Pregnancy Anxiety and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among a Diverse U.S. Cohort.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0453
Cheng-Tzu Hsieh, Lu Zhang, Jessica Britt, Skye Shodahl, Amy Crockett, Liwei Chen
{"title":"Pregnancy Anxiety and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Among a Diverse U.S. Cohort.","authors":"Cheng-Tzu Hsieh, Lu Zhang, Jessica Britt, Skye Shodahl, Amy Crockett, Liwei Chen","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Pregnancy anxiety increases the risk of preterm birth but less is known about the impacts on glucose intolerance during pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study examined the relationship between pregnancy anxiety and the risk of GDM in a prospective cohort Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) study of racially diverse pregnant women in the United States. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a prospective analysis among racially diverse pregnant women in the United States who enrolled in the CRADLE study. Pregnancy anxiety was assessed twice using the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS): the baseline survey at <20 gestational weeks (GW) and the second survey at >30 GW. GDM was screened at 24-30 GW and diagnosed based on the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The associations of baseline PSAS score (>9 [median] versus ≤9) and PSAS score change with GDM risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions with adjustment for potential confounders. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among a total of 2,310 women (40.74% Black, 20.91% Hispanic), 154 (6.67%) developed GDM. No association was found between baseline PSAS and GDM (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.42) after adjusting for confounders. Individuals with an increased PSAS during pregnancy had 52% higher GDM risk (adjusted OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04-2.23) compared with those with no change or decreased scores. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pregnant individuals who increased their pregnancy-specific anxiety level during pregnancy had a higher risk of developing GDM. <b>Clinical Trials Registration Identifier:</b> NCT02640638. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov December 29, 2015. Study recruitment began February 24, 2016. URL of ClincialTrials.gov registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02640638?term=NCT02640638&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy anxiety increases the risk of preterm birth but less is known about the impacts on glucose intolerance during pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study examined the relationship between pregnancy anxiety and the risk of GDM in a prospective cohort Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE) study of racially diverse pregnant women in the United States. Methods: This is a prospective analysis among racially diverse pregnant women in the United States who enrolled in the CRADLE study. Pregnancy anxiety was assessed twice using the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Scale (PSAS): the baseline survey at <20 gestational weeks (GW) and the second survey at >30 GW. GDM was screened at 24-30 GW and diagnosed based on the Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The associations of baseline PSAS score (>9 [median] versus ≤9) and PSAS score change with GDM risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regressions with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Among a total of 2,310 women (40.74% Black, 20.91% Hispanic), 154 (6.67%) developed GDM. No association was found between baseline PSAS and GDM (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.42) after adjusting for confounders. Individuals with an increased PSAS during pregnancy had 52% higher GDM risk (adjusted OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04-2.23) compared with those with no change or decreased scores. Conclusions: Pregnant individuals who increased their pregnancy-specific anxiety level during pregnancy had a higher risk of developing GDM. Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02640638. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov December 29, 2015. Study recruitment began February 24, 2016. URL of ClincialTrials.gov registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02640638?term=NCT02640638&draw=2&rank=1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国不同群体中的孕期焦虑与妊娠糖尿病风险。
背景:孕期焦虑会增加早产的风险,但对孕期葡萄糖不耐受(如妊娠糖尿病(GDM))的影响却知之甚少。本研究在一项针对美国不同种族孕妇的前瞻性队列中心化和种族差异(CRADLE)研究中考察了妊娠焦虑与 GDM 风险之间的关系。研究方法:这是对参加 CRADLE 研究的美国不同种族孕妇进行的前瞻性分析。使用妊娠焦虑量表(PSAS)对妊娠焦虑进行了两次评估:30 GW 时的基线调查。在怀孕 24-30 周时对 GDM 进行筛查,并根据 Carpenter 和 Coustan 标准进行诊断。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,使用多变量逻辑回归估算了基线 PSAS 评分(>9 [中位数] 与 ≤9)和 PSAS 评分变化与 GDM 风险之间的关系。结果在 2310 名妇女(40.74% 为黑人,20.91% 为西班牙裔)中,有 154 人(6.67%)患上了 GDM。在对混杂因素进行调整后,基线 PSAS 与 GDM 之间没有关联(调整后的几率比 [OR]:0.99;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.70-1.42)。与没有变化或评分下降的人相比,孕期 PSAS 增加的人患 GDM 的风险高出 52%(调整后 OR:1.52;95% 置信区间:1.04-2.23)。结论怀孕期间妊娠特异性焦虑水平升高的孕妇患 GDM 的风险更高。临床试验注册标识符:NCT02640638。2015年12月29日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册。研究招募始于 2016 年 2 月 24 日。ClinicalTrials.gov注册网站网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02640638?term=NCT02640638&draw=2&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences Regarding Communication About Maternal Vaccination: Qualitative Findings from Non-Hispanic Black Pregnant People. Oncofertility Research: A Review of the Literature. Self-Management Interventions for Black Women at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Gender Differences in "Making Weight" Behaviors Among U.S. Iraq and Afghan War Veterans: Implications for Future Health. Maternal Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension-Quality Metric or Call for Action?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1