Podium to Publication: An Analysis of Papers Presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) Congress (2009-19).

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161986
Ayman Goneidy, Alexander Macdonald, Mark Davenport
{"title":"Podium to Publication: An Analysis of Papers Presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) Congress (2009-19).","authors":"Ayman Goneidy, Alexander Macdonald, Mark Davenport","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) annual congress is an opportunity to present clinical and scientific data that may influence future practice. The presentation of the Abstract is but the first step towards definitive publication in the medical literature. Our aim was to review what the success rate has been from previous congresses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Abstracts were reviewed for the 11-year-period 2009 to 2019. A MEDLINE search using keywords from title and authors' names was used to identify subsequent publication. Comparison with a previous dataset [1] (1999-2008) was also carried out. Linear data were compared for trend using Mann-Whitney-U. P ≤ 0.05 was accepted as significant. Data were expressed as median (interquartile range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1061 abstracts were presented orally with 555 (52.3%) subsequently published. The number per year was 90 (81-106) compared to 81 (74-79) in 1999-2008 (P = 0.25), although with a higher number actually published thereafter [45 (32-54)% vs. 30 (27-35)%; P = 0.0003)]. Publication occurred in a wide range of journals (n = 99), with most being in the Journal of Pediatric Surgery (n = 251), albeit with a smaller proportion (49% vs. 69% formerly, P < 0.05). Overall, UK institutions contributed 52.6% (n = 558) of abstracts with 240 (43%) of them subsequently published at 19 (17-29)/year. The proportion of UK presentations had increased from 43% formerly (P = 0.016). Most UK presentations originated from institutions within London [41% vs. 45% formerly, P = 0.04]. There was a wide range of abstracts from institutions from outside of the UK (n = 49) with 38 (26-51) abstracts accepted each year and of these 62.4% were subsequently published at 20 (15-36)/year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There has been an increase in abstracts accepted for presentation over the period, together with a higher proportion actually reaching publication. A strong international contribution was noted which has also been maintained. London remains the primary source of abstracts and publications from within the UK, although there was a higher proportion from other UK centres noted over this period. Reference [1] Macdonald AL, Parsons C, Davenport M. Outcome of abstracts presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons congresses (1999-2008). J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.09.043.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) annual congress is an opportunity to present clinical and scientific data that may influence future practice. The presentation of the Abstract is but the first step towards definitive publication in the medical literature. Our aim was to review what the success rate has been from previous congresses.

Methods: Abstracts were reviewed for the 11-year-period 2009 to 2019. A MEDLINE search using keywords from title and authors' names was used to identify subsequent publication. Comparison with a previous dataset [1] (1999-2008) was also carried out. Linear data were compared for trend using Mann-Whitney-U. P ≤ 0.05 was accepted as significant. Data were expressed as median (interquartile range).

Results: 1061 abstracts were presented orally with 555 (52.3%) subsequently published. The number per year was 90 (81-106) compared to 81 (74-79) in 1999-2008 (P = 0.25), although with a higher number actually published thereafter [45 (32-54)% vs. 30 (27-35)%; P = 0.0003)]. Publication occurred in a wide range of journals (n = 99), with most being in the Journal of Pediatric Surgery (n = 251), albeit with a smaller proportion (49% vs. 69% formerly, P < 0.05). Overall, UK institutions contributed 52.6% (n = 558) of abstracts with 240 (43%) of them subsequently published at 19 (17-29)/year. The proportion of UK presentations had increased from 43% formerly (P = 0.016). Most UK presentations originated from institutions within London [41% vs. 45% formerly, P = 0.04]. There was a wide range of abstracts from institutions from outside of the UK (n = 49) with 38 (26-51) abstracts accepted each year and of these 62.4% were subsequently published at 20 (15-36)/year.

Conclusion: There has been an increase in abstracts accepted for presentation over the period, together with a higher proportion actually reaching publication. A strong international contribution was noted which has also been maintained. London remains the primary source of abstracts and publications from within the UK, although there was a higher proportion from other UK centres noted over this period. Reference [1] Macdonald AL, Parsons C, Davenport M. Outcome of abstracts presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons congresses (1999-2008). J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.09.043.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从讲台到出版物:英国儿科外科医生协会(BAPS)大会论文分析(2009-19)。
背景:英国儿科外科医生协会(BAPS)年会是一个展示可能影响未来实践的临床和科学数据的机会。提交摘要只是在医学文献中明确发表的第一步。我们的目的是回顾历届大会的成功率:我们对 2009 年至 2019 年这 11 年间的论文摘要进行了审查。使用标题和作者姓名中的关键词进行 MEDLINE 搜索,以确定后续发表的论文。同时还与之前的数据集[1](1999-2008 年)进行了比较。使用 Mann-Whitney-U 对线性数据进行趋势比较。P≤0.05为差异显著。数据以中位数(四分位数间距)表示:结果:共口头提交了 1061 篇摘要,其中 555 篇(52.3%)随后发表。每年的论文摘要数量为 90 (81-106) 篇,1999-2008 年为 81 (74-79) 篇 (P = 0.25),但此后实际发表的论文摘要数量更多 [45 (32-54)% vs. 30 (27-35)%; P = 0.0003]。论文发表在多种期刊上(n = 99),其中大部分发表在《小儿外科杂志》上(n = 251),但比例较低(49% 对 69%,P 结论:论文发表在多种期刊上(n = 99),其中大部分发表在《小儿外科杂志》上(n = 251):在此期间,被接受发表的摘要数量有所增加,实际发表的比例也有所提高。国际方面的贡献也很大,这一点也得到了保持。伦敦仍然是英国国内论文摘要和出版物的主要来源地,但在此期间,来自英国其他中心的论文摘要和出版物的比例也有所提高。参考文献 [1] Macdonald AL, Parsons C, Davenport M. 英国儿科外科医生协会大会(1999-2008 年)摘要成果。J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.09.043.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Unnecessary Scans Lead to Unnecessary Re-scans: Evaluating Clinical Management of Low and Intermediate Risk Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injuries. Non-operative Versus Operative Management of Perianal Abscess in Infants: A 10-year Retrospective Study at Two Centres in the United Kingdom. Malignant Hyperthermia in Pediatric Surgery: Essential Awareness and Crisis Management. Intraureteral Instillation of Indocyanine Green for Intraoperative Identification of the Ureter During Laparoscopy. Congenital Tracheal Stenosis With Complete Cartilage Rings: Proposal of A Multidisciplinary and Tailored Surgical Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1