Clinically-probed mechanisms of action in Fragile-X syndrome fail to normalize translational EEG phenotypes in Fmr1 knockout mice

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110182
Philipp Janz , Marie Bainier , Samuel Marashli, Simon Gross, Roger L. Redondo
{"title":"Clinically-probed mechanisms of action in Fragile-X syndrome fail to normalize translational EEG phenotypes in Fmr1 knockout mice","authors":"Philipp Janz ,&nbsp;Marie Bainier ,&nbsp;Samuel Marashli,&nbsp;Simon Gross,&nbsp;Roger L. Redondo","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP) deficiency. Electroencephalogram (EEG) changes in FXS include alterations of oscillatory activity and responses to sensory stimuli, some of which have been back-translated into rodent models by knocking-out the Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 gene (Fmr1-KO). However, the validity of these EEG phenotypes as objective biomarkers requires further investigation.</div><div>Potential pharmacotherapies such as mGluR5 inhibitors (e.g. CTEP; 2-chloro-4-((2,5-dimethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazole-4-yl)ethynyl)pyridine), GABA<sub>B</sub>R agonists (e.g. arbaclofen) and δ-containing GABA<sub>A</sub>R agonists (e.g. gaboxadol) have not translated into clinical success despite rescuing many phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Yet none of these treatments have been assessed on EEG phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Therefore, we set out to discover new EEG phenotypes in Fmr1-KO mice, using “task-free” and auditory-evoked (AEPs) and visually-evoked potential (VEP) paradigms, and probe their modulation by CTEP, arbaclofen and gaboxadol, using within-subjects designs.</div><div>First, we report Fmr1-KO-associated EEG abnormalities that closely resemble those observed in FXS, including elevated gamma-band power, reduced alpha/beta-band coherence, increased AEPs and delayed VEPs. Secondly, we found that pharmacological treatment, at best, only partially normalized EEG phenotypes. CTEP restored alpha/beta-band coherence and AEP amplitudes but failed to normalize gamma power and VEP latencies. Conversely, arbaclofen reduced gamma power but did not restore coherence or AEP amplitudes and further delayed VEPs. Gaboxadol did not normalize any EEG phenotypes.</div><div>We conclude that these compounds have limited ability to normalize these EEG phenotypes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19139,"journal":{"name":"Neuropharmacology","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 110182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028390824003514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein (FMRP) deficiency. Electroencephalogram (EEG) changes in FXS include alterations of oscillatory activity and responses to sensory stimuli, some of which have been back-translated into rodent models by knocking-out the Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 gene (Fmr1-KO). However, the validity of these EEG phenotypes as objective biomarkers requires further investigation.
Potential pharmacotherapies such as mGluR5 inhibitors (e.g. CTEP; 2-chloro-4-((2,5-dimethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazole-4-yl)ethynyl)pyridine), GABABR agonists (e.g. arbaclofen) and δ-containing GABAAR agonists (e.g. gaboxadol) have not translated into clinical success despite rescuing many phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Yet none of these treatments have been assessed on EEG phenotypes in the Fmr1-KO model. Therefore, we set out to discover new EEG phenotypes in Fmr1-KO mice, using “task-free” and auditory-evoked (AEPs) and visually-evoked potential (VEP) paradigms, and probe their modulation by CTEP, arbaclofen and gaboxadol, using within-subjects designs.
First, we report Fmr1-KO-associated EEG abnormalities that closely resemble those observed in FXS, including elevated gamma-band power, reduced alpha/beta-band coherence, increased AEPs and delayed VEPs. Secondly, we found that pharmacological treatment, at best, only partially normalized EEG phenotypes. CTEP restored alpha/beta-band coherence and AEP amplitudes but failed to normalize gamma power and VEP latencies. Conversely, arbaclofen reduced gamma power but did not restore coherence or AEP amplitudes and further delayed VEPs. Gaboxadol did not normalize any EEG phenotypes.
We conclude that these compounds have limited ability to normalize these EEG phenotypes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床探究的脆性 X 综合征作用机制未能使 Fmr1 基因敲除小鼠的翻译脑电图表型正常化。
脆性 X 综合征(FXS)是一种由脆性 X 信使核糖核蛋白(FMRP)缺乏引起的神经发育障碍。脆性 X 综合征的脑电图(EEG)变化包括振荡活动和对感觉刺激反应的改变,其中一些已通过敲除脆性 X 信使核糖核蛋白 1 基因(Fmr1-KO)反向转化为啮齿动物模型。然而,这些脑电图表型作为客观生物标志物的有效性还需要进一步研究。尽管在 Fmr1-KO 模型中挽救了许多表型,但这些治疗方法尚未转化为临床成功。然而,这些治疗方法都没有对 Fmr1-KO 模型的脑电图表型进行评估。因此,我们开始利用 "无任务"、听觉诱发电位(AEPs)和视觉诱发电位(VEP)范式发现 Fmr1-KO 小鼠的新脑电图表型,并利用受试者内设计探究 CTEP、阿巴洛芬和加博沙多对它们的调节作用。首先,我们报告了与 Fmr1-KO 相关的脑电图异常,这些异常与在 FXS 中观察到的异常非常相似,包括γ 波段功率升高、α/β 波段一致性降低、AEPs 增加和 VEPs 延迟。其次,我们发现药物治疗充其量只能使脑电图表型部分正常化。CTEP 恢复了阿尔法/贝塔波段相干性和 AEP 振幅,但未能使伽马功率和 VEP 延迟恢复正常。相反,阿巴洛芬降低了伽玛功率,但没有恢复一致性或 AEP 振幅,并进一步延迟了 VEP。加博沙多没有使任何脑电图表型恢复正常。我们的结论是,这些化合物使这些脑电图表型恢复正常的能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropharmacology
Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
288
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Neuropharmacology publishes high quality, original research and review articles within the discipline of neuroscience, especially articles with a neuropharmacological component. However, papers within any area of neuroscience will be considered. The journal does not usually accept clinical research, although preclinical neuropharmacological studies in humans may be considered. The journal only considers submissions in which the chemical structures and compositions of experimental agents are readily available in the literature or disclosed by the authors in the submitted manuscript. Only in exceptional circumstances will natural products be considered, and then only if the preparation is well defined by scientific means. Neuropharmacology publishes articles of any length (original research and reviews).
期刊最新文献
The role of the dopamine D1 receptor in anticipatory pleasure and social play. Effects of genetic knockdown of the serotonin transporter on established L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and gene expression in hemiparkinsonian rats. 20(R)-ginsenoside Rg3 protects against focal cerebral ischemia‒reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Mitochondrial DAMPs: Key Mediators in Neuroinflammation and Neurodegenerative Disease Pathogenesis. The synthetic cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 reduces experimental pruritus via CB2 receptor activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1