Gender differences in spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: prospective cohort study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231388
Mark A MacLean, Raphaële Charest-Morin, Alexandra Stratton, Supriya Singh, Adrienne M Kelly, Gwynedd E Pickett, Andrew Glennie, Christopher Bailey, Michael H Weber, Najmedden Attabib, Ahmed Cherry, Eric Crawford, Jerome Paquet, Nicolas Dea, Andrew Nataraj, Edward Abraham, Kelechi C Eseonu, Michael G Johnson, Hamilton Hall, Kenneth Thomas, Greg McIntosh, Charles G Fisher, Y Raja Rampersaud, Ryan Greene, Sean D Christie
{"title":"Gender differences in spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: prospective cohort study.","authors":"Mark A MacLean, Raphaële Charest-Morin, Alexandra Stratton, Supriya Singh, Adrienne M Kelly, Gwynedd E Pickett, Andrew Glennie, Christopher Bailey, Michael H Weber, Najmedden Attabib, Ahmed Cherry, Eric Crawford, Jerome Paquet, Nicolas Dea, Andrew Nataraj, Edward Abraham, Kelechi C Eseonu, Michael G Johnson, Hamilton Hall, Kenneth Thomas, Greg McIntosh, Charles G Fisher, Y Raja Rampersaud, Ryan Greene, Sean D Christie","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite efforts toward achieving gender-based equality in clinical trial enrollment, females are frequently underrepresented and gender-specific data analysis is lacking. Identifying and addressing gender bias in medical decision-making and outcome reporting may facilitate more equitable healthcare delivery. This study aimed to determine if gender differences exist in the clinical evaluation and surgical management of patients with degenerative lumbar conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions (disc herniation [DH], spinal canal stenosis [SCS], and degenerative spondylolisthesis [DS]) were prospectively enrolled across 16 tertiary academic centers. Outcome domains included pain, disability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), expectations of surgery, and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Covariates pertaining to the preoperative use of healthcare resources, diagnostic testing, and visits to healthcare providers were compared between genders before and after propensity score matching for 13 baseline demographic and procedural variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed for 5038 patients (2396 female, 2642 male) with degenerative spinal pathologies including SCS (40.2%), DS (33.2%), and DH (26.6%). Surgical treatment effect was similar for both genders. For all conditions, female patients had worse pre- and postoperative pain, disability, and HRQOL. Significant gender differences were identified for marital status, education, employment status, exercise activities, and disability claims. Female patients were more likely to use select medications, diagnostic imaging tests, and nonsurgical therapeutic interventions, and access various healthcare providers. Findings were similar following post hoc propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, male and female patients benefitted similarly from surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. However, female patients had worse preoperative clinical assessment scores and were more likely to use select healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.SPINE231388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite efforts toward achieving gender-based equality in clinical trial enrollment, females are frequently underrepresented and gender-specific data analysis is lacking. Identifying and addressing gender bias in medical decision-making and outcome reporting may facilitate more equitable healthcare delivery. This study aimed to determine if gender differences exist in the clinical evaluation and surgical management of patients with degenerative lumbar conditions.

Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions (disc herniation [DH], spinal canal stenosis [SCS], and degenerative spondylolisthesis [DS]) were prospectively enrolled across 16 tertiary academic centers. Outcome domains included pain, disability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), expectations of surgery, and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Covariates pertaining to the preoperative use of healthcare resources, diagnostic testing, and visits to healthcare providers were compared between genders before and after propensity score matching for 13 baseline demographic and procedural variables.

Results: Data were analyzed for 5038 patients (2396 female, 2642 male) with degenerative spinal pathologies including SCS (40.2%), DS (33.2%), and DH (26.6%). Surgical treatment effect was similar for both genders. For all conditions, female patients had worse pre- and postoperative pain, disability, and HRQOL. Significant gender differences were identified for marital status, education, employment status, exercise activities, and disability claims. Female patients were more likely to use select medications, diagnostic imaging tests, and nonsurgical therapeutic interventions, and access various healthcare providers. Findings were similar following post hoc propensity score matching.

Conclusions: In this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, male and female patients benefitted similarly from surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. However, female patients had worse preoperative clinical assessment scores and were more likely to use select healthcare resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎退行性疾病脊柱手术的性别差异:前瞻性队列研究。
目的:尽管在临床试验注册方面努力实现基于性别的平等,但女性的代表性往往不足,而且缺乏针对不同性别的数据分析。识别并解决医疗决策和结果报告中的性别偏见可促进更公平的医疗服务。本研究旨在确定腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床评估和手术治疗中是否存在性别差异:在 16 家三级学术中心连续招募了接受脊柱手术治疗的退行性腰椎病(椎间盘突出症 [DH]、椎管狭窄症 [SCS] 和退行性脊椎滑脱症 [DS])成年患者。结果包括疼痛、残疾、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)、对手术的期望以及对手术结果的满意度。在对 13 个基线人口统计学变量和手术变量进行倾向得分匹配之前和之后,比较了不同性别患者术前使用医疗资源、诊断检测和就诊医疗服务提供者的相关变量:分析了 5038 名脊柱退行性病变患者(2396 名女性,2642 名男性)的数据,包括 SCS(40.2%)、DS(33.2%)和 DH(26.6%)。男女患者的手术治疗效果相似。在所有病症中,女性患者的术前和术后疼痛、残疾和 HRQOL 均较差。在婚姻状况、教育程度、就业状况、锻炼活动和残疾索赔方面,发现了显著的性别差异。女性患者更有可能使用特定药物、诊断成像检查和非手术治疗干预措施,也更有可能接触各种医疗服务提供者。在进行事后倾向得分匹配后,研究结果相似:在这项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究中,男性和女性患者从腰椎退行性疾病手术中获益相似。然而,女性患者的术前临床评估评分较低,且更有可能使用特定的医疗资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of 398 cases of intradural spinal tumor resection with primary dural closure: surgical outcomes based on the suture material. Safe, simple, and valid position for obtaining flexion-extension radiographs to assess instability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: one specific instruction can make a difference. Improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity-matched cohort analysis. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after corrective spinal surgery: association with reduction in the retrocrural space area. Is multilevel MIS-TLIF with bilateral facetectomy a lordosing procedure? A retrospective cohort of 3-level MIS-TLIF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1