Distal blocking screw augmentation in ulnar intramedullary nail fixation of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536241295520
Yong Woo Kim, Sang Ki Lee, Young Sun An
{"title":"Distal blocking screw augmentation in ulnar intramedullary nail fixation of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures.","authors":"Yong Woo Kim, Sang Ki Lee, Young Sun An","doi":"10.1177/10225536241295520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of distal blocking screws on the stability and healing of ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails. The primary research question was whether the addition of distal blocking screws enhanced fracture stabilization and promoted faster healing than the standard IM nailing techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 30 patients with ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated from February 2018 to September 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated using IM nails alone (<i>n</i> = 17) and those treated with using IM nails with distal blocking screws (<i>n</i> = 13). The surgical time, medullary canal space, fracture healing time, and complications were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Grace and Eversmann rating system, the DASH scores, and the VAS scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of distal blocking screws resulted in a slightly longer surgical time (56 min vs 47 min). However, the group with distal blocking screws had smaller medullary canal space and showed significantly faster fracture healing times (2.3 months vs 3.9 months; <i>p</i> = .036). There were no reported complications of nonunion, nerve injury, or infection in the distal blocking screw group, whereas the IM nail-only group had one case of nonunion (5.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of distal blocking screws in conjunction with IM nails for ulnar diaphyseal fractures improves fracture stability and promotes faster healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 3","pages":"10225536241295520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241295520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of distal blocking screws on the stability and healing of ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails. The primary research question was whether the addition of distal blocking screws enhanced fracture stabilization and promoted faster healing than the standard IM nailing techniques.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed medical records of 30 patients with ulnar diaphyseal fractures treated from February 2018 to September 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated using IM nails alone (n = 17) and those treated with using IM nails with distal blocking screws (n = 13). The surgical time, medullary canal space, fracture healing time, and complications were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Grace and Eversmann rating system, the DASH scores, and the VAS scores.

Results: The addition of distal blocking screws resulted in a slightly longer surgical time (56 min vs 47 min). However, the group with distal blocking screws had smaller medullary canal space and showed significantly faster fracture healing times (2.3 months vs 3.9 months; p = .036). There were no reported complications of nonunion, nerve injury, or infection in the distal blocking screw group, whereas the IM nail-only group had one case of nonunion (5.7%).

Conclusion: The use of distal blocking screws in conjunction with IM nails for ulnar diaphyseal fractures improves fracture stability and promotes faster healing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人前臂骨骺骨折尺桡侧髓内钉固定中的远端阻断螺钉增量。
目的:本研究旨在评估远端阻断螺钉对使用髓内钉(IM)治疗尺骨骺端骨折的稳定性和愈合的影响。主要研究问题是,与标准 IM 钉技术相比,加用远端阻断螺钉是否能增强骨折的稳定性并加快愈合:这项回顾性研究回顾了2018年2月至2023年9月期间接受治疗的30名尺桡骨骨骺骨折患者的病历。患者分为两组:单纯使用 IM 钉治疗的患者(n = 17)和使用 IM 钉加远端阻断螺钉治疗的患者(n = 13)。对手术时间、髓腔间隙、骨折愈合时间和并发症进行了评估。使用格雷斯和埃弗斯曼评分系统、DASH评分和VAS评分对功能结果进行评估:结果:增加远端阻断螺钉导致手术时间略有延长(56 分钟 vs 47 分钟)。然而,使用远端阻断螺钉的一组患者髓管间隙更小,骨折愈合时间明显更快(2.3 个月 vs 3.9 个月;p = 0.036)。远端阻断螺钉组未出现骨折不愈合、神经损伤或感染等并发症,而仅使用 IM 钉组出现一例骨折不愈合(5.7%):结论:在治疗尺骨骺端骨折时使用远端阻断螺钉和 IM 钉可提高骨折的稳定性并加快愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and depression as risk factors for postoperative complications and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A national database study Imaging evaluation of extraarticular posterior loose bodies in varus ankle osteoarthritis Oblique sliding ulna osteotomy to treat paediatric neglected monteggia fracture dislocation. Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery. Letter to the editor regarding the article "knocking-down long non-coding RNA LINC01094 prohibits chondrocyte apoptosis via regulating microRNA-577/metal-regulatory transcription factor 1 axis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1