Management and treatment algorithm of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery: systematic review.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-23 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.21037/jss-23-32
Luis Felipe Colón, Lauren Barber, Ellen Soffin, Todd J Albert, Yoshihiro Katsuura
{"title":"Management and treatment algorithm of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery: systematic review.","authors":"Luis Felipe Colón, Lauren Barber, Ellen Soffin, Todd J Albert, Yoshihiro Katsuura","doi":"10.21037/jss-23-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway-related complications are rare after cervical spine surgery but can be devastating and compromise a successful outcome. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the management of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) and propose a treatment algorithm for approaching the patient with a compromised airway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed and adapted for use in other databases, including the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Library Health Technology Assessment Database, Embase, and the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 papers received a full text review. Thirty-seven studies were categorized as \"management\" and included. An additional four references were extracted from other references for a total of 41 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the available evidence on airway compromise after ACSS is level III or IV. Similarly, most available evidence on the management of acute airway complications comes from case reports or anecdotal publications. There are currently no methods in place to stratify the risk of airway complications in patients undergoing these guidelines on the management of these complications when they occur. This review is focused on practice, including management of such complications with a proposed treatment algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"562-575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-23-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway-related complications are rare after cervical spine surgery but can be devastating and compromise a successful outcome. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the management of airway complications after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) and propose a treatment algorithm for approaching the patient with a compromised airway.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and adapted for use in other databases, including the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Library Health Technology Assessment Database, Embase, and the National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database.

Results: A total of 117 papers received a full text review. Thirty-seven studies were categorized as "management" and included. An additional four references were extracted from other references for a total of 41 studies.

Conclusions: Most of the available evidence on airway compromise after ACSS is level III or IV. Similarly, most available evidence on the management of acute airway complications comes from case reports or anecdotal publications. There are currently no methods in place to stratify the risk of airway complications in patients undergoing these guidelines on the management of these complications when they occur. This review is focused on practice, including management of such complications with a proposed treatment algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎前路手术后气道并发症的管理和治疗算法:系统综述。
背景:颈椎手术后出现气道相关并发症的情况很少见,但可能会造成严重后果,影响手术的成功率。本系统综述旨在概述颈椎前路手术(ACSS)后气道并发症的处理方法,并提出处理气道受损患者的治疗算法:方法:在PubMed上进行文献检索,并在其他数据库中进行调整,包括Cochrane对照试验注册、Cochrane图书馆健康技术评估数据库、Embase和国家卫生服务系统(NHS)经济评估数据库:共有 117 篇论文接受了全文审阅。有 37 项研究被归类为 "管理 "研究并纳入其中。另外还从其他参考文献中提取了 4 篇参考文献,共计 41 项研究:结论:关于 ACSS 后气道损伤的现有证据大多为 III 级或 IV 级。同样,关于急性气道并发症处理的现有证据大多来自病例报告或轶事出版物。目前还没有方法对接受这些指南治疗的患者气道并发症的风险进行分层,以便在并发症发生时进行处理。本综述侧重于实践,包括对此类并发症的处理和建议的治疗算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1