Differences in Prevalence and Psychosocial Characteristics of Irritable Bowel Syndrome According to Rome III and Rome IV Criteria in Medical and Nursing Students.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.5056/jnm22067
Ji Hwan Park, Hyeok Jun Jeong, Ka Eun Lee, Hong Sub Lee, Seung Jung Yu, Jun Sik Yoon, Eun Jeong Choi, Jung Ho Park, Ki Bae Bang, Ju Seok Kim, Yong Sung Kim
{"title":"Differences in Prevalence and Psychosocial Characteristics of Irritable Bowel Syndrome According to Rome III and Rome IV Criteria in Medical and Nursing Students.","authors":"Ji Hwan Park, Hyeok Jun Jeong, Ka Eun Lee, Hong Sub Lee, Seung Jung Yu, Jun Sik Yoon, Eun Jeong Choi, Jung Ho Park, Ki Bae Bang, Ju Seok Kim, Yong Sung Kim","doi":"10.5056/jnm22067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>In Korea, changes in the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after the Rome IV update have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study is to compare the prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of IBS according to Rome III and Rome IV criteria in medical and nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 13, 2021 to October 22, 2021, participants were enrolled and surveyed online. The survey includes general and specific questions for disease diagnosis and regarding participants' social and psychological characteristics using the 36-item short form survey, the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument-Korean version, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 338 medical students and 102 nursing students completed the survey. IBS was diagnosed in 78 students (17.7%) using Rome III criteria and in 51 students (11.6%) using Rome IV criteria. Significant differences in physical functioning score and severity score were observed between patients diagnosed using Rome IV criteria and patients diagnosed using Rome III criteria. Multiple logistic regression revealed that severity score (adjusted odds ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.21; <i>P</i> = 0.022) is the only predictor of IBS that differentiates Rome IV criteria from Rome III criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even after updating the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of IBS in medical and nursing students in Korea remained high. Patients who met the Rome IV criteria had more severe symptoms and lower quality of life than patients who met the Rome III criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm22067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: In Korea, changes in the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after the Rome IV update have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study is to compare the prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of IBS according to Rome III and Rome IV criteria in medical and nursing students.

Methods: From August 13, 2021 to October 22, 2021, participants were enrolled and surveyed online. The survey includes general and specific questions for disease diagnosis and regarding participants' social and psychological characteristics using the 36-item short form survey, the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument-Korean version, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: In total, 338 medical students and 102 nursing students completed the survey. IBS was diagnosed in 78 students (17.7%) using Rome III criteria and in 51 students (11.6%) using Rome IV criteria. Significant differences in physical functioning score and severity score were observed between patients diagnosed using Rome IV criteria and patients diagnosed using Rome III criteria. Multiple logistic regression revealed that severity score (adjusted odds ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.21; P = 0.022) is the only predictor of IBS that differentiates Rome IV criteria from Rome III criteria.

Conclusions: Even after updating the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of IBS in medical and nursing students in Korea remained high. Patients who met the Rome IV criteria had more severe symptoms and lower quality of life than patients who met the Rome III criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据罗马 III 和罗马 IV 标准,医科学生和护理专业学生肠易激综合征患病率和心理社会特征的差异。
背景/目的:在韩国,尚未对罗马IV标准更新后肠易激综合征(IBS)患病率的变化进行广泛研究。本研究旨在根据罗马III和罗马IV标准,比较医学生和护理专业学生肠易激综合征的患病率和社会心理风险因素:方法:2021 年 8 月 13 日至 2021 年 10 月 22 日,对参与者进行在线注册和调查。调查内容包括疾病诊断的一般问题和具体问题,以及有关参与者社会和心理特征的问题,采用 36 项简表调查、韩国版简易社会心理测验和医院焦虑抑郁量表:共有 338 名医学专业学生和 102 名护理专业学生完成了调查。78名学生(17.7%)根据罗马III标准被诊断为肠易激综合征,51名学生(11.6%)根据罗马IV标准被诊断为肠易激综合征。采用罗马 IV 标准诊断的患者与采用罗马 III 标准诊断的患者在身体功能评分和严重程度评分方面存在显著差异。多元逻辑回归显示,严重程度评分(调整后的几率比=1.01;95% 置信区间:1.00-1.21;P=0.022)是区分罗马 IV 标准和罗马 III 标准的唯一 IBS 预测因子:结论:即使更新了罗马 IV 诊断标准,韩国医科和护理专业学生的肠易激综合征患病率仍然很高。符合罗马IV标准的患者比符合罗马III标准的患者症状更严重,生活质量更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1