A 14-year retrospective of HER2  + metastatic breast cancer treatment at one comprehensive cancer center: Impact of the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and trastuzumab-emtansine sequence versus trastuzumab on overall survival.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1177/10781552241289923
V Lepage, J Clarenne, B Fulbert, F Slimano, C Jouannaud, D Parent
{"title":"A 14-year retrospective of HER2  + metastatic breast cancer treatment at one comprehensive cancer center: Impact of the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and trastuzumab-emtansine sequence versus trastuzumab on overall survival.","authors":"V Lepage, J Clarenne, B Fulbert, F Slimano, C Jouannaud, D Parent","doi":"10.1177/10781552241289923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Monoclonal antibodies represent a significant improvement in the treatment of the HER2 + metastatic cancer, which is associated with a worse prognosis. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) data in patients treated with trastuzumab + pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in the second line of metastatic treatment (Arm A) versus patients treated with trastuzumab alone (Arm B). Progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line metastatic patients was also compared in both arms. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center retrospective study included patients from February 2008 to August 2022. OS and PFS of both arms were described and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and CHIMIO prescribing software. <b>Results:</b> The total duration of metastatic treatment of the 82 patients was significantly longer in the arm A (43.2 ± 28 months vs 33.6 ± 28.9 months), as was the median time to death (59 vs 52 months). The OS data showed a significant reduction in the risk of death in the arm A (Hazard Ratio = 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval [0.37-0.94]; p = 0.02). No difference was shown for PFS. <b>Conclusion:</b> The trastuzumab/pertuzumab/T-DM1 combination showed a significant improvement in OS. Our results are in line with the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA studies, but long-term responders in the arm A may have impacted our results. The absence of difference in term of PFS in first metastatic line may be explained by a selection bias, as patients in the arm A potentially have more aggressive forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241289923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241289923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies represent a significant improvement in the treatment of the HER2 + metastatic cancer, which is associated with a worse prognosis. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) data in patients treated with trastuzumab + pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in the second line of metastatic treatment (Arm A) versus patients treated with trastuzumab alone (Arm B). Progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line metastatic patients was also compared in both arms. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients from February 2008 to August 2022. OS and PFS of both arms were described and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and CHIMIO prescribing software. Results: The total duration of metastatic treatment of the 82 patients was significantly longer in the arm A (43.2 ± 28 months vs 33.6 ± 28.9 months), as was the median time to death (59 vs 52 months). The OS data showed a significant reduction in the risk of death in the arm A (Hazard Ratio = 0.59; 95% Confidence Interval [0.37-0.94]; p = 0.02). No difference was shown for PFS. Conclusion: The trastuzumab/pertuzumab/T-DM1 combination showed a significant improvement in OS. Our results are in line with the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA studies, but long-term responders in the arm A may have impacted our results. The absence of difference in term of PFS in first metastatic line may be explained by a selection bias, as patients in the arm A potentially have more aggressive forms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一家综合癌症中心对 HER2 + 转移性乳腺癌治疗的 14 年回顾性研究:曲妥珠单抗/哌妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗-依单抗序列与曲妥珠单抗对总生存期的影响。
简介单克隆抗体是治疗HER2+转移性癌症的一大进步,而HER2+转移性癌症的预后较差。本研究的目的是比较曲妥珠单抗+百妥珠单抗(pertuzumab)和曲妥珠单抗-依单抗(T-DM1)二线转移治疗(A组)与单用曲妥珠单抗治疗(B组)患者的总生存期(OS)数据。两组一线转移患者的无进展生存期(PFS)也进行了比较。研究方法这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2008年2月至2022年8月的患者。采用卡普兰-梅耶法对两组患者的OS和PFS进行了描述和估算。数据来自电子病历和CHIMIO处方软件。结果A 组 82 名患者的转移性治疗总持续时间明显更长(43.2 ± 28 个月 vs 33.6 ± 28.9 个月),中位死亡时间也更长(59 个月 vs 52 个月)。OS 数据显示,A 组的死亡风险明显降低(危险比 = 0.59;95% 置信区间 [0.37-0.94];p = 0.02)。PFS方面没有差异。结论曲妥珠单抗/哌妥珠单抗/T-DM1联合治疗显著改善了患者的OS。我们的结果与CLEOPATRA和EMILIA研究一致,但A组中的长期应答者可能会影响我们的结果。一线转移患者的 PFS 无差异可能是由于选择偏差造成的,因为 A 组患者的病情可能更具侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic surface contamination in hospitals: Current practices, challenges and perspectives. Cytomegalovirus viremia and hepatitis B reactivation in patient with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with pralsetinib. Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital. An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol. Hospital pharmacists' perceived competence in providing care to oncology patients - (HoPP-CoP2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1