Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion using a dual-dimension expandable cage: preliminary results of a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Q1 Medicine Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-23 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-29
Chuan-Ching Huang, Kyle R Brena, Troy Q Tabarestani, Anas Bardeesi, Mounica Paturu, Holley Spears, Ernest E Braxton, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
{"title":"Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion using a dual-dimension expandable cage: preliminary results of a multi-institutional retrospective study.","authors":"Chuan-Ching Huang, Kyle R Brena, Troy Q Tabarestani, Anas Bardeesi, Mounica Paturu, Holley Spears, Ernest E Braxton, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an emerging technique that offers the advantages of being safe, enabling decompression, and facilitating patient recovery. An innovative cage that expands in two dimensions has been introduced to restore segmental lordosis and disc height while minimizing the risk of cage subsidence. This study aimed to report our surgical technique of trans-facet LIF utilizing the innovative cag and to report the early clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of patients who underwent trans-facet LIF with dual-dimension expandable cages from two institutions: Duke University Hospital and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery. The analysis covered patient demographics, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain, surgical data, complications, and radiographic parameters. Clinical outcomes were compared between pre- and one year post-operation, while radiographic outcomes were compared between pre- and three months post-operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients with a mean age of 61.2 years were included. Seventeen patients (85.0%) had spondylolisthesis, and L4/5 (68.2%) was the most common pathology level. Twelve patients (60.0%) underwent awake surgery, and the mean operative time was 164.5±36.1 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 64.0±39.5 mL and a hospital stay of 1.75±1.2 days. Four patients (20.0%) experienced cage subsidence; however, none required additional surgery. The VAS score significantly improved from a preoperative average of 7.3±2.7 to 2.6±1.6 one year post-operation (P=0.02). The ODI score also showed a significant decrease, from 48.7±22.9 preoperatively to 16.4±11.1 one year postoperatively (P=0.03). Notably, 80% and 83.3% of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference in VAS and ODI scores, respectively. The degree of spondylolisthesis was significantly reduced from a median of 5.9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively (P<0.001). Additionally, both anterior and posterior disc heights significantly increased after surgery, from 9.8±4.7 to 15.1±2.6 mm (anterior) and from 4.9±3.3 to 10.5±2.2 mm (posterior) (P<0.001 for both). The mean segmental lordosis increased by 2.9 degrees and was associated with cage height (P=0.03), while spinopelvic parameters remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally-invasive trans-facet LIF with dual-dimension expandable cages demonstrates a substantial capacity for spondylolisthesis reduction and disc height restoration, and provides good short-term clinical outcomes. It may be the most appropriate method for deploying this large cage as it allows for a large, unobstructed pathway to the disc. However, future studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes, including the arthrodesis rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"403-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally-invasive trans-facet lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an emerging technique that offers the advantages of being safe, enabling decompression, and facilitating patient recovery. An innovative cage that expands in two dimensions has been introduced to restore segmental lordosis and disc height while minimizing the risk of cage subsidence. This study aimed to report our surgical technique of trans-facet LIF utilizing the innovative cag and to report the early clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of patients who underwent trans-facet LIF with dual-dimension expandable cages from two institutions: Duke University Hospital and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery. The analysis covered patient demographics, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain, surgical data, complications, and radiographic parameters. Clinical outcomes were compared between pre- and one year post-operation, while radiographic outcomes were compared between pre- and three months post-operation.

Results: Twenty patients with a mean age of 61.2 years were included. Seventeen patients (85.0%) had spondylolisthesis, and L4/5 (68.2%) was the most common pathology level. Twelve patients (60.0%) underwent awake surgery, and the mean operative time was 164.5±36.1 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 64.0±39.5 mL and a hospital stay of 1.75±1.2 days. Four patients (20.0%) experienced cage subsidence; however, none required additional surgery. The VAS score significantly improved from a preoperative average of 7.3±2.7 to 2.6±1.6 one year post-operation (P=0.02). The ODI score also showed a significant decrease, from 48.7±22.9 preoperatively to 16.4±11.1 one year postoperatively (P=0.03). Notably, 80% and 83.3% of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference in VAS and ODI scores, respectively. The degree of spondylolisthesis was significantly reduced from a median of 5.9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively (P<0.001). Additionally, both anterior and posterior disc heights significantly increased after surgery, from 9.8±4.7 to 15.1±2.6 mm (anterior) and from 4.9±3.3 to 10.5±2.2 mm (posterior) (P<0.001 for both). The mean segmental lordosis increased by 2.9 degrees and was associated with cage height (P=0.03), while spinopelvic parameters remained unchanged.

Conclusions: Minimally-invasive trans-facet LIF with dual-dimension expandable cages demonstrates a substantial capacity for spondylolisthesis reduction and disc height restoration, and provides good short-term clinical outcomes. It may be the most appropriate method for deploying this large cage as it allows for a large, unobstructed pathway to the disc. However, future studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes, including the arthrodesis rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用双维度可扩张保持架的微创经髋腰椎椎间融合术:一项多机构回顾性研究的初步结果。
背景:微创经侧腰椎椎间融合术(LIF)是一种新兴技术,具有安全、减压和促进患者康复等优点。创新性的二维扩张椎笼已被引入,以恢复节段前凸和椎间盘高度,同时最大限度地降低椎笼下沉的风险。本研究旨在报告我们利用创新型椎间孔镜经椎体后凸成形术(trans-facet LIF)的手术技巧,并报告其早期临床效果:我们回顾性地查看了两家医院使用双维度可扩张保持架进行经椎间孔 LIF 手术的患者的病历和 X 光片:方法:我们回顾性地查看了两家医院的病历和放射照片,这两家医院分别是杜克大学医院和韦尔-萨米特骨科和神经外科。分析内容包括患者人口统计学、Oswestry 失能指数 (ODI)、背痛视觉模拟量表 (VAS)、手术数据、并发症和放射学参数。临床结果在手术前和手术后一年之间进行比较,放射学结果在手术前和手术后三个月之间进行比较:共纳入 20 名患者,平均年龄为 61.2 岁。17名患者(85.0%)患有脊柱滑脱症,L4/5(68.2%)是最常见的病理级别。12名患者(60.0%)接受了清醒手术,平均手术时间为(164.5±36.1)分钟,估计失血量为(64.0±39.5)毫升,住院时间为(1.75±1.2)天。有四名患者(20.0%)出现了骨笼下陷,但没有人需要再次手术。术后一年,VAS评分从术前的平均7.3±2.7分明显降低到2.6±1.6分(P=0.02)。ODI 评分也有明显下降,从术前的 48.7±22.9 降至术后一年的 16.4±11.1(P=0.03)。值得注意的是,分别有 80% 和 83.3% 的患者达到了 VAS 和 ODI 评分的最小临床意义差异。脊柱滑脱的程度从术前的中位数 5.9 毫米明显降低到术后的 0 毫米(PC 结论:微创经椎体后凸人工关节置换术(trans-facet LIF)与双维可扩张人工关节保持架显示出了减少椎体后凸和恢复椎间盘高度的巨大能力,并提供了良好的短期临床疗效。这可能是部署这种大型保持架的最合适方法,因为它可以为椎间盘提供宽敞、畅通无阻的通道。不过,今后还需要进行研究,以确定长期疗效,包括关节置换率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A comparative cadaveric biomechanical study of bilateral FacetFuse® transfacet pedicle screws versus bilateral or unilateral pedicle screw-rod construct. Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual vs. single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical vs. asymmetrical plate designs. Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions. Blood loss during three column osteotomies: influence on outcomes and mitigation strategies. Bone graft substitutes used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a contemporary systematic review of fusion rates and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1