差异背后病因的必要性,目的是改善所有无导线起搏器植入术患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
期刊最新文献
A new stepwise approach to minimize phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Catheter ablation in rate-controlled atrial fibrillation with severely reduced ejection fraction: intervention for irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy. Efficacy, safety, and somatosensory comparison of pulsed-field ablation and thermal ablation: outcomes from a 2-year follow-up. Differential and synergistic effects of right and left atrial ganglionated plexi ablation in patients undergoing cardioneuroablation: results from the ELEGANCE multicenter study. Upstream targeting for the prevention of atrial fibrillation: Targeting Risk Interventions and Metformin for Atrial Fibrillation (TRIM-AF)-rationale and study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1