Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-23 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-34
Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland
{"title":"Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.","authors":"Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 <i>vs.</i> 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% <i>vs.</i> 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% <i>vs.</i> 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.

Methods: A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.

Results: One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 vs. 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% vs. 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% vs. 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% vs. 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% vs. 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% vs. 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% vs. 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% vs. 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与仰卧位相比,侧卧位从前方暴露 L4-5 椎间盘可保持安全性。
背景:腹膜后腰椎前方暴露术传统上是在仰卧位(SUP)下进行的,以进入L4-L5和L5-S1椎间盘间隙,因为侧卧位手术可能不安全。然而,随着侧卧位单体位手术的发展,人们主张在侧卧位(LAT)下进行L4-5椎间盘前方入路手术。虽然L5-S1侧卧位入路已被详细描述,但还没有关于L4-5侧卧位前方入路的系列文章发表。本研究旨在评估与 SUP 相比,LAT 下 L4-5 椎间盘水平腰椎前路暴露的安全性:多中心回顾性研究根据患者的体位将接受前路腹膜后腰椎暴露涉及L4-5椎间盘水平的患者分为:(I)LAT或(II)SUP:结果:共纳入 140 例患者,其中 65 例为 LAT 患者,75 例为 SUP 患者。暴露了 238 个前椎水平,其中 113 个在侧卧位进行,125 个在仰卧位进行。平均前路融合水平相似(1.74 对 1.67 水平,P=0.37)。接受额外侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)(21.50% 对 0.00%,Pvs. 6.70%,P=0.01)和计划分期手术(21.50% 对 6.70%,P=0.01)的 LAT 患者显著增多。术中并发症发生率相似(3.10% vs. 4.00%,P=0.77),包括相似的血管损伤率(1.50% vs. 0.00%,P=0.28)和无内脏损伤。LAT 组的术后并发症(15.40% 对 38.70%,P=0.002)明显较低,但两组的主要并发症(6.20% 对 13.30%,P=0.16)相似。发生术后回肠梗阻的 LAT 患者较少(0.00% 对 6.70%,P=0.03)。两组患者在30天内(3.10% vs. 6.70%,P=0.33)和90天内(3.10% vs. 10.70%,P=0.09)的再次手术率相似:结论:尽管侧卧位的病例复杂程度更高,但与仰卧位相比,LAT腰椎前路暴露L4-5椎间盘是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1