Comparison of Dynamic and Static Compliance in Two Ventilation Methods with Tidal Volume of 6 and 10 ml/kg: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q2 Medicine Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.73
Mehryar Taghavi Gilani, Alireza Bameshki, Majid Razavi, Ghorbanali Sadeghzadeh
{"title":"Comparison of Dynamic and Static Compliance in Two Ventilation Methods with Tidal Volume of 6 and 10 ml/kg: Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mehryar Taghavi Gilani, Alireza Bameshki, Majid Razavi, Ghorbanali Sadeghzadeh","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary compliance is an important lung factor and is affected by tidal volume. In this study, static and dynamic compliance with tidal volumes of 6 and 10 ml/kg have been evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients who were candidate for abdominal cancer surgery. This study was done in patients aged 20-65 years without chronic diseases. After induction of anesthesia, the first group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and 8 breaths/minute, and also the second group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 14 breaths/minute. From the beginning and every 15 minutes, expiratory tidal volume, peak and plateau airway pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured for two hours. The data was analyzed with SPSS v.20 and <i>P</i> < 0.05 was meaningful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups for demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the dynamic and static compliance of the patients during the study. However, the static compliance decreased in the 6 ml/kg group and increased in the 10 ml/kg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.32). The peak, plateau pressure and hemodynamic parameters were the same in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, the static and dynamic compliance was not significantly different in the two groups despite a slight decrease in the 6 ml/kg group and a slight increase in the 10 ml/kg group.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary compliance is an important lung factor and is affected by tidal volume. In this study, static and dynamic compliance with tidal volumes of 6 and 10 ml/kg have been evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients who were candidate for abdominal cancer surgery. This study was done in patients aged 20-65 years without chronic diseases. After induction of anesthesia, the first group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and 8 breaths/minute, and also the second group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 14 breaths/minute. From the beginning and every 15 minutes, expiratory tidal volume, peak and plateau airway pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured for two hours. The data was analyzed with SPSS v.20 and P < 0.05 was meaningful.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups for demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the dynamic and static compliance of the patients during the study. However, the static compliance decreased in the 6 ml/kg group and increased in the 10 ml/kg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). The peak, plateau pressure and hemodynamic parameters were the same in the two groups.

Conclusion: In general, the static and dynamic compliance was not significantly different in the two groups despite a slight decrease in the 6 ml/kg group and a slight increase in the 10 ml/kg group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潮气量为 6 毫升/千克和 10 毫升/千克时两种通气方法的动态和静态顺应性比较:随机临床试验。
背景:肺顺应性是一个重要的肺部因素,受到潮气量的影响。本研究评估了腹部癌症手术患者在潮气量为 6 毫升/千克和 10 毫升/千克时的静态和动态顺应性:这项随机临床试验针对 50 名腹部癌症手术候选患者。研究对象为 20-65 岁无慢性疾病的患者。麻醉诱导后,第一组采用潮气量为 10 毫升/千克、呼吸频率为 8 次/分钟的通气方式,第二组采用潮气量为 6 毫升/千克、呼吸频率为 14 次/分钟的通气方式。从开始到每隔 15 分钟测量一次呼气潮气量、气道压力峰值和平台值、心率和血压,持续两小时。数据用 SPSS v.20 进行分析,P < 0.05 为有意义:结果:两组患者的人口统计学特征无明显差异。研究期间,两组患者的动态和静态顺应性无明显差异。但 6 毫升/公斤组的静态顺应性下降,10 毫升/公斤组的静态顺应性上升,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.32)。两组的峰值、高原压和血液动力学参数相同:总的来说,尽管 6 毫升/千克组的静态和动态顺应性略有下降,10 毫升/千克组略有上升,但两组的静态和动态顺应性没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Narrative Intervention on Spoken Narrative and Reading Comprehension Abilities in Farsi-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Association between Major Dietary Patterns at Breakfast and Odds of Major Depressive Disorder: A Case-control Study. The Effect of Mixed Articulation Therapy on Perceptual and Acoustic Features of Compensatory Errors in Children with Cleft Palate. Aortic Calcification in Patients with Nephrolithiasis: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. Association of Obesity, Sarcopenia, and Functional Mobility with Risk of Fall: A Cross-Sectional Study from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1