Assessing the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Routine Clinical Care of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients: A Canadian Perspective.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/19160216241288806
Hugh Andrew Jinwook Kim, Daniel J Lee, Dongho Shin, Garret Horton, Monique Gignac, John M Lee, Yvonne Chan
{"title":"Assessing the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Routine Clinical Care of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients: A Canadian Perspective.","authors":"Hugh Andrew Jinwook Kim, Daniel J Lee, Dongho Shin, Garret Horton, Monique Gignac, John M Lee, Yvonne Chan","doi":"10.1177/19160216241288806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses with significant quality of life impairments. There is a need to implement outcome-based metrics to evaluate the outcomes of CRS treatment with endoscopic sinus surgery or biologics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to understand Canadian otolaryngologists' opinions on patient-related outcome measures (PROM) for CRS and identify potential barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative research.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was distributed via the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and direct emailing.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Participants' demographics, practice information, and opinions on PROM were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 346 (23%) Canadian otolaryngologists, 78 responded to the survey (26 rhinology fellowship-trained, 51 non-fellowship-trained, and 1 missing data). Thirty-eight responded that they collect PROM (69% with fellowship-trained, 39% non-fellowship-trained, <i>P</i> = .029). Regarding opinions on PROM, 74% of respondents agreed that it helps patients report their symptoms, 42% agreed that it improves the efficiency of the patient encounter, 54% agreed that it is easy for patients to understand, 62% agreed that it improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes, and 71% disagreed that PROM is not helpful. Fellowship-trained otolaryngologists were 4 times more likely to agree that PROM improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes (<i>P</i> = .014), and no other differences in opinions were significant. The most-frequently-identified barriers to PROM usage were lack of time for 67% of respondents, difficulty integrating into clinical workflow for 64%, and lack of integration into the electronic medical record for 47%. If these barriers were addressed, 86% of respondents said they would use PROM in their practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Despite the low uptake of PROM among otolaryngologists without rhinology fellowship, opinions were generally favorable. We identified barriers that, if addressed, may increase their use in clinical practice. As resource-limited therapies such as biologics become more prevalent in CRS management, PROM may find more applications in shared clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241288806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241288806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses with significant quality of life impairments. There is a need to implement outcome-based metrics to evaluate the outcomes of CRS treatment with endoscopic sinus surgery or biologics.

Objective: We aimed to understand Canadian otolaryngologists' opinions on patient-related outcome measures (PROM) for CRS and identify potential barriers to implementation.

Design: Qualitative research.

Setting and participants: A cross-sectional survey was distributed via the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and direct emailing.

Measures: Participants' demographics, practice information, and opinions on PROM were collected.

Results: Of 346 (23%) Canadian otolaryngologists, 78 responded to the survey (26 rhinology fellowship-trained, 51 non-fellowship-trained, and 1 missing data). Thirty-eight responded that they collect PROM (69% with fellowship-trained, 39% non-fellowship-trained, P = .029). Regarding opinions on PROM, 74% of respondents agreed that it helps patients report their symptoms, 42% agreed that it improves the efficiency of the patient encounter, 54% agreed that it is easy for patients to understand, 62% agreed that it improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes, and 71% disagreed that PROM is not helpful. Fellowship-trained otolaryngologists were 4 times more likely to agree that PROM improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes (P = .014), and no other differences in opinions were significant. The most-frequently-identified barriers to PROM usage were lack of time for 67% of respondents, difficulty integrating into clinical workflow for 64%, and lack of integration into the electronic medical record for 47%. If these barriers were addressed, 86% of respondents said they would use PROM in their practice.

Conclusions and relevance: Despite the low uptake of PROM among otolaryngologists without rhinology fellowship, opinions were generally favorable. We identified barriers that, if addressed, may increase their use in clinical practice. As resource-limited therapies such as biologics become more prevalent in CRS management, PROM may find more applications in shared clinical decision making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估在慢性鼻炎患者的常规临床护理中使用患者报告结果指标的情况:加拿大视角。
重要性:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)是一种常见的副鼻窦炎症性疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。有必要采用基于疗效的指标来评估使用内窥镜鼻窦手术或生物制剂治疗 CRS 的疗效:我们旨在了解加拿大耳鼻喉科医生对 CRS 患者相关疗效指标 (PROM) 的看法,并找出实施的潜在障碍:设计:定性研究:通过加拿大耳鼻咽喉头颈外科协会和直接发送电子邮件的方式进行横断面调查:收集了参与者的人口统计数据、实践信息以及对 PROM 的看法:在 346 名(23%)加拿大耳鼻喉科医生中,78 人对调查做出了回复(26 人接受过鼻科研究员培训,51 人未接受过研究员培训,1 人数据缺失)。38 位回答说他们收集了 PROM(69% 接受过研究员培训,39% 未接受过研究员培训,P = 0.029)。关于对 PROM 的看法,74% 的受访者认为 PROM 有助于患者报告症状,42% 的受访者认为 PROM 提高了患者就诊的效率,54% 的受访者认为 PROM 易于患者理解,62% 的受访者认为 PROM 改善了临床结果的管理和监测,71% 的受访者不同意 PROM 没有帮助。接受过研究员培训的耳鼻喉科医生同意 PROM 可改善管理和临床结果监测的比例是其他医生的 4 倍(P = .014),其他意见差异无显著性。67%的受访者认为使用 PROM 最常见的障碍是缺乏时间,64%的受访者认为难以融入临床工作流程,47%的受访者认为无法与电子病历整合。如果这些障碍得到解决,86% 的受访者表示他们会在实践中使用 PROM:尽管没有鼻科研究经历的耳鼻喉科医生对 PROM 的使用率较低,但他们的意见普遍是好的。我们发现了一些障碍,这些障碍如果得到解决,可能会提高其在临床实践中的使用率。随着生物制剂等资源有限的疗法在 CRS 管理中越来越普遍,PROM 可能会在共同临床决策中得到更多应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
期刊最新文献
A Descriptive Study of Quality of Life Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Central Vestibular Dysfunction in Head Injury. Does Managing Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Improve Their Depression Score? Prospective Study. IGF-1 Mediated Neuroprotective Effects of Olfactory-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Auditory Hair Cells. Potential Application of Hydrops MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1