Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland
{"title":"Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.","authors":"Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 <i>vs.</i> 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% <i>vs.</i> 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% <i>vs.</i> 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.
Methods: A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.
Results: One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 vs. 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% vs. 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% vs. 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% vs. 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% vs. 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% vs. 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% vs. 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% vs. 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.