The Effect of Different Concentrations of Epinephrine in Otoendoscopic Surgery on Surgical Field Clarity: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/19160216241288811
Wenying Shu, Tingting Jin, Jinya Shi, Jingjie Li, Zhaoyan Wang
{"title":"The Effect of Different Concentrations of Epinephrine in Otoendoscopic Surgery on Surgical Field Clarity: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study.","authors":"Wenying Shu, Tingting Jin, Jinya Shi, Jingjie Li, Zhaoyan Wang","doi":"10.1177/19160216241288811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>At present, there is no consensus on the concentration of epinephrine/physiological saline for subcutaneous injection into external auditory canal (EAC) under general anesthesia in otoendoscopic surgery. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) research is needed to provide reference, as this concentration can provide satisfactory surgical field clarity while maintaining patients' hemodynamic stability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparison of the effect of subcutaneous injection of different concentrations of epinephrine/physiological saline into EAC under general anesthesia in otoendoscopic surgery on surgical field clarity and hemodynamics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This double-blind, RCT study was about the effect of topical epinephrine injection in otoendoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This study included 168 patients conformed to the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive different concentrations of epinephrine/physiological saline injection (1:5000, 1:10,000, 1:20,000, or 1:40,000) into the junction of bone and cartilage at posterior wall of EAC during surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Surgical field clarity was assessed with surgical field clarity grading scale and tympanic membrane flap flipping time. Hemodynamic changes were monitored by clinical parameters of blood pressure, heart rate, and ST segment of ECG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically-significant differences in surgical field clarity grade (<i>P</i> = .577) and tympanic membrane flap flipping time (<i>P</i> = .490) among 4 concentration groups. Epinephrine injection did cause an increase in hemodynamic parameters when compared with baseline (<i>P</i> < .05). Compared with the relatively-lower concentration groups (1:20,000 and 1:40,000), the relatively-higher concentration groups (1:5000 and 1:10,000) had more significant and long-lasting effect until 30 minutes after injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Four concentration groups of topical epinephrine injection in otoendoscopic surgery have the same effect on surgical field clarity. For the stability of patients' hemodynamics, we would prefer to recommend the use of concentrations with minimal impact on hemodynamics, ranging from 1:20,000 to 1:40,000.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry-China: ChiCTRI1800016647.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241288811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241288811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: At present, there is no consensus on the concentration of epinephrine/physiological saline for subcutaneous injection into external auditory canal (EAC) under general anesthesia in otoendoscopic surgery. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) research is needed to provide reference, as this concentration can provide satisfactory surgical field clarity while maintaining patients' hemodynamic stability.

Objective: Comparison of the effect of subcutaneous injection of different concentrations of epinephrine/physiological saline into EAC under general anesthesia in otoendoscopic surgery on surgical field clarity and hemodynamics.

Design: This double-blind, RCT study was about the effect of topical epinephrine injection in otoendoscopic surgery.

Setting: This study was conducted at a single institution.

Participants: This study included 168 patients conformed to the inclusion criteria.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive different concentrations of epinephrine/physiological saline injection (1:5000, 1:10,000, 1:20,000, or 1:40,000) into the junction of bone and cartilage at posterior wall of EAC during surgery.

Main outcome measures: Surgical field clarity was assessed with surgical field clarity grading scale and tympanic membrane flap flipping time. Hemodynamic changes were monitored by clinical parameters of blood pressure, heart rate, and ST segment of ECG.

Results: There were no statistically-significant differences in surgical field clarity grade (P = .577) and tympanic membrane flap flipping time (P = .490) among 4 concentration groups. Epinephrine injection did cause an increase in hemodynamic parameters when compared with baseline (P < .05). Compared with the relatively-lower concentration groups (1:20,000 and 1:40,000), the relatively-higher concentration groups (1:5000 and 1:10,000) had more significant and long-lasting effect until 30 minutes after injection.

Conclusions and relevance: Four concentration groups of topical epinephrine injection in otoendoscopic surgery have the same effect on surgical field clarity. For the stability of patients' hemodynamics, we would prefer to recommend the use of concentrations with minimal impact on hemodynamics, ranging from 1:20,000 to 1:40,000.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-China: ChiCTRI1800016647.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜手术中不同浓度的肾上腺素对手术视野清晰度的影响:一项双盲随机研究。
重要性:目前,关于外耳道镜手术全身麻醉下皮下注射肾上腺素/生理盐水的浓度尚未达成共识。需要进行随机对照试验(RCT)研究以提供参考,因为该浓度可在保持患者血流动力学稳定的同时提供令人满意的手术视野清晰度:比较眼内镜手术全身麻醉下皮下注射不同浓度肾上腺素/生理盐水对手术视野清晰度和血流动力学的影响:这项双盲 RCT 研究是关于在眼内镜手术中局部注射肾上腺素的效果:研究在一家机构进行:本研究纳入了 168 名符合纳入标准的患者:患者随机接受不同浓度的肾上腺素/生理盐水注射(1:5000、1:10000、1:20000或1:40000),注射部位为EAC后壁骨与软骨交界处:用手术视野清晰度分级表和鼓膜瓣翻转时间评估手术视野清晰度。通过血压、心率和心电图 ST 段等临床参数监测血流动力学变化:4个浓度组的手术视野清晰度分级(P = .577)和鼓膜瓣翻转时间(P = .490)差异无统计学意义。与基线相比,注射肾上腺素确实会导致血液动力学参数升高(P 结论和相关性:在口腔内窥镜手术中局部注射肾上腺素的四个浓度组对手术视野清晰度的影响相同。为了患者血液动力学的稳定,我们建议使用对血液动力学影响最小的浓度,即 1:20,000 至 1:40,000:试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTRI1800016647。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
期刊最新文献
A Descriptive Study of Quality of Life Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Central Vestibular Dysfunction in Head Injury. Does Managing Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Improve Their Depression Score? Prospective Study. IGF-1 Mediated Neuroprotective Effects of Olfactory-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Auditory Hair Cells. Potential Application of Hydrops MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1