Computer-assisted navigation of anterior odontoid screw fixation for type II odontoid fracture: case report and practical positioning technique.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-23 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-46
Davin C Gong, Mohamed Yassin, Rakesh D Patel, Osama N Kashlan, Ilyas Aleem
{"title":"Computer-assisted navigation of anterior odontoid screw fixation for type II odontoid fracture: case report and practical positioning technique.","authors":"Davin C Gong, Mohamed Yassin, Rakesh D Patel, Osama N Kashlan, Ilyas Aleem","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Odontoid process fractures, particularly type 2 fractures, pose significant treatment challenges due to their high rates of nonunion. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) is traditionally performed using percutaneous methods with biplanar fluoroscopy. Computer-assisted navigation has emerged as a promising tool to enhance surgical precision, but its application in AOSF is rarely utilized. Cervical spine stability during AOSF is crucial for optimal outcomes and navigational accuracy.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 64-year-old male presents with a displaced type 2 odontoid fracture following a fall. The fracture was treated with AOSF with the assistance of computed tomography (CT) navigation. A practical positioning technique employing a pressure infusion bag was introduced to stabilize cervical motion during surgery. This technique allows for precise instrumentation while minimizing the risk of navigational inaccuracy. Intraoperative imaging confirmed excellent fracture reduction and screw placement, facilitating a favorable surgical outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT navigation for AOSF is not yet widely adopted for the treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures due to inherent risks of fracture displacement, navigational inaccuracy, and iatrogenic injury. The off-label use of a pressure infusion bag for cervical stabilization offers a practical and cost-effective solution to enhance surgical precision. While further research is needed to compare the efficacy and radiation exposure of navigation-guided versus fluoroscopy-assisted AOSF, our report demonstrates that a safe and optimal outcome can be achieved using navigation-guided techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"590-596"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Odontoid process fractures, particularly type 2 fractures, pose significant treatment challenges due to their high rates of nonunion. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) is traditionally performed using percutaneous methods with biplanar fluoroscopy. Computer-assisted navigation has emerged as a promising tool to enhance surgical precision, but its application in AOSF is rarely utilized. Cervical spine stability during AOSF is crucial for optimal outcomes and navigational accuracy.

Case description: A 64-year-old male presents with a displaced type 2 odontoid fracture following a fall. The fracture was treated with AOSF with the assistance of computed tomography (CT) navigation. A practical positioning technique employing a pressure infusion bag was introduced to stabilize cervical motion during surgery. This technique allows for precise instrumentation while minimizing the risk of navigational inaccuracy. Intraoperative imaging confirmed excellent fracture reduction and screw placement, facilitating a favorable surgical outcome.

Conclusions: CT navigation for AOSF is not yet widely adopted for the treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures due to inherent risks of fracture displacement, navigational inaccuracy, and iatrogenic injury. The off-label use of a pressure infusion bag for cervical stabilization offers a practical and cost-effective solution to enhance surgical precision. While further research is needed to compare the efficacy and radiation exposure of navigation-guided versus fluoroscopy-assisted AOSF, our report demonstrates that a safe and optimal outcome can be achieved using navigation-guided techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机辅助蝶骨前螺钉固定术治疗 II 型蝶骨骨折:病例报告和实用定位技术。
背景:蝶骨突骨折,尤其是 2 型骨折,由于其不愈合率高,给治疗带来了巨大挑战。寰枢椎前螺钉固定术(AOSF)传统上采用双平面透视经皮方法。计算机辅助导航是一种很有前途的提高手术精确度的工具,但在 AOSF 中的应用却很少。AOSF 过程中颈椎的稳定性对于获得最佳疗效和导航准确性至关重要:一名 64 岁的男性因摔倒导致 2 型蝶骨骨折移位。在计算机断层扫描(CT)导航的辅助下,该骨折接受了 AOSF 治疗。手术中采用了一种实用的定位技术,即使用压力输液袋来稳定颈椎运动。这种技术既能进行精确的器械操作,又能将导航不准确的风险降至最低。术中成像证实了良好的骨折复位和螺钉置入效果,促进了良好的手术效果:结论:由于骨折移位、导航不准确和先天性损伤等固有风险,CT导航AOSF尚未被广泛用于治疗2型蝶骨骨折。在标签外使用压力输液袋进行颈椎稳定为提高手术精确度提供了一种实用且经济的解决方案。虽然还需要进一步的研究来比较导航引导与透视辅助 AOSF 的疗效和辐射暴露,但我们的报告表明,使用导航引导技术可以获得最佳的安全结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1