Relay strip intercropping of soybeans and maize achieves high net ecosystem economic benefits by boosting land output and alleviating greenhouse gas emissions.

IF 3.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1002/jsfa.13968
Zhidan Fu, Ping Chen, Kai Luo, Ping Lin, Yiling Li, Tian Pu, Yuze Li, Yushan Wu, Xiaochun Wang, Wenyu Yang, Taiwen Yong
{"title":"Relay strip intercropping of soybeans and maize achieves high net ecosystem economic benefits by boosting land output and alleviating greenhouse gas emissions.","authors":"Zhidan Fu, Ping Chen, Kai Luo, Ping Lin, Yiling Li, Tian Pu, Yuze Li, Yushan Wu, Xiaochun Wang, Wenyu Yang, Taiwen Yong","doi":"10.1002/jsfa.13968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cereal-legume intercropping provides a solution for achieving global food security, but the mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions and net ecosystem economic benefits of maize-soybean relay intercropping are poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a two-factor experiment to investigate the effects of cropping systems, containing maize-soybean relay intercropping (IMS), monoculture maize (M) and monoculture soybean (S), as well as three nitrogen levels at 0 (N0), 180 (N1), 240 (N2) kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> on crop grain yield, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon stock and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average grain yield of IMS (7.7 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) increased by 28.5% and 242.4% compared with M (6.0 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and S (2.2 t ha<sup>-1</sup>). The land equivalent ratio (LER) of IMS was 2.0, which was mainly contributed by maize (partial LER: 1.2) rather than soybean (partial LER: 0.8). Although the total grain yield of IMS remarkably enhanced by 43.6% and 45.5% in N1 and N2 contrast in N0, the LER was 37.5% and 38.6% lower in N1 and N2 than in N0. The net global warming potential (GWP) of maize and soybean was 11.6% and 1.8% lower in IMS than in the corresponding monoculture, which resulted from a decline in GWP and enhanced soil organic carbon stock rate. Moreover, NEEB was 133.5% higher in IMS (14 032.0 Chinese yuan per year) than in M, mainly resulting from an increase in total economic gains and a decline in GWP cost. A more robust response in yield gain rather than total costs to N inputs of IMS led to 46.8% and 48.3% higher NEEB in N1 and N2 than in N0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maize-soybean relay intercropping with 180 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> application can obtain yield advantages without raising environmental costs, which provides an approach to achieving sustainable agricultural production. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":17725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cereal-legume intercropping provides a solution for achieving global food security, but the mechanism of greenhouse gas emissions and net ecosystem economic benefits of maize-soybean relay intercropping are poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a two-factor experiment to investigate the effects of cropping systems, containing maize-soybean relay intercropping (IMS), monoculture maize (M) and monoculture soybean (S), as well as three nitrogen levels at 0 (N0), 180 (N1), 240 (N2) kg N ha-1 on crop grain yield, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon stock and net ecosystem economic benefit (NEEB).

Results: The average grain yield of IMS (7.7 t ha-1) increased by 28.5% and 242.4% compared with M (6.0 t ha-1) and S (2.2 t ha-1). The land equivalent ratio (LER) of IMS was 2.0, which was mainly contributed by maize (partial LER: 1.2) rather than soybean (partial LER: 0.8). Although the total grain yield of IMS remarkably enhanced by 43.6% and 45.5% in N1 and N2 contrast in N0, the LER was 37.5% and 38.6% lower in N1 and N2 than in N0. The net global warming potential (GWP) of maize and soybean was 11.6% and 1.8% lower in IMS than in the corresponding monoculture, which resulted from a decline in GWP and enhanced soil organic carbon stock rate. Moreover, NEEB was 133.5% higher in IMS (14 032.0 Chinese yuan per year) than in M, mainly resulting from an increase in total economic gains and a decline in GWP cost. A more robust response in yield gain rather than total costs to N inputs of IMS led to 46.8% and 48.3% higher NEEB in N1 and N2 than in N0.

Conclusion: Maize-soybean relay intercropping with 180 kg N ha-1 application can obtain yield advantages without raising environmental costs, which provides an approach to achieving sustainable agricultural production. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大豆和玉米间作套种通过提高土地产出和减少温室气体排放,实现了较高的生态系统经济净效益。
背景:谷物-豆类间作为实现全球粮食安全提供了一种解决方案,但人们对玉米-大豆间作的温室气体排放机制和生态系统净经济效益知之甚少。因此,我们进行了一项双因素试验,研究了玉米-大豆间作套种(IMS)、单作玉米(M)和单作大豆(S)以及 0(N0)、180(N1)、240(N2) kg N ha-1 三种氮素水平的种植系统对作物产量、温室气体排放、土壤碳储量和生态系统净经济效益(NEEB)的影响:IMS 的平均谷物产量(7.7 吨/公顷-1)比 M(6.0 吨/公顷-1)和 S(2.2 吨/公顷-1)分别增加了 28.5%和 242.4%。IMS 的土地当量比为 2.0,主要由玉米(部分土地当量比:1.2)而非大豆(部分土地当量比:0.8)贡献。虽然 IMS 的总产量在 N1 和 N2 比 N0 显著提高了 43.6% 和 45.5%,但 LER 在 N1 和 N2 比 N0 低 37.5% 和 38.6%。玉米和大豆的净全球升温潜能值(GWP)在 IMS 中分别比相应的单一栽培低 11.6% 和 1.8%,这是全球升温潜能值下降和土壤有机碳储量增加的结果。此外,IMS 的净经济效益比 M 高 133.5%(每年 14 032.0 元人民币),这主要是由于总经济收益的增加和全球升温潜能值成本的下降。IMS对氮投入的增产反应比总成本反应更强,导致氮1和氮2的净经济效益分别比氮0高出46.8%和48.3%:结论:玉米-大豆间作套种,每公顷施用 180 千克氮,可在不增加环境成本的情况下获得增产优势,为实现可持续农业生产提供了一种方法。© 2024 化学工业协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
634
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, mini-reviews, perspectives and spotlights in these areas, with particular emphasis on interdisciplinary studies at the agriculture/ food interface. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) is a unique international forum where science meets business on independent, impartial ground. Anyone can join and current Members include consumers, business people, environmentalists, industrialists, farmers, and researchers. The Society offers a chance to share information between sectors as diverse as food and agriculture, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, materials, chemicals, environmental science and safety. As well as organising educational events, SCI awards a number of prestigious honours and scholarships each year, publishes peer-reviewed journals, and provides Members with news from their sectors in the respected magazine, Chemistry & Industry . Originally established in London in 1881 and in New York in 1894, SCI is a registered charity with Members in over 70 countries.
期刊最新文献
Fluorescent nanoparticles from roast duck induce cell damage and physiological dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Effects of catechins, resveratrol, silymarin components and some of their conjugates on xanthine oxidase-catalyzed xanthine and 6-mercaptopurine oxidation. The effect of enzymatic deamidation on the solubility and emulsifying properties of walnut protein isolate. The use of heat-treated whey protein isolate as a natural emulsifier in fat-filled whey powder with a pre-emulsification process. A novel polysaccharide from Macadamia peel: Extraction, purification, structural characterization and antioxidant activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1